RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR announced  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


204oz Servo With Money Back Guarantee
Seller:  monstertruck2000
Details:   $28.95   |  11/2/2009   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros >> RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR announced
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 7:35 PM   
kev71h


 

Posts: 121
Score: 100
Joined: 6/3/2002
Last Login: 6/10/2009
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Status: offline
subscribe

_____________________________

"If you got it....race it"

Hide Signatures

(in reply to arobatx)
       Post #: 176

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR an... - 2/23/2007 7:58 PM   
Gary Arthur



Posts: 999
Score: 100
Joined: 1/2/2002
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: Hamilton, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dsnyder

No, the module is decoding the info from the TX and only decodes 8 channels. Futaba systems do not do that, they don't have more than 8 channels in PPM mode at this time.


If I am not mistaken, the update for the 14mz includes a 12 channel PPM update. This would give 12 channels in PPM. Here is the info from the the update.

2. Model select
2-1. Back to starting up screen when changed the model.
2-2. Back to starting up screen when new model is made.

3. PPM modulation (for Europe and USA version only)
3-1. Added the modulation polarity selection at PPM mode.
3-2. Added 12 channels PPM mode.

The additional dialog box appears when set the PPM modulation. Push the upper side button to select the PPM polarity. The Standard PPM corresponds to FUTABA receivers. Push lower side button to select the PPM channels. There are 3 kinds of selections, 8ch PPM, 12ch PPM (N 1.5), 12ch PPM (N 1.3). N means neutral pulse width.



Hide Signatures

(in reply to dsnyder)
       Post #: 177

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR an... - 2/23/2007 8:00 PM   
dubd



Posts: 217
Score: 105
Joined: 8/6/2007
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Status: offline
Given that the 14/12MZ can transmits 12 channels on PPM, are we still restricted to 8 channels with the module? Can a Horizon rep answer this question?

On a side note, Futaba needs to get their butts in gear. Their 2.4ghz release is pathetic.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Gary Arthur)
       Post #: 178

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:03 PM   
nonstoprc



Posts: 1255
Score: 100
Joined: 9/9/2003
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: Round Rock, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hi Mike,

ServoSync probably is one of the best features out of a Spektrum radio system. Just wonder how bad it can be for two elevators to keep in sync WITHOUT the servoSync feature in a Spektrum module system? Do we get the same delayed response of one of the halves as in a Futaba 9C radio?

Can servoSync be added to the Spektrum module product?

--qc

< Message edited by nonstoprc -- 2/23/2007 8:16 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mike Sieniarecki)
       Post #: 179

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:13 PM   
nonstoprc



Posts: 1255
Score: 100
Joined: 9/9/2003
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: Round Rock, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:


One more note on this issue, if an FHSS system hops to a Spektrum dedicated channel for the stated 2mS, the signal will not have Spektrum’s patented Global Unique Identifier (GUID) which is required by the receiver to operate; this virtually eliminates the chance of a stray signal from interfering with the Spektrum system.


Hi Mike,

I asume in that 2ms, the Skecktrum receiver will discard the futaba signal and maintain the same servo position(s), Right? I believe this type of response is true for any other type of interferencing FHSS signals.

If 2ms is not long enough to trigger the fail-safe feature, what is the duration (in ms or sec) of interference that will trigger it?

Does the 80 channels that Spektrum uses cover the entire 2.4Ghz band (i.e., from 2400mhz to 2483.5 mhz)?

Thanks, -qc

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mike Sieniarecki)
       Post #: 180

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR an... - 2/23/2007 8:19 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: riotgear

Given that the 14/12MZ can transmits 12 channels on PPM, are we still restricted to 8 channels with the module? Can a Horizon rep answer this question?

On a side note, Futaba needs to get their butts in gear. Their 2.4ghz release is pathetic.


riotgear,

The Spektrum air modules designed to fit Futaba radios, both traditional and MZ series, only use the eight PPM channels available.



_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to dubd)
       Post #: 181

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:21 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: nonstoprc

Hi Mike,

ServoSync probably is one of the best features out of a Spektrum radio system. Just wonder how bad it can be for two elevators to keep in sync WITHOUT the servoSync feature in a Spektrum module system? Do we get the same delayed response of one of the halves as in a Futaba 9C radio?

Can servoSync be added to the Spektrum module product?

