Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine?    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Gas Engines >> Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine?
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>  

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/5/2006 4:04 PM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
Hi.
I am planning on buying the 25% Greatplanes YAK ARF and installing a Fuji BT43EI.
Is this a good engine?
Can i see some pics of your installation?
Also,
when you mix gasoline with oil,
you just drop the oil in the can with the gasoline and then shake the can?


_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures
       Post #: 1

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/5/2006 6:38 PM   
Jake Ruddy



Posts: 4104
Score: 105
Joined: 5/22/2005
Last Login: 4/13/2013
From: Bear, DE, USA
Status: offline
Hi

Normally it's easiest to pour in the oil and just fill it up with gas. It's just like making the gas for a boat, lawn mower, or chainsaw.

As far as the engine choice.. well that directly relates to the type of flying you wish to do. Personally for similar money, lighter engine, and more power I would put a Brillelli 46 in it. http://brillelli.com/brillelli_engines_009.htm

I think will be happier as your flying develops and you need more power.

Just my 2 cents.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 2

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/5/2006 10:10 PM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
?

_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Antique)
       Post #: 3

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 6:40 AM   
hamman



Posts: 155
Score: 105
Joined: 8/28/2004
Last Login: 5/21/2013
From: Baltic, OH, USA
Status: offline
I purchased a Fuji 43 EI as a first gas engine and installed it on a G.P. Ultimate 1.60, I had lots of RFI issues but finally got it resolved by moving the ground wire direct to base of spark plug... I will add that others used this engine on the same plane without any problems... The engine is turning an MSC 20x8 prop at 6500 with about 1 gallon of gas run through it... The engine is very smooth running, it has no more vibration than my 1.50 and 1.80 Saito's... The engine starts very easy and has been reliable and idles very slow... I am happy with it but will add that I wish it had a little more power... Mine weighs 3.75 lbs with ignition... Just a comment from a newbie gas user, But I know one thing, I love gas!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 4

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 9:10 AM   
Dick T.


 

Posts: 1229
Score: 136
Joined: 2/13/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Visalia, CA, USA
Status: offline
The Fuji BT43EI will be fine, both as an engine alone and for your particular application. It is a reasonably priced, quality built engine.

Any time anyone asks about a particular engine, you will always get responses saying another brand is better or more powerful (all of which are generally more expensive, except for the Brillelli). It is a matter of individual preference so take it as that.

Gas engines need ample break in running to produce maximum power so none should be judged after the first gallon or two. I have Zenoah G-23 that I will absolutely not part with. It took three flying seasons to get eight gallons through it and it is now a snarling monster compared to the first season.

I have a Fuji BT43EI in the box waiting for project time plus a Fuji BT24 (new model) on back order. Specs say it weighs approximately two lbs including muffler so that one may start a new round of who has the lightest 23-26cc!


_____________________________

Dick Tristao
ModelGrafix

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 5

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 10:04 AM   
Antique



Posts: 9825
Score: 557
Joined: 7/14/2002
Last Login: 3/21/2012
From: Somewhere, DC, USA
Status: offline
UHHH...If you will look back a while you will see that there are no more posts from me about $440 or 190 mph...The two don't go together anyway...There is no company out there that threatens me, I can't keep up with what is in the shop now....I sometimes react to things and then have a change of heart...If the powers that be here would change the way posts are deleted so that EVERYTHING including the name is removed there would be no "." problem....
You're as bad with Brillelli as I am with Zenoah, maybe we should both back off a little..



< Message edited by RCIGN1 -- 11/6/2006 10:12 AM >


_____________________________

RC Ignition

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jake Ruddy)
       Post #: 6

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 10:52 AM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dick T.

The Fuji BT43EI will be fine, both as an engine alone and for your particular application. It is a reasonably priced, quality built engine.

Any time anyone asks about a particular engine, you will always get responses saying another brand is better or more powerful (all of which are generally more expensive, except for the Brillelli). It is a matter of individual preference so take it as that.

Gas engines need ample break in running to produce maximum power so none should be judged after the first gallon or two. I have Zenoah G-23 that I will absolutely not part with. It took three flying seasons to get eight gallons through it and it is now a snarling monster compared to the first season.

