HighPlains
Posts: 2640
Joined: 3/2/2003 From: Over da rainbow,
KS, USA Status: offline
|
This is a question that I have wondered about for some time. The engine on your list that I drool over is the OS .15 CV, but at $110 it would be a bit much for a twin engine Goldberg Skylark that I would like to build. The AP engines are reported to have about zero power, which is too bad, because they are kind of cute, especially the .09 with the rear exhaust and BB. The OS LA and the TT 15 are both bushing engines. Really nothing wrong with bushings, that how my Corvette engine is built, but I do like the BB engines. The TT stuff seems very well made. OS has been at this for a long time too. It's a Ford or Chevy. The magnum looks good on paper. Power almost like the OS CV. But I have seen poor examples of their stuff in the past. I don't know whether to say it was a modeler that was a hack, or the engine, or the fuel he was using. They used to run a full page ad with a picture of a guy looking through an unassembled case with the caption "our perfection is boring". What made this a laugh was the tool chattering marks where they machined the case for the rear cover. Who knows where they are with todays stuff? Can't trust marketing anyway, it's their nature. The MVVS sounds good if you want to spin a small prop at high rpm's. My Nelson .15 is that way too, turning 25K on a 6-5. But not the engine for most airplanes where you need a 7-5 or 8-4 to match the airframe drag. It's not likely to get any better in the .15 size, I doubt you will see very much new development in this size. Electrics will see to that, and they will be pushing the .40's on all fronts in a very few years.
_____________________________
In politics if you want anything said, ask a man. If you want anything done, ask a woman - Margaret Thatcher
|