wojtek
Posts: 3895
Score: 115 Joined: 12/26/2001 Last Login: 6/18/2013 From: nj,
NJ, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ColinSt Hi, I am the builder of the MB339 that is currently being reviewed in RCJI, and I am surprised to read the comments about the wing structure, as the model I built does not seem to suffer from any of these issues. The ribs that can be seen through the servo bays and the undercarriage openings are extremely well bonded into place, with a solid glue fillet, and the leading edge of the wing seems equally solid. Going by the weight of the wings, PLENTY of glue has been used in the structure, and they seem extremely stiff and strong. Rest assured, if I felt there were any weaknesses in the model I would have mentioned them in the review, but I have not come across even one poor joint in this model. As an aside, this model was bought from the stock of the UK distributor for Skymaster at the time, Als Hobbies, and had not been selected by the factory. Now this does not mean that all the MB339 kits produced are of the same quality, I can only go on my experience with the review model, but I was very impressed by the quality of this model. As an aside, I have built my own tip tanks for the model, as the tanks used by the New Zealand Air Force are different to the tanks currently available for the model MB339. These tanks were built up from balsa and ply, and details will be in the next and final article on the model, due to be in the next RCJI issue, which should be available at the end of January. Colin on both the SM and FB versions of the plane the leading edges were coming open. The ribs in both had already been cracked. The SM version ribs were VERY weak. Even lightly squeezing the wing cracks these ( which were not already cracked) .. the balsa is of the worse quality i have ever seen on a jet arf or kit... i don't understand why these cold just not have been made of liteply .. the wing is already heavy as it is anyway .... On both airplanes, there was also not enough glue around where the wing tubes attach to the wing structure. The SM version of the main gear doors did not shut all the way either, and woud need to have been cut up to close over the gear. The FB one came with all the gear doors affixed, and made to match up to the fuse properly, and close over the landing gear ... lastly, on the fuselage of the SM version, each bulkhead former ws prominently visible through the skin. The FB one is 100% smooth ... both versions have imperfections out of the mold, which requires redoing a lot of the intricate detail, such as rivets and panel lines. Skymaster informed me that their version I had never passed QC and AirPack should not have sold it to me, so maybe other production models were better .. After some modifications and A LOT of reinforcing, i think all in all this is a very impressive airplane. I am putting a at450 in mine ( yea, i don't need that much power, but its what i have around ) ..... the plane is HUGE !! and even with the problems, its worth the $ .. ( just don't buy one from AirPack ... , as i think they might be looking for someone to stuff with the one i had returned ) Voy
_____________________________
www.facebook.com/allscale http://www.all-scale.com -working model MFD & HUD, 3D print, Metal-Morph Plating, Custom-Build
Hide Signatures
|