RE: BME 115 Any Field Reports?  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Gas Engines >> RE: BME 115 Any Field Reports?
Page: <<   < prev  32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 3:52:47 PM   
dbcaster


 

Posts: 333
Joined: 7/1/2006
From: Petaluma, CA, USA
Status: offline
Wow another fix?? I remember both of you guys so strongly saying your BME 115's were running perfect. Why would you need to fix something that was perfect???? I just can't seem to figure that one out.

(in reply to Dangerous Dan)
       Post #: 826

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 5:06:45 PM   
PATRICKP


 

Posts: 28
Joined: 3/26/2007
From: danville, PA, USA
Status: offline
The devises have to be manufactured to fix the problems.

Do you think you can make this kit with out manufacturing it?

Do think everyone can make this kit? ( NO )

You'll need at least have a mill,lasers and or a water jet, TIG welder and or a aluminum casting manufacture.

gasket material maker here too ,stainless steel sheets,aluminum plates of sizes needed.drill presses.

You know how to do it with out costing money?

Well you are wrong about that!

It won't do most any good at all, because it will cost them way to much money for a 1 off of anything.

( Helping all owners get it fixed at a low cost is good! )

So what about money issues on the thread? you go do it all for free! give your money away! I have given allot away so far.

All others not a penny so far to anyone, but allot of bull ---- here on this site.

Can't you read? some of these same people have Kris Welter off the site.

Others that received the test kits need to get in the air soon and prove kit is worth the investment.

Go fly!







(in reply to dbcaster)
       Post #: 827

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 5:11:45 PM   
RTK


 

Posts: 4089
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: CENTRAL , CA, USA
Status: offline
Thank You Pat I could not have said it better.

dbcaster---I can make this engine run fine at any AOA with both carbs (un-modified). I have yet to try the genII modifications but Keith has stated it works and so have other people. The problem is that if you are running a non modified carb and set it up to run perfect in the mid range (no burble in AOA changes) you will be a little to lean on the top. It will work fine for 3D but if you like to make prop noise and run a few race tracks while doing this it will go lean. The cylinders with its six passages really flows when the engine unloads in the air.

Now for the problem and solution from my point of view. Altavillan is going at it from a different approach, but there is always more than one way to skin a cat and I have no idea of what PATRICKP'S set-up is like.

Problem--The engine going lean at WOT if the engine is set for a clean mid range. This is because the high speed circuit starts feeding to soon and when you lean it to correct this you put yourself lean on the top end.
Solution--With Keith's modification to the WB the tendency for the high to feed too soon is reduced, thus allowing you to keep a rich enough mixture on the top end. (Again I have not run one but others have said it works)
OR
A three needle carb--(which I did not make, but will eventually test)
Briefly how this works. A third needle is added which only feeds when the throttle is about 3/4 or better. The old high needle becomes your mid range and the low stay as the low. This way you will never be lean on the high and can infinitely adjust low, mid, and high. If functions as said, it will work great for any engine on the market.
OR
Another approach would be to link the throttle arm to the needle as in the MVVS 116, but I feel a true 3 needle carb is best.
OR
Link the high needle to a servo and slave it to the throttle so it adjusts for mid and WOT depending on the throttle position.
OR
A whole host of other possible solutions that could work.

One more thing to be said about the modification Keith is currently doing. When adjusting the carb you do not need to be as lean as possible on the low like you normally would with most other engines. You should go rich on the low needle it will not affect the mid range, thus allowing you to adjust the high a little leaner with the low compensating for this.
With the un-modified carb I go rich on the low and leaner on the high. The first carb (WGA) did not have the tendency to load in mid range as bad as the (WB) but it still would go a tab lean on the high if you flew WOT for extended periods of time.

editing to be done when time permits.

< Message edited by RTK -- 10/2/2007 6:59:24 PM >

(in reply to dbcaster)
       Post #: 828

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 7:06:33 PM   
Rocky V.



Posts: 228
Joined: 10/5/2004
From: Alameda, CA, USA
Status: offline
On an unrelated topic (snicker snicker),
Are the exhaust flanges the same on the 110 and the 115 ? Same mufflers ?

_____________________________

Victim of Gravity...

(in reply to RTK)
       Post #: 829

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 7:20:42 PM   
Hammbone



Posts: 1437
Joined: 1/5/2002
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline
Yes, same mufflers.

Jim

(in reply to Rocky V.)
       Post #: 830

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 10:17:35 PM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 12358
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: online
DB,

You and I discussed exactly this same issue with people having problems with the 115 a long time ago. About the time I publically witdrew my support for the 115. One of the reasons for my withdrawl was due to mid range issues suddenly cropping up in RTK's engine after he made some changes in his baffles. That's when I saw that you had to be pretty good at setting up a carb and understood how airflow effects things inside a cowl. Because of that, and knowing the the vast majority of the people do not have that understanding and could easily have problems tuning their engines. A good many have trouble balancing a plane because they think that all the parts have to drop into the numbered slots for that part, or fit in the same manner as the guy's that posted a picture on an internet site.

