RE: 69" QQ Yak-54  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> Quique's Aircraft Support >> RE: 69" QQ Yak-54
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/15/2007 5:49:48 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Dear All,

I finally got to fly the New Somenized 69", Yak-54. I got totall of 4 flights. Flight 2 and 3 are taped for your viewing. Here's my short report on this:

Yak-54 69", Brio Scheme
OS 1.20 AX, APC 16x8
JR 8411s
Duralite 2 cell-2150 Li-Ion
Duralite Heavy Duty Switch and Regulator
AUW w/o SFG 8lbs 13oz

In my first and second flight, plane was a little nose heavy due to a very light battery and a fairly heavy spinner (4.5 oz). Plane would pull towards the canopy a little but show an amazing stability in rolls, hover, harriers, point rolls. Only draw back was nose would drop in flat spins and I needed to push a little harder in inverted flight.

3rd flight I took the spinner off and plane just felt like my 102". Almost perfect CG. I had to lightly push in inverted flight, almost just a touch. Everything felt very easy to do. SFGs did help in harrier and knife edge stability. Made the rolls a little slower which would help those who want to learn 3D flying to have more control over the plane. It was a little harder to start a torque roll with SFG on because of more drag but you could still torque roll the plane. Again another advantage for sports flyer to learn this maneuver and be able to observe the plane torque rolling. Sometimes plane torque rolls so fast and strong that sport flyers are not able to keep up with it. I could get the plane to do that without SFG but if you put the SFG on, you will see a slower torque roll.

Ailerons, Elevator and Rudder were as effective as a 50-100cc plane. Only difference was, plane felt LIGHTER and EASIER to fly.

Quique recommends 17x6 prop but unfortunately my LHS didn’t have one so I test flew the plane with APC 16x8. Prop was lacking static pull but was great for precision flying. I would also recommend 17x6 if you would like to do more 3D than precision.

The only thing I had problem with first 2 flights was the wheel pants After tightening the nut, that problem went away also.

If you are looking for a plane to start learning 3D and Precision, this should be the answer to your need!

We will have this video or another one later on www.QQAircraft.com. For now please watch video number 10 on www.RCModelAviator.com/Videos.html

Plane will be available Mid June!

Regards,
Reza Gholamipour
Quique's Aircraft Support


< Message edited by Rezagh -- 5/15/2007 5:55:37 PM >


_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 26

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/15/2007 5:53:26 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Some pics

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by Rezagh -- 5/15/2007 5:55:08 PM >


_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 27

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/15/2007 5:54:37 PM   
rajul



Posts: 6133
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
Rezagh, thanks

< Message edited by rajul -- 5/15/2007 5:57:26 PM >


_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 28

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/16/2007 1:06:12 PM   
JR3D


 

Posts: 54
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Boonville, IN, USA
Status: offline
I'm gonna use Hitec 5925's all around in this one, what are you guys gonna use?

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 29

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/18/2007 6:55:26 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Guys,

Here's the whole video with no editing from the maiden flight of the new Somenized Yak-54, 69". Please click on video number 10, www.RCModelAviator.com/Videos.html

Thank you,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to JR3D)
       Post #: 30

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/18/2007 10:57:28 PM   
JR3D


 

Posts: 54
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Boonville, IN, USA
Status: offline
Rezagh, did you have to put the battery in front of or behind the cg to get it to balence? I was thinking of cutting the motor box off and shortening the cowl to make it perform pitching manuevers better.

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 31

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/19/2007 6:47:30 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Why do you think, it needs any mods? or more nose pitching capability.

Plane flies outstanding! does not need any mod and we don't recommend any mods to be done on it either.

I will release the manual soon. You can see all the details next week.

Thank you,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to JR3D)
       Post #: 32

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/19/2007 7:05:44 AM   
rajul



Posts: 6133
Joined: 6/18/2002
From: Missouri City, TX, USA
Status: offline
Can you reposition the fuel tank to the cg?

_____________________________

Mike Marks
RCU Moderator
Aerofly Support Representative http://www.aerofly.com/index.html

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 33

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/19/2007 7:47:26 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
CG on this plane is so forward that is almost where the tank is. No need to relocate the tank. I didn't feel any flight difference when tank was empty to when tank was full.

Thank you,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to rajul)
       Post #: 34

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/20/2007 12:07:38 AM   
JR3D


 

Posts: 54
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Boonville, IN, USA
Status: offline
I wasn't saying that it needed any modding, it's a mod that alot of people perform on profile models to get the motor mass farther back, it makes them tumble better. I wasn't saying it needed to be modded I was just thinking of doing it, my apolagies.

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 35

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/21/2007 2:54:35 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
No worries JR3D. I flew it some more during the weekend and it really performs well. I think YS 1.10 would be an awesome engine for this plane as well. BTW, I flew it with 17x6 prop this time, less top speed more thrust for pull outs. As far tank and CG goes, you really don't feel any noticeable difference except for the flying weight of the plane when tank is full and when is almost empty and you want to land.

Thank you,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to JR3D)
       Post #: 36

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/22/2007 12:12:29 AM   
JR3D


 

Posts: 54
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Boonville, IN, USA
Status: offline
Do you think that you could put the tank over the cg anyway so that you can see the fuel level through the canopy? Flying profiles with the tank on the side spoils you like that :P

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 37

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/22/2007 12:31:15 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
I'm sure you can make mods if you want. Once you see the plane and how light it's built, you may stick with current set up. Everything is done for you and all you have to do is strap the tank.

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to JR3D)
       Post #: 38

RE: New Somenized (TM) 69", Yak-54 - 5/22/2007 9:16:00 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Gentlemen,

I have sent the assembly manual to Quique's Aircraft. It is 46 pages with 118 pictures. Video and manual will be posted on www.qqaircraft.com soon. Please check the website for more information when is available.

Regards,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to JR3D)
       Post #: 39

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 5/24/2007 6:47:25 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1710
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline
Assembly manual is posted on www.qqaircraft.com

Regards,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 40

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 6/10/2007 12:15:10 AM   
JR3D


 

Posts: 54
Joined: 4/15/2004
From: Boonville, IN, USA
Status: offline
any word on a release date or anything yet?

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 41

RE: 69" QQ Yak-54 - 6/15/2007 2:27:15 PM