RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 2:58:34 AM   
reincarnate



Posts: 805
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline
You gotta love a story where the pilot actually thinks things through before putting her in. Usually my crashes are more sudden and violent! Good luck on the fix. My 60 is still sitting in the corner while I ponder my repair. Going with a different color scheme since I've got some balsa to rebuild.

Can't seem to get the wind to stop blowing here. Temps finally in the 50's during the day, but it seems the wind speed matches the thermometer most days. Going to take the 1.5 out tomorrow and run a couple of more tanks of fuel through it and if the wind isn't blowing too much, going to shoot some taxi runs on the short strip at my house.

Went to a local hobby show this weekend, and some guy had a NIB old style 1.50 Mustang (previous edition) for 275.00. My boy saw it, and by the time I got there it was gone. Someone got the deal of the year. Did walk away with a train wreck of a TF giant Corsair for 45.00 though. Might have hope for it next winter.

Haven't heard many of you guys talking about your maidens! Who's putting them up and how are they flying? Make sure you include your power plant and mods.

(in reply to Rip n Bank)
       Post #: 326

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 3:41:53 AM   
tailskid



Posts: 5509
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Tolleson, AZ, USA
Status: offline
Saw one of the 'old' versions fly Sunday with a Saito 180 - nice!!!! But I think I will go with a Evol 26GT after I take it out of the P-47-150.

_____________________________

# 93 in Club Saito

(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 327

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 4:20:28 AM   
Flyjets



Posts: 1222
Joined: 8/19/2002
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Status: offline

Tom

While I no Longer own a 180 I work on them still. I find here in Florida that never ever is the low end screw flush with the Throttle arm. Typically it indented a few mm.

The best and really only way to Tune this Engine is to run her up with the proper Prop usually around 9000 rpm and lean the motor out till she peaks. Next richin her back up by 200 to 300 RPMs.

Now adjust the low end for a smooth Idle and transition to full power. Once you have done this I repeat it one more time and usually that's all u need to do with the Low end. I do retune my High end needle every day.

Hope that gets u going with her.

Ian

_____________________________

RCU Moderator
Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things

(in reply to 1080tommy)
       Post #: 328

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 2:10:55 PM   
solarmusic-RCU


 

Posts: 95
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: St Petersburg, FL, USA
Status: offline
OK, so here's a maiden for you. I'm running a new Supertiger 2300. The plane came out about a pound light since I didn't add the bombs, left out one servo and mounted the engine way forward. So the take off...I was a little concerned about a nose over so I held a little too much back pressure on the elevator and after a nice straight take off run of about 75 feet, I was airborne, and porpoiseing a little, not having quite enough airspeed. Needed about 6 clicks of down and got things squared away, gear still down. I was a little worried about the new engine , perhaps unnecessarily so, but I sensed that it had sagged. There were other p[lanes in the air and I couldn't hear it. Brought her around for a long approach and felt really good about my position. This plane really can slow down. Did not employ flaps. She just wouldn't settle, and I was afraid to punch the throttle, so I took what I had. I caught a weel on the edge of the runway and that was enough to rip the gear out. The rear rail held. I had added a good big piece of 1/4 stock under it, but the front rail broke out and the gear flanges bent really badly like soft aluminum would. Diagnosis: make sure you are a degree or two nose heavy for maiden. Then just fly the darn thing. I was too tennative. Land very softly or go around. The gear mounts are a nice interlocking assembly of light ply, not all that well fitted and the some hot glue here and there. Not very many of the surfaces were really alligned and there was very little real glue in there. Once I rebuild the mount and leading edge I am installing Robart 660 struts (Tower $80 the pair ) I'll have to straighten the flanges and re install. Next time I'll fly with a lot more authority and make sure that I land like a butterfly with sore feet. The gear rails need as much help as you can give them even between the actual mount and the wheel well. There is a continuation of the forward rail that runs out toward the wheel that could use some 1/4 stock for support. Next time I'll fly it like a P51.