Add to the above the fact that there were a fairly high number of flat out defective carbs that were supplied by either Walbro, or other distributor. That made life impossible for many and is inexscusable on the part of Walbro. Not on the part of BME. he, like his customers, placed faith in the quality of another manufacturer's product and was severly let down in doing so. Every manufacturer bench runs and engine. If it works there it should work everywhere. No manufacturer mounts every engine up in a plane and flys it. The original engines and associated components worked fine in flight, so the same engines made with the same parts should have worked equally well on customer's aircraft. The fact is, many did not.

The fact is that a very large percentage of the people currently flying 3D r/c are plug and play types. PC Gamers have a lot of talent in hand-eye coordination and manage to pick up r/c flying quite fast. They don't need to know how it works, only how to move the sticks to get it to do what they want it to do. If it doesn't work out of the box they are stymied and blame everything and everybody for their lack of technical understanding and ability. That's not knocking them in any way, but the truth just the same. Those that have true engine experience, building experience, and have done all the work with their own hands are fewer everyday. That means that the manufacturers have to "dumb it down" for a large number of people to be able to play where they feel the need to play. Not a bad thing, but the lack of knowledge and experience of many makes it a lot tougher for manufacturers to produce truly high performance products.

It also means that there are fewer of us available with the required knowledge to help others along. Most of those can make any engine run, and run well, with everyday off the shelf items and a little positioning of parts. As for the fixes RTK and Altavillan are working with, both will be simple carb swaps. One you can probably pick up at a yard sale or small engine shop for $10.00 or less and go play, and the other a brand new design in carbs. Let the guys run with it for a bit longer. They WILL get back to you.

PatrickP

I still stand with what I said in an earlier post. If your product works as well and reliably as you said it does I will order one myself. Proof first, orders later. Because you say it works is not good enough for me to send you my money. As an example, I have a diamond in my hand and I know it's worth $4,000.00 so I'll sell it sight unseen to the first person with $3,500.00. That ain't gonna happen unless someone is absolutely stupid. I have no problems with you or your ideas, but I don't much care for the way you approach things. If you want to do business, be a businessman, not an instigator. I have not attacked you or your product in any way. If I had you would have felt it a lot more intensely than you perceive to have done so. I feel that your call to have me and others banned is uncalled for. This is still a free speech country unless something's changed while I've been away defending it.

Patrick Roy

< Message edited by Pat Roy -- 10/2/2007 10:49:48 PM >


_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to Hammbone)
       Post #: 831

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 10:44:39 PM   
texomalaser



Posts: 269
Joined: 9/26/2005
From: sherman, TX, USA
Status: offline
Man..This is ridiculous..All I want is a fix for my stupid big bore Walbro carb on my 115. I already know how to work on engines because this is what I do everyday. If I had the time to experiment myself whether I had to use a CNC, Laser or metal casting stuff and I came up with a fix I would tell everyone how to do it. After that its their problem if they didnt have the equipment to do it. But at least they have the chance. If I didnt want to do that I would build a simple website with a Pay-Pal button on it and sell it.. I would pay for advertisement on other RC related sites also linking it to my site. Patrick I think its great you have come up with this idea and fix for the 115 carb. But like I said in an earlier post Bro. there is a place besides this thread for that. But I dont see anything wrong with mentioning you have the fix and providing a link here to your website if you had one, or in the classifieds section. But the way you are doing it is like rubbing dirt in our eyes. The hand full of guys on here are not looking for an $80.00 repair kit unless all else fails. I guess what I am saying is that there is a lot of things I could buy to solve my problems but I have built a lot of things to do that too. Im not hating on you at all. Its cool as H--L that you came up with this and it must have took a lot of work. But do you have to rub it in with a Na Na Na Na Boo Boo type thing?
I can build you a great Website advertising your product. I have been an HTML Author for about 12 years and built about 8 websites. So if you want to holler at me I can build you one for your product to sale.

Scott S.

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 832

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 11:03:54 PM   
Hammbone



Posts: 1437
Joined: 1/5/2002
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline
Guys, I'm sorry for the delay in testing Patrick's "fix", but I'm still waiting on a replacement rudder for my plane. The rudder was damaged on yet another BME 115 dead stick landing. I'm hoping the rudder will be here within a week or two. It's coming from Germany.
I promise to give an unbiased report on how this "fix" works and if I think it is worth $80.
Please just be patient a little longer. I'm just as frustrated as the rest of you are.

Also, please quit bashing Patrick. I don't think he is trying to make money off of us, but rather trying to recoup the money he has already invested into this, and to get enough orders to justify the cost of making a mold to mass produce his product.
Would you rather he never even told us of the possible "fix"?

