RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: targa457
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build
Page: <<   < prev  64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/8/2008 8:18:57 PM   
kahloq



Posts: 1797
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline
Captainron, here's Rips P-51 flying. I think I posted these on page 58 or something

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by kahloq -- 7/8/2008 8:19:17 PM >

(in reply to kahloq)
       Post #: 1626

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/8/2008 10:48:33 PM   
Rip n Bank


 

Posts: 503
Joined: 3/12/2005
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: reincarnate


quote:

ORIGINAL: kiosk

hey guys, putting together Frankie (second one) dont recall where this part belongs, dont seem to find in manual...what is it?


It's the "scale" radio antennae. Leave it off, or break it off the first time you load it in the trailer!


LOL!

Yeah, when I was building Frankie, I picked up that "antenna" out of the box, flexed it, and said "Oh, yeah, right." and tossed it in the trash bin!

Ironically, I eventually resolved my range test issues with Frankie by incorporating a functional Dean's mast antenna in the same place as the scale antenna location.

Rip

_____________________________

The more planes you have in your "hangar," the less likely your wife will notice a new one!

(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 1627

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/8/2008 10:52:28 PM   
Tisoy909



Posts: 164
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Redlands, CA, USA
Status: offline
kahloq, so do you normally do landings with half flaps then, i noticed on your set of pics, which was on landing i believe. If it gives me better performance and stability on landing i will try to make this a habit, had one tip stall on landing and dont need it to happen again heh.
Thanks.
Loiue

_____________________________

" To thine own self be true "

(in reply to Rip n Bank)
       Post #: 1628

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/8/2008 10:52:38 PM   
Rip n Bank


 

Posts: 503
Joined: 3/12/2005
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kahloq

Captainron, here's Rips P-51 flying. I think I posted these on page 58 or something


Capt. Ron,

See there!

Neener, neener...

Rip

_____________________________

The more planes you have in your "hangar," the less likely your wife will notice a new one!

(in reply to kahloq)
       Post #: 1629

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/9/2008 12:01:54 AM   
kahloq



Posts: 1797
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tisoy909

kahloq, so do you normally do landings with half flaps then, i noticed on your set of pics, which was on landing i believe. If it gives me better performance and stability on landing i will try to make this a habit, had one tip stall on landing and dont need it to happen again heh.
Thanks.
Loiue


Hi,
Yes I always land with at least 1/2 flaps unless there's like a 15-20MPH head wind. I have never tried to land without flaps on this plane. If there's very little wind, I'll use full flaps and she can slow down a lot without tip stalling even on a shallow glide path. If the head wind is average...say 7-12mph, I'll use 1/2 flaps. The only time(so far), Ive stalled a wing on landing was intentional when my gear wouldnt deploy and I had to belly land in some tall wheat grass. In that case, once I was a little over 2 feet above the grass, I pulled on the elevator to stall the plane(with the result of the stall having the nose up) so it would basically drop on the grass belly first instead of digging in with the prop. Those watching the belly land attempt thought I inputted the elevator at that point cuz I got nervous or something....but it was on purpose. As a result of the maneuver, I suffered zero damage to the plane, not even the prop was scuffed or broken.

i should also note though that I have had to abort some landing attempts and go around(by quickly throttling back up). I dont want to sound like Im some guru of landings. Rip uses full flaps almost all the time, but he comes in at a MUCH steeper angle and then flairs. I dont....I come in like a full size plane and bleed off speed and once over the threshold throttle back more gradually to try and maintain a relatively gentle glide slope...Im not bringing it on the prop per say as the wings are still flying, but some ppl arent comfortable landing this way. Just like im not comfortable landing with a steep approach and then do a sudden flair. In either case, use your flaps. Full flaps are nice for a lot of lift but too much wind can cause a ballooning effect.

(in reply to Tisoy909)
       Post #: 1630

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/9/2008 4:20:21 PM   
captainron


 

Posts: 183
Joined: 6/19/2006
From: PUEBLO WEST, CO, USA
Status: offline
OMG!!!!!!
LIKE THEY SAY, THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING!!!

kahloq,
I can see you've got your buddy's back covered!