--qc


Nonstoprc,

Love the user name BTW 

ServoSync is a software based feature, and it can’t be added to the module system. I hear you though, it would be nice. I guess we can’t have it all, well for now anyway hee hee

Take care,



_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to nonstoprc)
       Post #: 182

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:24 PM   
Fly Dog


 

Posts: 2
Score: 100
Joined: 10/26/2006
Last Login: 7/9/2009
From: Not Applicable, GERMANY
Status: offline
Hello! i have see the new Recivers from Spektrum in the Bulettin,an i hope i can find any Answers? Then this Recivers going for the JR X-3810 too, Is the Distance the same with org.Recivers nearly one Mile?,what for SPMC,PCM,PPM is going? Sorry for my Bad English!!,im come from Germany and i have not reed the kompl.Thread! Thanks bevor Karl from Germany?

Hide Signatures

(in reply to nonstoprc)
       Post #: 183

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:25 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nonstoprc

quote:


One more note on this issue, if an FHSS system hops to a Spektrum dedicated channel for the stated 2mS, the signal will not have Spektrum’s patented Global Unique Identifier (GUID) which is required by the receiver to operate; this virtually eliminates the chance of a stray signal from interfering with the Spektrum system.


Hi Mike,

I asume in that 2ms, the Skecktrum receiver will discard the futaba signal and maintain the same servo position(s), Right? I believe this type of response is true for any other type of interferencing FHSS signals.

If 2ms is not long enough to trigger the fail-safe feature, what is the duration (in ms or sec) of interference that will trigger it?

Does the 80 channels that Spektrum uses cover the entire 2.4Ghz band (i.e., from 2400mhz to 2483.5 mhz)?

Thanks, -qc


Nonstoprc,

Correct on the first statement.

We have not tested the Futaba system, so its hard to say how theirs will perform yet.

Fail safe, at least with Spektrum systems, is based on a certain amount of data packets lost, so that time is no where near that.

Our Spektrum system is limited to 80 channels within the band.


< Message edited by Mike Sieniarecki -- 2/23/2007 8:27 PM >



_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to nonstoprc)
       Post #: 184

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:33 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fly Dog

Hello! i have see the new Recivers from Spektrum in the Bulettin,an i hope i can find any Answers? Then this Recivers going for the JR X-3810 too, Is the Distance the same with org.Recivers nearly one Mile?,what for SPMC,PCM,PPM is going? Sorry for my Bad English!!,im come from Germany and i have not reed the kompl.Thread! Thanks bevor Karl from Germany?


Fly Dog,

Hi from the other side of the planet.

Yes, the module system will work with that radio, and you can expect the distance to be the same or better than your current range.


_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Fly Dog)
       Post #: 185

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:36 PM   
JuanPu


 

Posts: 61
Score: 100
Joined: 9/28/2005
Last Login: 1/8/2009
From: Madrid, SPAIN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nonstoprc
Hi Mike,

I asume in that 2ms, the Skecktrum receiver will discard the futaba signal and maintain the same servo position(s), Right? I believe this type of response is true for any other type of interferencing FHSS signals.

If 2ms is not long enough to trigger the fail-safe feature, what is the duration (in ms or sec) of interference that will trigger it?

Does the 80 channels that Spektrum uses cover the entire 2.4Ghz band (i.e., from 2400mhz to 2483.5 mhz)?

Thanks, -qc



1 - The fact that a Futaba FHSS radio coincides in frequency with the DX7 does not necesarily mean that the signal is lost for the DX7.

This is a neat property of DSSS: the data is scrambled with an apparent noise that only the receiver is able to remove with the same code that was used to generate it. If another signal is added to the received one, this only slightly worsens the S/N ratio in a "graceful degradation" that may, or may not, result in bit errors that are easily corrected with the extra parity bits that travel with the data (sort of ECC bits in PC memories), or that just means a packet is discarded in the worst case. The final result is that the mean data rate may slightly decrease, but there still is plenty of room for RC.

Of course there is a "near-far" problem where the added signal, if much stronger than the desired one, may totally obsure this last one. But this should not happen with the planes flying and both signal sources on the ground.

2 - Futaba with its FHSS may on the other side totally loss a packet while conciding with a DX7 channel, until it hops, since it uses "narrow bands across a wide band".

3 - The problem that I see here, and I'd like to see addressed by Horizon/Spektrum is:

Could a Futaba FHSS travelling across all the existing bands be able to preclude a Spektrum DSM2 system finding a couple of free channels at power on?

This is a very easy test that must surely have been done in the past months.



< Message edited by JuanPu -- 2/23/2007 8:43 PM >


_____________________________

Regards,
Juan

Hide Signatures

(in reply to nonstoprc)
       Post #: 186

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:43 PM   
visioneer_one



Posts: 2425
Score: 100
Joined: 12/12/2001
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
Status: offline
This is quite a popular thread.

