RVM
Posts: 1975
Joined: 3/12/2006 From: Sacramento,
CA, USA Status: offline
|
So why doesn't someone analyze the effect different props have in the air? You would think, with all the research that has been done over the past 100 years, that this debate would be moot. Is there an aeronautical engineer anywhere around? I fly with a bunch of aerospace engineers, and quite a few use low-pitch props on their Saitos and have no problems. Mathematically, they can show you why the props they choose are better for 3d type flying. In fact, a few plan every component of their aircraft out using nothing but numbers to determine which servo, how long the arms have to be to apply a certain amount of torque, the strength of various parts used in the construction, which engine, with what amount of nitro (based on our elevation), oil and methanol, and which prop etc. etc. The planes are usually near perfect the first day at the field. I've never, nor have I ever seen anyone overheat an engine in 5-10 seconds of hovering, cowl or no cowl. If the cowl is that tight around the engine (or even if there isn't a cowl), and the engine temperature is so close to overheating that hovering for 10 seconds will overheat it, then I believe it would overheat in the same amount of time on the ground.
_____________________________
There is no substitution for human competition.
|