RIP N BANK,
SWEEEEEEEET! SHE LOOKS JUST LIKE MINE! GO FIGURE

DANG! I LOVE THIS HOBBY...............................................CAPTAIN RON.

(in reply to kahloq)
       Post #: 1631

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 1:16:09 AM   
kiosk



Posts: 192
Joined: 2/12/2008
From: , FL, USA
Status: offline
anyone try the bolly 4-blade prop? I think was on few pages back someone was going to try it....??

also....even thou this is my second Frankie build, any tips on how to install the FG36 motor and proper alignment with cowl? I put on yesterday with the required firewall mod but is too low and off center with cowl!!! yuk!!

< Message edited by kiosk -- 7/10/2008 12:56:06 PM >

(in reply to captainron)
       Post #: 1632

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 4:23:20 PM   
borabora22


 

Posts: 93
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: chanhassen, MN, USA
Status: online
With regard to the (new version P-51). After using the retracts included with the kit are you satisfied with their performance?

If you had it to do over again would you choose an aftermarket gear? I would appreciate hearing your comments. Thanks!

(in reply to kahloq)
       Post #: 1633

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 7:56:03 PM   
reincarnate



Posts: 805
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: borabora22

With regard to the (new version P-51). After using the retracts included with the kit are you satisfied with their performance?

If you had it to do over again would you choose an aftermarket gear? I would appreciate hearing your comments. Thanks!


Nope to the first question and yep to the second. There's my comment. I wouldn't recommend then to anyone unless you're fortunate enough to land on asphalt. The welds on the scissors are substandard, and the oleos are soft, bending easily.

Of course I land perfect about 50% of the time, too. Maybe my gear should cast iron.

(in reply to borabora22)
       Post #: 1634

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 8:03:56 PM   
GSK


 

Posts: 86
Joined: 4/4/2007
From: Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: borabora22

With regard to the (new version P-51). After using the retracts included with the kit are you satisfied with their performance?

If you had it to do over again would you choose an aftermarket gear? I would appreciate hearing your comments. Thanks!


Read back through previous post a little . From an engineering point of view
They are absolute rubbish and are Misrepresented by the description on the box the kit comes with
Regards G

(in reply to borabora22)
       Post #: 1635

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 10:26:48 PM   
borabora22


 

Posts: 93
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: chanhassen, MN, USA
Status: online
I have installed the ones that came with the kit but am having second thoughts now. They looked sturdy but after reading the posts about the welds I am not to sure. .Looks like their is extra sanding, cutting, drilling and filling to get the Robarts in. This is my first large aircraft and I had troubles getting the stock ones to operate correctly. No matter what I do one gear door hangs down a littlle. If I get rid of the hang then the servos buzz. The other one works fine. Its driving me nuts.

(in reply to GSK)
       Post #: 1636

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 10:30:24 PM   
Rip n Bank


 

Posts: 503
Joined: 3/12/2005
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GSK


quote:

ORIGINAL: borabora22

With regard to the (new version P-51). After using the retracts included with the kit are you satisfied with their performance?

If you had it to do over again would you choose an aftermarket gear? I would appreciate hearing your comments. Thanks!


Read back through previous post a little . From an engineering point of view
They are absolute rubbish and are Misrepresented by the description on the box the kit comes with
Regards G


Hey GSK,

I'm just a bit unclear as to what you think about the stock gear. Could you please elaborate???

OK, joking aside, I'm going to try to make mine last as long as possible (Read: smooth asphalt runway landings) until Robart releases their drop-in set...

Rip

_____________________________

The more planes you have in your "hangar," the less likely your wife will notice a new one!

(in reply to GSK)
       Post #: 1637

RE: New Hangar 9 1.50 P-51 Build - 7/10/2008 11:13:44 PM   
borabora22


 

Posts: 93
Joined: 11/6/2007
From: chanhassen, MN, USA
Status: online
Is Robart making a direct fit repacement? That would be great. I spoke with them this morning and they did not mention it.

(in reply to Rip n Bank)