JettPilot
Posts: 1149
Joined: 4/18/2005 From: Paradise, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Flyboy Dave An APC prop cannot even approach the performance of a Zinger prop in the sport line. You are trying to fool the people that don't know you are using specialty APC pattern props, and specialty pylon props on your small engines. In general use use the APC's are junk compared to the Zingers. FBD. You are very wrong about this Flyboy Dave, but I would be willing to do a test. The static thrust measurements done at the beginning of this thread dont mean much, because no plane flys at zero airspeed. The only good way to measure the performance of the prop is to check how the plane performs with each prop in the air. I have sevaral UAV's that sends live video with speed, and altitude back to the ground with the following engines - Evolution .46 Saito .82 and Zenoah G-26 and Zenoah G-45. I am not going to spend a bunch of money to test Zingers larger props, but I will buy one Zinger of the smaller ones ( Evo .46 and Saito .82) and do a test of speed, and rate of climb and compare it on those airplanes to the same size APC's that I always use. I will post the videos and results so that everyone can see the numbers for themselves. I bet you a case of beer that APC wins hands down, but I need all the performance I can get on my UAV's, and if Zinger does perform better, I will have all my props switched over before you can drink those beers If anyone wants me to test any other prop, they can send it to me and I will test and post a video and results... If it is an expensive prop, I will be happy to send it back after testing is done. JettPilot To see one of the videos with data feedback, click on this link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F42iBPOPCr0
< Message edited by JettPilot -- 12/22/2006 5:33:28 PM >
_____________________________
THE TRUTH ABOVE ALL ELSE...
|