I wonder if the modules will work with a Japanese-spec 12X? (grins, ducks & runs)

_____________________________

The statement below is false.
The statement above is true.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JuanPu)
       Post #: 187

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 8:49 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JuanPu

Could a Futaba FHSS travelling across all the existing bands be able to preclude a Spektrum DSM2 system finding a couple of free channels at power on?




JuanPu,

The Spektrum system will simply continue to scan until it finds two unused channels. In other words, The Spektrum system will not acquire any channel that is not free at the time of scanning, so the FHSS will not affect SPM when it is turned on.



_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to JuanPu)
       Post #: 188

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 9:06 PM   
JuanPu


 

Posts: 61
Score: 100
Joined: 9/28/2005
Last Login: 1/8/2009
From: Madrid, SPAIN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Sieniarecki
JuanPu,

The Spektrum system will simply continue to scan until it finds two unused channels. In other words, The Spektrum system will not acquire any channel that is not free at the time of scanning, so the FHSS will not affect SPM when it is turned on.



I have not expressed myself right. The question is:

If for instance, while looking for a free channel, the Spektrum waits in each channel more time than the used by a FHSS system to scan the whole set of channels, it could see a collision and discard this channel. And this would happen for each channel, precluding the Spektrum operation.

If the Spektrum system does not wait for such a long time in each channel, and/or if, on the other side, it waits in every channel enough time as to allow hopping of the other radio, this problem should not happen.

I don't ask for a technical explanation of the proprietary algorithm used, just if Spektrum switching on in the presence of a Futaba FHSS system has been tested or not, and what were the results.

Thanks in advance.


< Message edited by JuanPu -- 2/23/2007 9:13 PM >


_____________________________

Regards,
Juan

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mike Sieniarecki)
       Post #: 189

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 9:10 PM   
pappy35


 

Posts: 392
Score: 100
Joined: 10/30/2006
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: Liberty Township, OH, USA
Status: offline
Does't the FCC require that, in order to operate in that piece of spectrum (note correct, not brand, spelling), the transmitter not emit on a channel that's already occupied? If correct, this removes this entire line of spekulation and assures me that I don't have to worry about a Futaba radio squashing my signal for that 2ms.


_____________________________

Al


Hide Signatures

(in reply to JuanPu)
       Post #: 190

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 9:14 PM   
Bob Pastorello



Posts: 5857
Score: 100
Joined: 2/23/2002
Last Login: 11/8/2009
From: El Reno, OK, USA
Status: offline
That's it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pappy35

Does't the FCC require that, in order to operate in that piece of spectrum (note correct, not brand, spelling), the transmitter not emit on a channel that's already occupied? If correct, this removes this entire line of spekulation and assures me that I don't have to worry about a Futaba radio squashing my signal for that 2ms.



_____________________________

Bob Pastorello - rcaerobob@cox.net - "You may as well try what someone else says won''t work...they''re probably afraid to..

Hide Signatures

(in reply to pappy35)
       Post #: 191

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR an... - 2/23/2007 9:15 PM   
d_wheel



Posts: 572
Score: 100
Joined: 1/27/2003
Last Login: 10/13/2009
From: Deep in the Heart Of, TX,
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Sieniarecki


quote:

ORIGINAL: riotgear

Given that the 14/12MZ can transmits 12 channels on PPM, are we still restricted to 8 channels with the module? Can a Horizon rep answer this question?

On a side note, Futaba needs to get their butts in gear. Their 2.4ghz release is pathetic.


riotgear,

The Spektrum air modules designed to fit Futaba radios, both traditional and MZ series, only use the eight PPM channels available.



My 14mz has 12 ppm channels. When are you going to produce a module and receiver that will let me use them?

Later;

D.W.

_____________________________

Gettin'' old ain''t for sissies.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mike Sieniarecki)
       Post #: 192

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 9:19 PM   
NormS


 

Posts: 36
Score: 100
Joined: 6/15/2006
Last Login: 11/7/2009
From: Hopkinton, MA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Sieniarecki


Mike, I think everyone agrees that DSSS and FHSS systems work well with each other once they are up and running, but I have read on other forums that frequency hopping systems like Futaba's interfere with Spektrum's ability to find two clear channels and link up the transmitter and the receiver at startup. I have no idea if this is fact or rumor; can you please specifically address this issue?. BTW, if it helps, Futaba's announcement says that their system hops every 2mS. If it uses all 160 channels, does this mean that on average, once every 160mS a single Futaba system will "hit" a Spektrum system on one of its two channels?
Thanks a lot.


quote:



NormS,

I’m not sure this is a true rumor; however, I do think sometimes by simply asking the question, it can create unclear answers until someone can help educate on the issue. So, in this case, I will speak to the Spektrum side of the issue to hep clear up the uncertianty.