I have a Fuji BT43EI in the box waiting for project time plus a Fuji BT24 (new model) on back order. Specs say it weighs approximately two lbs including muffler so that one may start a new round of who has the lightest 23-26cc!




quote:

hamman Date 11/6/2006 12:40:52 PM
I purchased a Fuji 43 EI as a first gas engine and installed it on a G.P. Ultimate 1.60, I had lots of RFI issues but finally got it resolved by moving the ground wire direct to base of spark plug... I will add that others used this engine on the same plane without any problems... The engine is turning an MSC 20x8 prop at 6500 with about 1 gallon of gas run through it... The engine is very smooth running, it has no more vibration than my 1.50 and 1.80 Saito's... The engine starts very easy and has been reliable and idles very slow... I am happy with it but will add that I wish it had a little more power... Mine weighs 3.75 lbs with ignition... Just a comment from a newbie gas user, But I know one thing, I love gas!



Am,
can i see some pictures of your engine?
Also,
why did you installed the ground wire directly to the base of the spark plug?
Also,
i saw that Fuji(On Tower) has a 2stroke oil exactly for Fuji engines.
But the cost is really high,isn't it?
What other choices do i have considering the lubricant?
Thank you all guys who replied to my post.
You know,
buying an engine that's not a glow engine seems at first weird!!!!!!
Kostas

_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dick T.)
       Post #: 7

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 1:33 PM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 18600
Score: 662
Joined: 2/25/2002
Last Login: 1/16/2012
From: Valley Springs, CA, USA
Status: offline
Fuji is a line of engines best known for being cheap. With the exception of a certain B-25 that has a couple of cherry picked engines that's about their only claim to fame.

< Message edited by Silversurfer -- 11/6/2006 1:37 PM >


_____________________________

Never lie, and never minimize or gloss. Tell it like it is and let the pieces fall where they may. The truth always wins.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 8

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 5:56 PM   
Scott Ellingson



Posts: 1032
Score: 100
Joined: 8/10/2004
Last Login: 8/21/2008
From: Avon, MN, USA
Status: offline
Actually it is a 20x8 at 7000. Never tried a 22x8 on one

_____________________________

There is no replacement for displacement....you can allways throttle back!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jake Ruddy)
       Post #: 9

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 6:00 PM   
Jake Ruddy



Posts: 4104
Score: 105
Joined: 5/22/2005
Last Login: 4/13/2013
From: Bear, DE, USA
Status: offline
well I orig. suggested he 46.

I think a 40 is a bit small for that plane. I had a WH Yak with a strong 44 on it and it was great till you tried anything 3D and it wouldn't do much. I know that engine was stronger than a 40 and since the planes are similare weights I opt'd for the 46 choice right from the get go.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Scott Ellingson)
       Post #: 10

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 6:38 PM   
Scott Ellingson



Posts: 1032
Score: 100
Joined: 8/10/2004
Last Login: 8/21/2008
From: Avon, MN, USA
Status: offline
My Bad, I was thinking the 40. The 46 spins a Mejzlik 20x8 at over 7700. Oops

_____________________________

There is no replacement for displacement....you can allways throttle back!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jake Ruddy)
       Post #: 11

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 9:36 PM   
Dick T.


 

Posts: 1229
Score: 136
Joined: 2/13/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Visalia, CA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Silversurfer

Fuji is a line of engines best known for being cheap. With the exception of a certain B-25 that has a couple of cherry picked engines that's about their only claim to fame.


I agree the Brillelli is an awsome 46, own one myself.

Your statement "Fuji is a line of engines best known for being cheap" without facts is a pretty lame instead of saying it is your personal opinion. Sure some Fuji owners have had a bad apple but so has DA, 3W, ZDZ, and probably even Brillelli has had an occasional clunker.

If you don't own one then say it is your personal opinion or button up. Kostas1 question is about the Fuji43, not everyone's pet gas burner.

RCIGN1, your comments are always appreciated. You are one of the rare folks on RCU who know what he is talking about...walking the walk rather than talking the talk.


_____________________________

Dick Tristao
ModelGrafix

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 12

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 10:04 PM   
cu. in.


 

Posts: 289
Score: 100
Joined: 4/25/2002
Last Login: 1/27/2012
From: Birchwood, MN, USA
Status: offline
Kostas1,.

