RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> Quique's Aircraft Support >> RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54
Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/10/2008 5:07:26 AM   
Texas_Flyer


 

Posts: 98
Joined: 9/13/2005
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
Glasscock and Glover,

Thanks to both of you for the feedback.

Alan

(in reply to glover1482)
       Post #: 351

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 9/11/2008 4:07:59 PM   
mobilemenice80


 

Posts: 22
Joined: 5/13/2006
From: pinckney, MI, USA
Status: offline
reza...

need a little help

i have an o.s. 2.00 fourstroke. it weighs slightly less then the o.s. 1.20 (straight form os website and tower)

i plan on buying my 6th qq yak but cant decide between the 69'' or the 73'' for this engine... is there clearance for an 18'' prop..on the 69''

i think this engine might be a bit much for the 69'' and a little lacking for the 73'' a little help would be appricated

Brad

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 352

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 9/11/2008 6:16:01 PM   
octanehuffer



Posts: 769
Joined: 7/15/2006
From: Lakeland, MN, USA
Status: offline
It will be good on the 73". A saito 1.80 is fine for it.

_____________________________

QQ 120" Yak, QQ 86" Evolution, QQ 69" Saito 1.25, QQ 49" 32SX, QQ E-Yak, H9 T-Craft G-26, etc

(in reply to mobilemenice80)
       Post #: 353

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/15/2008 1:31:31 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1857
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Guys,

Here's a video of the electric 69".

www.rcmodelaviator.com/Videos/69E_V1.wmv

some parts of video, camera is not zoomed in enough to show the plane as good. Plane handles 9.5 lbs very well.

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to octanehuffer)
       Post #: 354

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/15/2008 2:42:55 AM   
mobilemenice80


 

Posts: 22
Joined: 5/13/2006
From: pinckney, MI, USA
Status: offline
reza


any input on the o.s. 2.00 four stroker in the 69" yak...i posted earlier but was kinda looking for your input

Brad

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 355

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/15/2008 5:47:38 AM   
rajul



Posts: 6478
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
Reza, any idea if there is an improved main landing gear without the toe-in camber? Thx

_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to mobilemenice80)
       Post #: 356

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/15/2008 3:12:20 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1857
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Brad, that engine is too big for that plane.

Mike, there won't be any improved main landing gear as far as I know.

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 357

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/15/2008 3:33:27 PM   
Jeff_edge540


 

Posts: 154
Joined: 9/24/2006
From: Austin, TX, USA
Status: offline
Does anyone have a source for an aftermarket gear for this plane? I'm about 80% finished with my build (going to be using a YS110) and the gear look terrible.

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 358

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/26/2008 1:44:54 AM   
Brenner


 

Posts: 90
Joined: 7/23/2007
From: Bridgman, MI, USA
Status: offline
Yeah, mine looks like a bow-legged sailor ....

(in reply to Jeff_edge540)
       Post #: 359

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/26/2008 5:53:32 AM   
rajul



Posts: 6478
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
IMO Quique should seriously look into the quality of the main landing gear. Nobody would want to spend an extra $50-60 on an aftermarket gear, considering the price of the Yak69". In my Yak102" I had to also make some modifications to the main landing gear due to the bad tilt in the plane caused by the gear.

_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to Brenner)
       Post #: 360

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/28/2008 5:33:08 AM   
Texas_Flyer


 

Posts: 98
Joined: 9/13/2005
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
Finally completed my Yak and maidened it today. :-) I'm using a Saito 125, 16x6 prop, Cool Power 30%, Futaba 2.4 Rx, and various digital servos. I don't have a final weight, but preliminary weighings were putting it about 8 lb - excellent for the size. While the 6 pitch prop doesn't fly very fast, it has lots of pull - takeoffs are in about 10'. The most amazing thing is that I couldn't get it to stall in slow flight. I cut power and gave it some elevator and it just seemed to float in the air - and there was no wind to hold it up! I yanked the elevator at different times and couldn't get that to stall either. In very little time, I gained a lot of confidence in this plane. I'm still slowly moving the CG back and am almost where I want it (roughly neutral). This has resulted in nearly zero coupling in KE. The only issues I had were that the canopy rattles in the front (some foam saddle tape should do the trick) and the covering really loosened in the sun (the heat gun should solve that). Overall, I've very pleased with the results, though the assembly took much more time than I anticipated. Thanks to all of you who posted in this thread to help those coming behind you.

Alan


Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 361

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/28/2008 6:51:11 AM   
rajul



Posts: 6478
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hi Alan, try the APC 16x4W prop. It's great for 3D type flying. I would also spray the inside of the canopy with silver paint (e.g. Tamiya mica silver) to prevent greenhouse heating effects. As you might be aware of, Futaba's 2.4 Rx could be temperature sensitive.

_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to Texas_Flyer)
       Post #: 362

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/30/2008 4:09:16 AM   
Texas_Flyer


 

Posts: 98
Joined: 9/13/2005
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
Mike,

Thanks for letting me know about the Futaba 2.4GHz RX heat issue - I had not heard about it!

I read another thread where Mike McConville from Hanger 9 also liked the 16x4W for 3D. The only reason I didn't try that was I thought it'd be too slow. With the reduced weight (significanly lighter than the 16x6 since it's flat/wide), what rpm should I expect to get? I'm wondering if the increase in rpms may partially offset the speed reduction from the lower pitch. I'm getting about 8700 max from my 16x6 with 30% fuel.

Thanks,

Alan

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 363

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/30/2008 12:06:49 PM   
rajul



Posts: 6478
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hi Alan, my Saito 125 on 15% coolpower and APC 16x4W (with TT spinner), I'm getting about 9700rpm peak but I richen it to 9400. I set my idle at 1800-2000 rpm. I also use a cline regulator with it. The valve lash is set to 0.002"

I also add a couple of ounces of Klotz Benol castor to every bottle of coolpower for the added protection.

< Message edited by rajul -- 9/30/2008 12:09:32 PM >


_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to Texas_Flyer)
       Post #: 364

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 9/30/2008 6:48:56 PM   
octanehuffer



Posts: 769
Joined: 7/15/2006
From: Lakeland, MN, USA
Status: offline
I use the 16x6 APC. I found that the 16x4W is under propped for a 1.25. Makes alot of noise and dosnt fly fast enough. I run 20-30%.

_____________________________

QQ 120" Yak, QQ 86" Evolution, QQ 69" Saito 1.25, QQ 49" 32SX, QQ E-Yak, H9 T-Craft G-26, etc

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 365

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 10/1/2008 12:52:58 AM   
Texas_Flyer


 

Posts: 98
Joined: 9/13/2005
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
Mike & Octanehuffer,

Thanks for the data. It's helpful to compare notes on props and performance.

Alan

(in reply to octanehuffer)
       Post #: 366

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 10/26/2008 5:31:48 PM