mfuess
Posts: 402
Joined: 9/5/2002 From: Bedford,
TX, USA Status: offline
|
Greetings Gentleman! I am the engineer and host of the GSW Tech Site. I'm glad you found the information regarding the Venom 45 useful. Yes, the thrust numbers were calculated to set a benchmark for "live" testing. I've flown on a large number of props to determine where the powerband really is, and see which props take advantage of this massive stroker (for its size). The Pro Zinger 22x8 is (by far) the best prop to get maximum torque from the Venom 45. While the "suggested" props work OK, they tend to rev beyond the engines torque curve. I did a side by side comparison to my BME 50 and the V 45 can, and will out pull the BME under controlled conditions. However, nothing replaces displacement when it comes down to brutal flying power. The Venom 45 is a supereme engine, especially for the price! Will it replace a BME 50, DA 50, G62, etc.? In a word no. the 50cc+ engines are in a class by themselves. BUT the V45 will certainly replace virtually all 45cc engines and a few 50cc engines with power to spare. Regarding the ignition. Yes I had some issues with the OEM module but Tim (at Copperhead) has sent a replacement. Meanwhile, I am using a CH module with Syncro-spark and it works excellent. My understanding from Tim is, they are in the process of upgrading their ignition. I am very familiar with the ignition he is considering and it's fantastic! It's very reliable, low current draw, and has a full scale spark advance. Bookmark my Tech Site as I will be updating the Venom 45 Review as the engine gets lots of air-miles on it. I don't mind telling you, that you get maximum bang for the engine buck with these engines.
|