blackshark3
Posts: 76
Score: 100 Joined: 3/15/2006 Last Login: 2/6/2008 From: Kowloon, HONG KONG Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: huckinstix Blackshark, can you elaborate on why you think this plane is more for electric than glow and how other planes (that are hybrid) are better suited with that "hybrid" tag? In regards to your comment about the wing assembly, I really like the wing assembly as opposed to my fliton extra freestyle where I have to screw it in sideways. Screwing it in from the top is a much easier option and I'm glad that was addressed. The covering works well for me, it is not coming loose and it is very friendly to work with. No wrinkles out of the box b.t.w. jfetter, the inspire 90 looks nothing like the inspire 60 in terms of design... so I have to strongly disagree with your "same plane but enlarged" theory. Given the scheme is similar, but thats about it. Look at the control surfaces alone for both planes, there is a huge difference. The Inspire 90 screams pattern while the 60 easily does both. 90 has a nice long tail moment. The fact that you throw that comment out there I think is hurting your credibility. Do people still believe that you can just blow an airplane up to a larger size? Its called Reynolds Number, read up on it sometime. The plane flies better than anything I have ever flown in this size, so everyone can have their opinions on little knick-knacks but truth be told, this thing flies unbelievably well. PS. Has it ever occured to any of you complainers to file a warranty claim with Fliton? Yes, they do offer warranty and darn good service at that too. I have never own any "hybrid" plane before, so I could not comment on the difference between the Inspire 90 and other hybrid planes..... My feeling that its designed from the ground up for electric is based on the facts that there are much fewer amenities for nitro engine fitting factored into the design of the plane, compared to electric. There is even no servo opening for placing the throttle servo, and no mention of how to place it in the manual! Yes nitro needs a servo, motor only need ESC, that's why Filton did not design for the throttle servo mounting hole. Also, that slot that goes under the cowling is designed for placing the ESC only, its too small for the short Hatori muffler, not to mention its impossible to use the older style long Hatori muffler. Further, for electric motor there is a very nice motor mount that comes with the kit, and the firewall already have slots opened to take that motor mount, which makes out a very clean and neat installation, but for nitro they only give a crappy engine mount without dampers, and I have to patch up all the slots opened for the electric motor mount on the firewall and improvise on mounting the engine. All these give the impression that Filton design the plane for electric, then throw in a crappy engine mount and a fuel tank to call it a hybrid.... As to the securing of the wings, yes I would say that having the screws facing on top is very convenient, but that lip, while ok for electirc, needs more "meat" to take the vibration of a 4 stroke nitro engine. Also, my friends' Inspire 90 comes with carbon wing tube, mine was black aluminum, maybe I had a lemon.... Overall, I like very much the cosmetic of the plane (Except for the elevator dowel...), and the construction is not bad, if I plan to fly electric with it I think I would like the Inspire 90 very much, but as a nitro guy I feel that while they named it according the size of a nitro engine, the Inspire simply does not provide enough design consideration for mounting a nitro engine. Further at this price I would expect better ingredient. Mine might fly very well with a nitro engine afterall, but just by looking at it in kit form now I am not impressed yet... My 0.0002cent....
< Message edited by blackshark3 -- 7/11/2007 10:33 AM >
_____________________________
Technical consultant Hirobo Limited; Black Products; Cosmo Fuel
Hide Signatures
|