ksoc
Posts: 649
Joined: 6/27/2006 From: Dana Point,
CA, USA Status: online
|
quote:
The new Panzer III is supposed ot be the best yet, and it is still cheap. What about the story tha Mato had to send a prototype back to HL with a request for numerous changes. Doesn't seem as if HL gets it yet. They settle for the "good enough" philosophy. That works great who love tinkering and fixing, especially you British types. I think it is in your DNA. How else can you explain MG & Austin/Healey, etc..... ??? HL has shown an aversion to making complex tanks. They have stuck with the simple swing arm suspsension and avoided the Sherman's HVSS. Wouldn't most of you HL Tiger drivers like a Sherman to square off against? They would strike gold if they made a good VVSS that could be grafted onto Tamiya Shermans, and a cast upper hull. HL AND Tamiya owner would buy just to get thoses. The VVSS was a hell of a lot more common then athe HVSS. What is needed is an RTR RC grade tank, not a toy. The drives and electroncis would be reasonably sealed up. Easy to work on and replace part - like a RC Car. Through in the proportional radio, 2000 mAh battery/charger, and most importanly the Battle System. No paint (colored plastic), tools not attached. You can run it right out of the box you could run up to 6 at a time, or paint and upgrade to your hearts content. (2.4 GHz radio, quick charger,bigger battery, exterior details, metal tracks......) Offer turnkey upgrades at a higher price as Mato does. What would you pay for the basic package? Remember , a HL Tiger S&S from Mato, with metal suspension arms and idlers cost $130, so you are talking about a re-engineered tank, proportional radio, PLUS a Battle System. Let the bidding begin..... KevinO <S.C.A.T.>
_____________________________
Kevin O''C <S.C.A.T> www.socalareatankers.com • Tamiya-Sherman/Tiger/Pershing/Kubelwagen • HL-Tiger, Panzer III
|