RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> WildHare R/C Support >> RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed
Page: <<   < prev  14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 12:09:34 AM   
Barry Cazier


 

Posts: 3341
Joined: 10/2/2003
From: Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Status: offline
My Edge had zero offset in the firewall. I ended up pulling the old firewall out and moved the new one to the end of the motor box to help shorten the standoffs. I put 1/4" RH thrust in it. Looking at the prop...the side of the box on the right is 1/4" longer than the one on the left. After that I ended up shimming 1 washer for more RH thrust. When I accelerate full throttle on the uplines it still pulls slightly to the left. (still could use a bit more RH at full throttle) But, I like the way it flys where it's at now. In hover it's almost perfect until you go to full throttle. Also, if you change the firewall, like I did, I recommend going with "aircraft quality" plywood, 1/4" thick. The supplied firewall is very soft. Also, be sure and use fender washers on the standoffs and bolts. This pushes the weight over a greater area which helps with the soft firewall.

Good luck with your build. I think you'll really like this plane. Also, consider the carbon fiber landing gear and wing tube to help reduce weight. I have those pieces and a CF tailwheel and stab tube. I'm at 16lbs 10ozs. No lightweight for sure but an excellent flyer none the less.

Have a great day.

Thanks
Barry

(in reply to ottrod)
       Post #: 451

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 12:45:35 AM   
ottrod



Posts: 164
Joined: 1/15/2007
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the info Barry, I have the plane, but have not started the build yet. Before I start, I will see if there is any rh thrust in the firewall to start with. I did get the carbon wing tube, and plan on getting the gear as well. The engine will be a Brillelli 366gt 60cc.

If there is a firewall issue with the v2, I hope Tom chimes in and gets the problem solved for future shipments.

Thanks again for the suggestions,

Keith

(in reply to Barry Cazier)
       Post #: 452

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 12:49:47 AM   
Al Lewis


 

Posts: 1791
Joined: 7/5/2005
From: Port Orchard WA, USA
Status: offline
My thrust angle was dead on from the factory. Barry is the only one I know of that had issues. Tom can tell you what it should be.

_____________________________

Take Offs are Optional, Landings are Really Nerve Racking!! Al Lewis AMA #821623

(in reply to ottrod)
       Post #: 453

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 1:28:09 AM   
ottrod



Posts: 164
Joined: 1/15/2007
From: Wichita, KS, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lou55

My thrust angle was dead on from the factory. Barry is the only one I know of that had issues. Tom can tell you what it should be.


Thanks for your input. It is comforting that the thrust thing may not be a wide spread issue. I'll take a look at my firewall and post what I find.

(in reply to Al Lewis)
       Post #: 454

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 1:37:10 AM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 11571
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline
Good Lord, a 60cc engine on this plane will be a rocket!

_____________________________

If you can''''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to ottrod)
       Post #: 455

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 2:24:29 AM   
rctom



Posts: 5206
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline
I say leave it alone, I tested it and set it up the way I thought it would fly best.

TF

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 456

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 3:08:52 AM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 11571
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline
I've had a couple of them and still think they fly just fine out of the box. I have never, ever, seen a plane (and that's been a lot of planes) that's true neutral in every attitude and at every throttle position. It can't be done due to the many variable forces involved.

_____________________________

If you can''''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to rctom)
       Post #: 457

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 4:51:37 PM   
flyingfitz


 

Posts: 17
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Edwardsville, IL, USA
Status: offline
This may be obvious but ill say it anyway. The thrust angle is built into the firewall and not the motor box. If you measure the outside of the box you will see zero thrust angle. If you look at the firewall inside the box the angle is there at least on mine. I am relatively new to large scale but I think that the angle set by the builder is a good compromise.

I totall agree with the statement that the firewall is too soft. I ended up laminating a piece of 1/32 ply to the front and back of the firewall. I then added a little triangle stock and laminated a layer of 1 oz fiberglass cloth to the front of the firewall using thin then medium ca as resin. The box is more rigid and still lightweight. The firewall is like a piece of composite plate. I am using 1/2 in standoffs the same diameter as the DA standoffs with appropriate washers on the back. So far this setup is working great.

Fitz

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 458

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 6:27:48 PM   
Barry Cazier


 

Posts: 3341
Joined: 10/2/2003
From: Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pat Roy

I've had a couple of them and still think they fly just fine out of the box. I have never, ever, seen a plane (and that's been a lot of planes) that's true neutral in every attitude and at every throttle position. It can't be done due to the many variable forces involved.


I agree with you. Every plane has spots where you must overcome thrust or lift or????? However, my Edge came with zero RH thrust. Do you think that is right? I don't. I have 4 other gassers and many glow planes. Every single one of them came with some amount of RH thrust built into the firewall. I took Tom's advice when I built the plane (as shown again in above post) and just built the plane and flew it. In a hover I had to use FULL 3D rates and hold FULL RH rudder to maintain a hover. Even then I could barely keep the plane vertical. When I accelerated the plane wouldn't stay vertical, even with full rudder deflection.