I tend to agree with Silversurfer, but why don't you do a search on the Fugi 43cc and read what other owners have said.

Bruce

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dick T.)
       Post #: 13

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 10:07 PM   
easton24


 

Posts: 370
Score: 100
Joined: 11/25/2004
Last Login: 3/2/2013
From: STEDMAN, NC, USA
Status: offline
I guess since I own a 43 fuji I can chime in without getting jumped on. I have one on a GP Ultimate. It flies the Ulti nice but that is for the type of flying I do. It is not a 3d machine with this engine. I have a 21x8 PT CF prop. I do like this engine it is very reliable engine and a excellent bargain when purchased from tower with the discount they give you. As a first gas engine I cant see why not. Check the Yak thread, I am sure someone used this combo and can comment on the performance.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dick T.)
       Post #: 14

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 10:54 PM   
Dick T.


 

Posts: 1229
Score: 136
Joined: 2/13/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Visalia, CA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cu. in.

Kostas1,.

I tend to agree with Silversurfer, but why don't you do a search on the Fugi 43cc and read what other owners have said.

Bruce


I have. Haven't found any negatives on the Fuji 43. A number of negatives on the Fuji 32BT, however locally several 32's perform right up there with any other in it's size.


_____________________________

Dick Tristao
ModelGrafix

Hide Signatures

(in reply to cu. in.)
       Post #: 15

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/6/2006 11:06 PM   
Dick T.


 

Posts: 1229
Score: 136
Joined: 2/13/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Visalia, CA, USA
Status: offline
Thank you for hands on comments.

The thing that some fellows miss when chiming in about their pet gasser is not everyone wants a 3D engine! That is not a benchmark for all engines.

Comparing a Brillelli 46 to a Fuji 43EI is fair based on real performance, weight, cost, etc., not "known for being cheap".




_____________________________

Dick Tristao
ModelGrafix

Hide Signatures

(in reply to easton24)
       Post #: 16

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/7/2006 12:47 AM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
Do you have some pics to post?

_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to easton24)
       Post #: 17

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/7/2006 5:35 AM   
hamman



Posts: 155
Score: 105
Joined: 8/28/2004
Last Login: 5/21/2013
From: Baltic, OH, USA
Status: offline
Kostas,
Here is Fuji mounted on a G.P. Ultimate. Flew 60 oz gas through it this afternoon, it runs nice and reliable as I previously posted... The plane weighs 15 lb, will hover but very slow pullout... Its not for hardcore 3D in this plane, but I really like the engine... Im not that interested in 3D anyway...Top veiw shows the mounting of ignition battery, exhaust side the E.I.M and SmartFly ignition cutoff under the EIM, and before everyone jumps on me the screws that hold the EIM in place are run through fuel line for isolation... carb side shows nyrod throttle linkage and choke rod runs out front of cowl... The fuel tank mounted on CG... Receiver and its battery are mounted under front edge of canopy, with servo for throttle to right of receiver... Hope this helps....Larry

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by hamman -- 11/7/2006 5:47 AM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 18

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/7/2006 10:00 AM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
Thank you for your pics.
Ah,
i have some questions though!
What type ( diameter ) fuel line did you use and also did you use the same fuel line for the installation of the inside of the tank?
Also,
what prop do you use?

_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to hamman)
       Post #: 19

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/7/2006 10:17 AM   
anthonymio


 

Posts: 124
Score: 100
Joined: 6/25/2002
Last Login: 5/21/2013
From: No City, USA
Status: offline
Kosta,

Kalispera! I too have a Fuji 43EI mounted on a GP Ultimate and find that this engine is as user friendly as my DA50 and DA100. Not as powerful as perhaps a ZDZ40, but at least you can rely that it will start without throwing out your arm. My engine has provided excellent service in the last year. I have had no sudden dead sticks, no interference problems and I can fly the Ultimate 12 -14 minutes safely on a 16 oz. tank (with a few oz. to spare). It was broken in on Lawnboy ashless oil (petroleum based oil) at a 32:1 mix for a gallon. I am now using AMSOIL synthetic at an 80:1 mix. I ran this mix all summer in the Arizona heat without a problem. Currently, it sports a XOAR 20X8 prop and it consistently does 6600 RPM. I am thinking of swapping it out for a Mezjlik CF prop to squeeze a few more RPM out of her. I would say that the Fuji 43 is a good value and will provide good reliable service. It will perform well in aerobatic airframes at 14lbs or less (12 to 13lbs if you want stellar 3D performance). If you desire power, get the ZDZ40, however, prepare yourself for many frustrating days of attempting to start the beast. I have read much positive hype on the Brellilli, however, I do not know anyone in my club who currently is using one, so, I can't comment on it's performance. I think for a first gasser the Fuji is an excellent engine. Feel free to contact me if you need any more information on this engine (from one fellow Greek to another).