(in reply to Flyjets)
       Post #: 329

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 9:26:39 PM   
Rip n Bank


 

Posts: 502
Joined: 3/12/2005
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: solarmusic-RCU

OK, so here's a maiden for you. I'm running a new Supertiger 2300. The plane came out about a pound light since I didn't add the bombs, left out one servo and mounted the engine way forward. So the take off...I was a little concerned about a nose over so I held a little too much back pressure on the elevator and after a nice straight take off run of about 75 feet, I was airborne, and porpoiseing a little, not having quite enough airspeed. Needed about 6 clicks of down and got things squared away, gear still down. I was a little worried about the new engine , perhaps unnecessarily so, but I sensed that it had sagged. There were other p[lanes in the air and I couldn't hear it. Brought her around for a long approach and felt really good about my position. This plane really can slow down. Did not employ flaps. She just wouldn't settle, and I was afraid to punch the throttle, so I took what I had. I caught a weel on the edge of the runway and that was enough to rip the gear out. The rear rail held. I had added a good big piece of 1/4 stock under it, but the front rail broke out and the gear flanges bent really badly like soft aluminum would. Diagnosis: make sure you are a degree or two nose heavy for maiden. Then just fly the darn thing. I was too tennative. Land very softly or go around. The gear mounts are a nice interlocking assembly of light ply, not all that well fitted and the some hot glue here and there. Not very many of the surfaces were really alligned and there was very little real glue in there. Once I rebuild the mount and leading edge I am installing Robart 660 struts (Tower $80 the pair ) I'll have to straighten the flanges and re install. Next time I'll fly with a lot more authority and make sure that I land like a butterfly with sore feet. The gear rails need as much help as you can give them even between the actual mount and the wheel well. There is a continuation of the forward rail that runs out toward the wheel that could use some 1/4 stock for support. Next time I'll fly it like a P51.


Solar,

Sorry to hear about your experience on your P-51's maiden! I did have a few questions and thoughts:

1. The SuperTiger should have enough power to fly the plane, especially if she's a "pound light." Was it at WOT for take-off? Did the engine perform nominally (and reliably) on an engine stand, at WOT with the prop used on the maiden, before mounting on the 'Stang for the maiden?
2. Porpoising could be from excessive elevator input (pilot), using high-rate instead of low-rate or expo, and/or using the full factory recommended 1/2" throws (elevator) which are believed by many in this group to be too much.
3. As for making it a "degree or two nose-heavy for maiden", you shouldn't have to. If you nailed the factory CG location when the tank is dry, then when you fill the tank, you are already significantly nose-heavy for any take-off, including the maiden.
4. I NEVER maiden in a crowded sky! Like you said, you just can't hear the engine. This is really important with a new engine! Nor do I want the distraction! I prefer "pre-existing silence," and empty skies, for my maidens, and I'm willing to wait for it!
5. I heavily fiberglass reinforced both the front and rear gear rails in the wing. If I hit something, at speed, off the runway, that takes off the gear, an appreciable portion of the wing is coming coming with it!
6. My 60-size H9 P-51 wants to go "tail-high" on my take-off rolls, and I suspect my giant-scale version will want to do the same. I've held slight up elevator in the smaller 'Stang during take-offs, just enough to keep the fuselage level when the tail wheel comes up. An alternative, AFTER maiden (RE: neutral trim is, as yet, unknown), is to bump in a number of up-trims on the elevator so you don't have to worry about managing the tail lift while you're fighting engine torque on throttle-up with right-rudder, and then trimming it down the same number of beeps/clicks to neutral when the gear is up and she's climbing out.

However, as we all know, this scenario is easy to analyze in the hangar, and hard to manage real-time on the actual maiden. I'll be doing my maiden by month's end, and will post my "results" here.

As my previous signature used to say, "Never precede any maiden flight with a statement more predictive than 'Watch this!' "

Good luck with the repairs!

Bo

_____________________________

The more planes you have in your "hangar," the less likely your wife will notice a new one!

(in reply to solarmusic-RCU)
       Post #: 330

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/13/2007 10:07:31 PM   
solarmusic-RCU


 

Posts: 95
Joined: 8/8/2003
From: St Petersburg, FL, USA
Status: offline
It hauled butt with a 16 x 8 3 blade. Tons of power. I flew a couple of circuits at 1/3 throttle to sort out elevator and get used to a touch more aileron than was needed. I never fly dual rates. Porpoise was me taking off without full TO speed and a sensitive elevator. Sorted it out after 1 1/2 circuts. Trust me, it could have used another 3 - 4 oz up front. That would have put me just ahead of the book, maybe 3/16" or so. I know P51's. They like to slice the air, slightly nose down, ( just a hair ) not lift into it without a lot of speed. Its the downthrust thing that helps most planes. My experience is exactly the same as yours on the h9 60 except that I don't add up enevator with trim for TO. I do it with the stick. I can hold it level and, I like long "show of"f TO's, like the real deal. My old flight instructor told me you're flying the minute you start your roll. so just fly it level, son. I just nicely got airborne and a couple of boneheads simply took off as if it was an old plane. Just bad manners. I should have eased the throttle forward and trusted the engine woud take it. I was just too careful and was freaked out when the darn thing wouldn't sink when it was supposed to. I have never had a retract fail at the rails before in 10 years. And I did beef them up as usual. Its just I couldn't see the bad joints way under there. That won't happen again. I'll pull the good one and soak it too. Next, the aluminum flanges are very soft. Not at all like Robart which are very hard. Try to remember this...this plane will really slow down on its own and will float. You may not need flaps on first flights. It will land like a trainer if you don't over concern yourself. Next time I will fly it the way I fly all the others. I just got wussy.