Just wait a little while longer and I should be able to tell you how his "fix" worked on my engine. If it works good, I will say so, and if it doesn't help, I will say that it didn't help. After seeing it and installing it on my engine, I am optomistic that it is going to help.

Jim

(in reply to texomalaser)
       Post #: 833

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 11:04:25 PM   
Tired Old Man


 

Posts: 12358
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: online
The engine is over carbureated. It needs a smaller carb, or a large carb with some specific changes introduced to balance everything. That's what's being experimented with as we speak. As I said before, when either or both Altavillan and RTK have finished testing they will tell you what you need, or need to do, to make everything peachy. Neither wants to provide less than a complete answer. Yes, it's been a long time since the engine came out. Yes, there have been problems, No, there have not been definitive answers. Yes, there have been fixes that did not fix, and I don't believe we need any more of those. I have one at home too and am just as anxious to get it right as everyone else. I've had the engine and a 2.6m Yak 55 waiting to fly for a year now and I really would like to fly them. Had the plane had anything other than a round cowl I would have flown it to near death already. Yes, I can easily afford another engine but I don't want to. I want the one I have to be right. If I buy another engine it will because I have another plane to put it in, and in that I have several.

A few more days should not be critical or matter. I don't think for a moment either one of them is going to shut down their business and devote that time to modeling. Just the same, they should have all the answers in a week or so, weather permitting.

I know that both RTK and Altavillan had great running engines because I was there and fly with both of them frequently. I was there for the first flights of RTK's 115 and it flew and ran just fine. I was the one that was doing consecutive reversing knife edge flights at medium throttle with RTK's Sukhoi and 115 with no problems. I flew it inverted at various throttle settings with no problems. I've hovered the plane without concern of an engine failure. I've watched Altavillan do things at such low throttle settings as to be unbelievable with any engine and his 115 runs just great. Both of those engines were with the original carb. I KNOW that the engine is just fine.

_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to texomalaser)
       Post #: 834

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 11:23:15 PM   
texomalaser



Posts: 269
Joined: 9/26/2005
From: sherman, TX, USA
Status: offline
Pat..Thats what I think the problem is..Too big of a carb.Plus that Walbro is just goofy..I got a big Tilltson thats made for a 110 cc engine but the mounts are not wide enough...Any ideas about that?

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 835

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/2/2007 11:53:40 PM   
RTK


 

Posts: 4089
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: CENTRAL , CA, USA
Status: offline
I really don't think the engine is over carbureated. (I have been wrong in the past though) Reason is,,,,,,, I have the smaller SDC carb on my 110 and at WOT it would also go slightly lean, I did some adjusting to the carb (drilling) and so far it is fine.
The 110/115 is the only 100cc class engine to run six ports (to my knowledge) and when given a chance to unload in the air it seems to really draw. The 115 will rip a prop louder than any other engine in its class, believe me I like that noise and I can tell.

Texo & Ham--- I still believe if you use the carb modified by Keith and lean the high while also richening the low you should be able to make the mid fine with out sacrificing leaning at WOT. But I have never run Keith's mod. Adjusting the needles for the 115/110 are counter to the way we have always adjusted them for other engines in the past.
As Pat has mentioned in the previous post. I have had mine running fine WITHOUT ANY MODS , but it was too lean for my liking on the high.

< Message edited by RTK -- 10/3/2007 12:06:50 AM >

(in reply to Tired Old Man)
       Post #: 836

RE: BME 115 Any Fiel... - 10/3/2007 12:43:54 AM   
dbcaster


 

Posts: 333
Joined: 7/1/2006
From: Petaluma, CA, USA
Status: offline
Pat,
I just finished building a 30% Edge kit and I am in the process of building a 40% kit not arfs. I raced a two stroke jet ski for three years. I adjusted my carb before each race. I have adjusted many glow engines and five other gas engines. I also played around with a Davis Diesel conversion for awhile. I have never felt the need to state my experience level but when it always comes back to not being able to adjust the carb right it gets a bit frustrating. I had well over a dozen dead sticks with the 115 in 5 gallons on flight time. I replaced it with a 3W with no vent tube, no snorkel, and no air deflections. I ran seven gallons through that setup and had one dead stick because my fuel tank came loose and dumped all my fuel in the fuse, that was it. My point is, it was stated that the 115 ran perfect and suggested that the rest of us just don't know how to adjust a carb. Now they are working on fixes for an engine that was said to run perfect. Me, I would not touch something that is perfect especially an engine in a plane costing a couple thousand dollars. Could there actually be an issue with their engines as well??? I don't think they will say so since there is obviously a tie with Kieth involved here. I do agree that Kieth is a great guy but as some others have said, the 115 is just not ready for prime time. I am glad to see that some are interested and have the patience to work out the problems. That is great and useful. But just admit that there is an issue and continue on.

(in reply to RTK)
       Post #: 837