karma99
Posts: 327
Joined: 12/18/2006 From: Portsmouth, UNITED KINGDOM Status: offline
|
It's an interesting discussion (when we can keep it pleasant!) My opinion, is that Tamiya's are obviously better, but for me I don't think they're worth the price they charge compared to the HL/WSN/Mattoro's. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if Tamiya's prices stay as they are then I'll probably never buy one. I'd rather have 2-3 tanks of other brands with full metal upgrades, maybe scratch build parts for some different variants when I want a stronger modelling side to the hobby. I just can't justify the price of a Tamiya as they stand at the moment.. no matter how awesome Sturn's KT is looking! I'm like a brooding mother with my HL Tiger as it is because I spent so many hours "correcting" it and I wouldn't consider it "cheap". Can you imagine what I'd be like with a Tam, for the hours to make it AND the cost?!! I'd have to hire armed guards for it, and modifying it would never even enter my mind.. what if it went wrong?!! To me at the current cost, I don't want one for the same reason I don't want a Ferrari.. I'd spend far more time worrying about it getting wrecked than I would actually enjoying it!
_____________________________
1/8 Mark-1 Jagdpanther : 1/16 HE M1 : 1/16 HL Tiger (Early) : 1/16 HL Panzer III N: 1/16 HL Panther - the next project!
|