(in reply to Rip n Bank)
       Post #: 331

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 1:43:33 AM   
reincarnate



Posts: 805
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline
Ran the 26 GT tonight. Showing 8100 RPM with a Xoar 18x8. Swapped out for a Zinger Pro 16x10 and read...8000. Hmmm. Figured I'd gain at least 200-250 RPM not loose 100. Granted I'm still running 30:1 for break in and haven't dialed the carb all the way in yet, but still...

Anyway, the wind was blowing hard enough to darn near unload the prop on the ground, so no taxi tonight.

Tailskid, I shot a video of the 26 GT for sound of the engine, but can't figure out how to download to post. Does sound nice though!

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by reincarnate -- 3/20/2007 2:01:40 AM >

(in reply to tailskid)
       Post #: 332

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 1:50:49 AM   
Spitpilot


 

Posts: 70
Joined: 11/12/2002
From: Newcastle, WA, USA
Status: offline
Bo, I think you should be absolutely sure that it was a leaky fuel tank plug that caused the engine failure - in my experience these plugs can relax after time and should be checked for tightness. However, the two cases where I experienced a leaky fuel tank plug, fuel leakage was apparent during the engine run up before flight so I never actually took off with a leaky fuel tank plug - just a thought so it might be worth a few extra minutes to make sure it was not something else.

John.

(in reply to Rip n Bank)
       Post #: 333

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 3:22:57 AM   
tailskid



Posts: 5509
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Tolleson, AZ, USA
Status: offline
Ordered me another 26GT today...and 10 servos........hope the wife doesn't look too hard at our VISA bill!!! Guess that means I have to start working on the Mustang....darn, but someone has to

_____________________________

# 93 in Club Saito

(in reply to Spitpilot)
       Post #: 334

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 9:47:19 AM   
BankYank



Posts: 935
Joined: 11/1/2003
From: Kootenai, ID, USA
Status: offline
My 26Gt is back at Horizon. Was only tacking 7250rpm with a APC 17X10
PAT

_____________________________

I tell ya she turned me into a newt she did

(in reply to tailskid)
       Post #: 335

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 4:50:13 PM   
Rip n Bank


 

Posts: 502
Joined: 3/12/2005
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Spitpilot

Bo, I think you should be absolutely sure that it was a leaky fuel tank plug that caused the engine failure - in my experience these plugs can relax after time and should be checked for tightness. However, the two cases where I experienced a leaky fuel tank plug, fuel leakage was apparent during the engine run up before flight so I never actually took off with a leaky fuel tank plug - just a thought so it might be worth a few extra minutes to make sure it was not something else.

John.


John,

Good advice, thanks!

I didn't get into it in my previous post, but at the time, another experienced flyer and I talked about the possibility that the mixture was set too lean. This was before I tore the plane down at home and found the loose fuel tank cap. Neither he, nor I, remembered seeing the slight, but obligatory, "smoke trail" you want to see from a Saito in flight. However, we also don't remember NOT seeing it!

In the past, I've had a Saito 91 set too lean by a "club expert", and experienced a "soft seize" while airborne, which required the bearings to be replaced. In this case, I turned the engine over when I picked up the 'Stang from her belly landing, and there was no tell-tale internal resistance to rotation other than the usual compression.

It's a distinct possibility that this (mixture) is the actual culprit, so I intend to strap her down and do some careful checking of the mixture and do multiple run-ups, before she takes to the skies again.

Bo


_____________________________

The more planes you have in your "hangar," the less likely your wife will notice a new one!

(in reply to Spitpilot)
       Post #: 336

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/14/2007 10:07:18 PM   
reincarnate



Posts: 805
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tailskid

Ordered me another 26GT today...and 10 servos........hope the wife doesn't look too hard at our VISA bill!!! Guess that means I have to start working on the Mustang....darn, but someone has to

Tailskid, what kind of RPM (and prop) were you getting with your other 26 GT? After reading BankYank's post, I'm kind of wondering if I will get that extra 6-700 RPM after break in. Just curious to see your numbers.

(in reply to tailskid)
       Post #: 337

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 3/15/2007 1:08:06 AM   
tailskid