After I modified the firewall and put in 1/4" RH thrust (and later even more with a washer) it holds a hover pretty much hands off with 1/2 throttle. When I go to full throttle it moves to the left slightly. I can deal with that with about 10% stick movement on the rudder. Much better flyer and much easier to fly. Sooooooooooooooooo...I stand by my comments that MY plane needed more RH thrust. Apparently I'm the only one. Lucky me.

That being said...I still like the plane very much. I'm getting the engine pretty much sorted out and it's starting to be fun to fly. But it's taken me a long time to get this plane set up properly.

Thanks
Barry

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 459

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 6:37:02 PM   
Barry Cazier


 

Posts: 3341
Joined: 10/2/2003
From: Idaho Falls, ID, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: flatlandmike

I am just a little bit

I had to add a lot of right thrust with 2 washers per left standoff on my da50 with the vess 23a i tried the rudder to throttle mix but i didnt like it . A ring stuck on my fitty and i had to rebrake in the engine i tried to go back to the menz 22x8 but the thrust was way off and i wasnt changing it for 2 weeks while i ran 5 gallons through so i just broke my fifty in on the vess23a.


I guess I'm not the only one that needed more RH thrust. Maybe there is only two of us.

thanks
Barry

(in reply to flatlandmike)
       Post #: 460

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 8:10:47 PM   
Al Lewis


 

Posts: 1791
Joined: 7/5/2005
From: Port Orchard WA, USA
Status: offline
Barry, I was referring to not having any thrust. Many planes require fine tuning of the thrust line. That's normal. A washer or two is not a thrust problem in my opinion.

< Message edited by Lou55 -- 11/8/2007 8:20:02 PM >


_____________________________

Take Offs are Optional, Landings are Really Nerve Racking!! Al Lewis AMA #821623

(in reply to Barry Cazier)
       Post #: 461

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 8:12:38 PM   
OverTheEdge


 

Posts: 353
Joined: 10/17/2004
From: Kewanee, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Barry Cazier


quote:

ORIGINAL: flatlandmike

I am just a little bit

I had to add a lot of right thrust with 2 washers per left standoff on my da50 with the vess 23a i tried the rudder to throttle mix but i didnt like it . A ring stuck on my fitty and i had to rebrake in the engine i tried to go back to the menz 22x8 but the thrust was way off and i wasnt changing it for 2 weeks while i ran 5 gallons through so i just broke my fifty in on the vess23a.


I guess I'm not the only one that needed more RH thrust. Maybe there is only two of us.

thanks
Barry


Make that three... I too am not complaining, just stating fact. Actually make that 4... my buddy also bought one of these when he saw mine. Though he has not added any right thrust yet, I did the maiden flight on his and noticed that more than the norm right rudder was needed when pulling verticle. Not enought to rebuild the firewall... just a washer or two should do the trick. On the same note though. We are not big 3-d flyers... more of just your weekend sport flyer that knows a few 3-d moves etc... so what little adjustment is need to our planes we might just live with it the way it is.


_____________________________

Keith
Ain't gravity a *itch!

(in reply to Barry Cazier)
       Post #: 462

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 8:53:32 PM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 11571
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline
I don't want to argue the point. I agree that a lot of people seem to need to have a thrust angle built into a plane for them to be able to fly better. The problem with that is now you have a plane that to be trimmed as well as possible requires that a lot of extra input is required to offset the built in angles. That can leave you with a plane that cannot be trimed out adequately in the opposite direction when the transimitter runs out of trim availability.

There are also a lot of people that prefer a zero-zero airframe to make it more predictable and easier to trim for various attitudes and power settings. If you check around the group that always seems to be bring home the bacon at contests you just might find that a lot of them start with a zero-zero airplane and adjust the trim settings at the transmitter over many flights to get them the way they need to be. The thrust angles that are built into many of todays arf are a compromise. Then again, if you received an Edge without any thrust angle at all then there was a minor error in the positioning of a part in a jig. No biggie since a good flyer or a good builder will adjust thrust angles to suit their particular needs with any plane they assemble or build.

Personally, I'd prefer that every plane was built with a zero-zero thrust angle, but I suppose that up to 1 degree down and 1-1/2 degree right would help a few people out. I don't think that should be for everyone but people get upset if they don't have it.

As for "soft" firewalls, unless you use a composite or metal for a firewall any type of wood will eventually compress under the pressure of small radius post mounts. Some woods will clearly compress more or less than others. Woods that compress the least over a period of time are also a lot heavier than what's currently used in most arfs on the market. Spreading the pressure loads of post type motor mounts with a large fender washer under the post is an easy and smart way to avoid wood compression for a longer period of time. Adding a coat of thinned epoxy prior to mounting an engine makes the wood last even longer. Using a heat gun to help thinned epoxy soak into the firewall makes it even harder.

We get a little too wrapped up in requiring a perfect appearance for a mounted engine that's generally hidden inside a cowl and forget that there are factors other than winning an internal beauty contest that are also important. It also ends up costing people a lot more money to assemble their planes by having to buy special length, color anodized motor mounts when a simple wood block drilled for the hole spacing would actually be a lot lighter, reduce airframe vibration, reduce firewall compression, are cheaper, lighter, and generally already availible in the shops of the airplane owner.

_____________________________

If you can''''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to OverTheEdge)
       Post #: 463

RE: 50cc Edge V2 has landed - 11/8/2007 8:59:29 PM