When the Spektrum radio is turned on, it searches the 80 available channels. As we know Spektrum allocates two of those 80 channels for redundancy. If the scan sees any one of the 80 in use (say a Futaba system or other for example), it will continue to scan until it finds two dedicated, unused channels. If the system is unable to find two dedicated, unused channels when turned on, it will not transmit until two become available. So in essence, the answer specifically to your question is no, there will not be interference from Futaba or other with the Spektrum system.

One more note on this issue, if an FHSS system hops to a Spektrum dedicated channel for the stated 2mS, the signal will not have Spektrum’s patented Global Unique Identifier (GUID) which is required by the receiver to operate; this virtually eliminates the chance of a stray signal from interfering with the Spektrum system.

Does this help, or did I make it more confusing LOL?



Mike, please understand that I have no axe to grind here, I'm simply looking for information. In that regard, your response has helped me understand how the things work, and I guess that the worst thing that should happen is that a Spektrum system may take a little longer to sync up in the presence of hopping systems, but only if it happens to be checking a channel that a Futaba system has hopped on to, and only if it sees the collision as interference.

Concerning the GUID business, I'm sure that the unique ID code will keep a receiver from responding to a non-errored frame from a different transmitter. The question, however, is what happens if someone hops on to one of the Spektrum's channels, and I think the answer is simple radio theory: they will interfere with each other on the RF level to an extent dependent on the relative signals strengths of the two signals at the receiver(s); both transmit frames are likely to be affected. This is the way radio transmission works, regardless of the frequency or modulation (AM, FM, PM, etc). However, this should not be a big deal because it sounds like the Spektrum system will ignore the bad frame and probably just use the good frame from its second channel. The hopping system may or may not lose a frame, depending on how many bits it lost and the amount of foward error correction it has. Some might consider Spektrum to be a more robust solution, but this comes at the expense of higher bandwidth utilization.

Thanks a lot.
Norm S


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Mike Sieniarecki)
       Post #: 193

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 9:52 PM   
Flyfast1


 

Posts: 481
Score: 100
Joined: 9/25/2005
Last Login: 11/6/2009
From: Livermore, CA, USA
Status: offline
Juan and others,

Some of these issues depend on whether the Futaba system hops on all available channels in the band. This may not be the case, but I do not know exactly how their system works. Many other wireless communications systems that use frequency hopping don't use all the available channels, only a subset of "good" channels. For example, the systems will build a table of "good" channels, i.e., channels that have less than a threshold level of noise, and then select a subset of those channels to use in the hopping scheme. Some wireless communications systems also use a set of non-overlapping channels in the band, which is considerably fewer than all of the channels in the band. In this situation, even with several Futaba systems operating, there would be available channels for Spektrum systems to use.

-Ed


quote:

ORIGINAL: JuanPu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Sieniarecki
JuanPu,

The Spektrum system will simply continue to scan until it finds two unused channels. In other words, The Spektrum system will not acquire any channel that is not free at the time of scanning, so the FHSS will not affect SPM when it is turned on.



I have not expressed myself right. The question is:

If for instance, while looking for a free channel, the Spektrum waits in each channel more time than the used by a FHSS system to scan the whole set of channels, it could see a collision and discard this channel. And this would happen for each channel, precluding the Spektrum operation.

If the Spektrum system does not wait for such a long time in each channel, and/or if, on the other side, it waits in every channel enough time as to allow hopping of the other radio, this problem should not happen.

I don't ask for a technical explanation of the proprietary algorithm used, just if Spektrum switching on in the presence of a Futaba FHSS system has been tested or not, and what were the results.

Thanks in advance.




Hide Signatures

(in reply to JuanPu)
       Post #: 194

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 10:14 PM   
Peter_OZ



Posts: 5527
Score: 108
Joined: 6/5/2002
Last Login: 11/4/2009
From: BrisbaneQueensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
dunno about in the US but down here we are seeing a loty of guys losing planes while using the DX5 & 7. One guy has lost 4 planes and the agent replaced RX and TX several times while trying to help him out.

These are not inexperienced fliers either but guys who know their stuff. On the other hand other users have not had a problem!

