T.W.
Posts: 956
Joined: 10/25/2002 From: Way Up North , UNITED KINGDOM Status: offline
|
Michael Smith, Director of the National Model Aviation Museum at Muncie Indiana, responded to my request for further information about this mode. Her said this: It was acquired by the museum in 2001 but unfortunately we do not have that much information on it, nor any video. Mr. Delocvila, the designer, passed away from a heart-attack not long after this example flew and Mr. Sabato, hired by Mr. Delocvila as the model builder, did not follow up with the project. Supposedly Mr. Delocvila presented information to the US Patent Office, however I have not been able to locate anything. The purpose of the completed operational model would have been to promote the concept to full-scale aviation companies. From my understanding the aircraft was originally going to an urban transport aircraft, moving people around from building to building in large cities. That being said, the model is in a "military" scheme. This particular model, the only one built, was designed with the sole purpose of proving that the four sets of turning blades could produce lift. Each blade has a push rod connected to a cam in the center of each wheel. As was mentioned in one of the comments on the forum, the cam changes the pitch of each blade as it goes through the circle producing lift at the top. For this example a single engine turned all four sets of blades using a series of belts. When tested it was tethered. The first tests produced no lift and so Mr. Delocvila redesigned the cams. On subsequent tests the aircraft did hover. Later models were to have full control allowing the aircraft to fly forward, reverse, and side-to-side. Unfortunately we do not have any information on how this might have been achieved. Discussions have included adjusting the speed of each set of blades independently or adjusting the pitch of each set of blades independently. An additional power source located in the back of the aircraft providing forward thrust has also been mentioned based on the appearance of the model. And there you have it guys. I wish there was more information, but I guess not . . . . unless "you" have something else to pass-on? Tony
|