Yea sou!
Antones Meologos

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 20

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/7/2006 11:50 AM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
Hey thank's for your advice/information.
How do you know that kalispera=good afternoon?

Are you from Greece and you live in USA?
Also,
i know it's a bit difficult for you,but do you have a video of the BT43EI running?


_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to anthonymio)
       Post #: 21

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/8/2006 10:15 AM   
anthonymio


 

Posts: 124
Score: 100
Joined: 6/25/2002
Last Login: 5/21/2013
From: No City, USA
Status: offline
Kosta,

I am an American of Greek decent. Born in the U.S.A. of Greek immigrant parents. I speak and read the language and visit Greece to see my relatives every couple of years. I am very surprised by the number of Hellenes that aeromodel in Greece. I imagine it is not an inexpensive hobby for you.

I don't have a movie of the Fuji, however, I have attached a link to a review of the GP Aeromaster bipe that uses the Fuji 43. It's a good review of both airplane and the Fuji and includes installation photos and a video of the Fuji powering the Aeromaster.

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=566313

Andio,
Antonis

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Kostas1)
       Post #: 22

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/8/2006 3:59 PM   
Kostas1



Posts: 3426
Score: 330
Joined: 12/19/2005
Last Login: 5/14/2013
From: AthensAthens, GREECE
Status: offline
Boy,
thank you.
Aeromodelling in Greece is expensive.
That's why many Greek friends-aeromodellers buy from USA etc etc.
How do you mix the gasoline with the oil?
Ante kalo apogevma file.
Kostas
Athens/Greece

_____________________________

<==**Check my gallery for more pictures**
Club Saito member #706

Hide Signatures

(in reply to anthonymio)
       Post #: 23

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/9/2006 8:43 PM   
Dick T.


 

Posts: 1229
Score: 136
Joined: 2/13/2002
Last Login: 5/22/2013
From: Visalia, CA, USA
Status: offline
Poco242,

I'm not sure Brian meant his comments to belittle your engines but, perhaps, more tired of people taking a thread immediately off topic.

My annoyance with this thread, and many others, is where a person is asking for feedback about a specific product but immediately gets someone's pet product shoved in their face, and in many cases deride the original person's choice.

There is nothing wrong with being an enthusiastic and satisfied customer but replyers should give it a rest when someone asks about a specific product.

Most modelers spending time on the web are pretty knowledgable about what is available so their questions usually surround a product. And once he obtains the specific info he may change his mind or firm his decision.

Kostas1 wanted information about the Fuji43EI on this specific ARF. If one reads back through this thread there are a number of appropriate replys to his question. Sinergy's attempt to be "helpful" is honorable but off topic just like most of the posts, including this one.

The rest of the Brillelli, Zenoah, DA posters need to shut up and let the Fuji owners get this thread back on topic.


_____________________________

Dick Tristao
ModelGrafix

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Scott Ellingson)
       Post #: 24

RE: Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine? - 11/9/2006 8:57 PM   
Scott Ellingson



Posts: 1032
Score: 100
Joined: 8/10/2004
Last Login: 8/21/2008
From: Avon, MN, USA
Status: offline
Dick,

You are 100% correct. I just felt I was being blamed for others posts on our product. If it wasn't for that I would have said nothing.

Enough is enough, back to the question at hand. The Fuji BT43EI

_____________________________

There is no replacement for displacement....you can allways throttle back!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dick T.)
       Post #: 25

Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>  
All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel &amp; Mfg Support Forums >> Gas Engines >> Fuji BT43EI good as a first gas engine?
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.297RCU1