I'll sit back and let the technology mature a bit longer I think

_____________________________

fun police have struck again

Hide Signatures

(in reply to RCadmin)
       Post #: 195

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 10:17 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline
Sorry guys, I was in a meeting :-/

Regarding the last several threads: I will do my best to try and answer them here in one post…

The only testing we have done with our systems directly to a Futaba product was at E-fest two weeks ago when the Futaba guys were using their new system. Of course, as expected there were no issues. Without a system to test, it’s hard to tell you we have compared side by side specifically with a Futaba in hand. However, I can tell (and it was stated in a couple posts back) there is an FCC mandate for how the two technologies (FHSS & DSSS) are to co-exist in the same environment. I would have to assume Futaba (a very large and very respectable company) has done their homework. They do have an FCC grant, which tells me they are within the guidelines for this technology.

Back to the GUID business…They will not interfere. Because the amount of information that is sent is so many times faster than what we are used to on 72MHz, and for the short amount of time the hopping happens, not enough information is lost to affect the signal, and once again, the GUID is not read, so the receivers ignores the stray signal altogether.

The bottom line: with the knowledge of FCC mandated regulations on 2.4GHz, if followed by manufacturers, there will be no interference between brands.

Note: these explanations are in basic terms that are relevant to most modelers. If anyone is interested in further techy terms or very detailed electronics information on 2.4GHz, I would suggest checking out some of the websites that explain all of the academic parts of the technology.

Is this helping?



_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to NormS)
       Post #: 196

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR ann... - 2/23/2007 10:22 PM   
TeePee


 

Posts: 61
Score: 105
Joined: 12/9/2001
Last Login: 4/27/2007
From: Palmetto, GA, USA
Status: offline
Will the Futaba module work with the Super 8.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Robbidos)
       Post #: 197

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 10:23 PM   
Thomas B


 

Posts: 658
Score: 106
Joined: 7/14/2002
Last Login: 10/27/2009
From: Fort Worth, TX, USA
Status: offline
I'd like to ask the Spektrum folks a direct question:

What is the rational behind having the stock tx antennas removed as part of the Spektrum module conversion.

I fly one of the homebrew DX6 modules in my Futaba 9CAP. It has the 2.4 tx antenna mounted on the back side of the module, pointing up.

I did extensive range testing with and without my stock 72 TX antenna in place while testing the DX6 module conversion...it made no difference. I always fly it with the stock 72 tx antenna still in the TX, retracted.

It would make switching back and forth from 2.4 to 72 much easier if the stock 72 antenna removal was not part of the process......

< Message edited by Thomas B -- 2/23/2007 10:34 PM >


_____________________________

Electric Coolhunter

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Peter_OZ)
       Post #: 198

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR ann... - 2/23/2007 10:27 PM   
Mike Sieniarecki



Posts: 69
Score: 100
Joined: 12/21/2004
Last Login: 5/6/2009
From: Mahomet, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeePee

Will the Futaba module work with the Super 8.


yes sir


_____________________________

Michael J. Sieniarecki
Marketing Manager, Radio Category
Horizon Hobby, Inc.
msieniarecki@horizonhobby.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to TeePee)
       Post #: 199

RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR anno... - 2/23/2007 10:28 PM   
Peter_OZ



Posts: 5527
Score: 108
Joined: 6/5/2002
Last Login: 11/4/2009
From: BrisbaneQueensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
my understanding is the the chs reside on sub audible tones which are generated on the main carrier freq.

TX sniffs the band to see what of these chs / sub audibles are free then locks onto it. All users including non hobby users are on the same carriers, just the sub audible freq that differ.

From what I have read the DX technology does not use the military freq hopping mode as it would cause inherant delays as it hopped about but uses the direct sequence method of picking the best 2 available chs from what ever is available in the band.

We have been using this technology for some time in airports for data tarsfer for cargo systems, flight manifest / tech manual / unservicilbity log transfers to from aircraft and for bagage handling and reconciliation. One of the main problems faced is drop outs due to progation issues and reflections away from the intended antennas to be used. Normal practice is to use highly directional high gain antennas pointed out to specific taxi ways etc to minimise drop outs. In baggage ares omni type antennas are used but drop out and error rates are quite high but it is not that critical.

If this type of drop out occurs on a model the result is a crash.

Others have raised the issue of incompatible systems using opposing algorithims causing lock out issues. Now if the field happens to reside near an area with a high propensity of either DSSS or FHSS such as large wharehouse full of Symbol hand held scanners etc then this could be a real issue.

my thoughts are that this technology has been pushed onto us with out really looking at the implications.

I would hate to think of the ramifications if a huge 3 D plane went beserk at an airshow and went into the crowd. Tort litigators would have a field day.

_____________________________

fun police have struck again

Hide Signatures

(in reply to NormS)
       Post #: 200

Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  
All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros >> RE: Spektrum DSM2 2.4Ghz modules for Futaba and JR announced
Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America

Kaango.com Classifieds


1.938RCU1