ptxman
Posts: 351
Joined: 7/31/2002 From: Calgary, AB, CANADA Status: offline
|
quote:
.... I am open to suggestions on an airfoil for the wing right now im pretty stuck on the clark y due the fact that this is my first project of this nature. I have a question about the wing and how I should go about designing it, rib spacing, spars and the uniqe sweeping of the leading and trailing edges. Thats a really cool project, nice cad work too. Certain aspects of the wing construction would be challenging for a first-timer, but you should know its not outside the scope of what modelers are doing in other diciplines. Everybody starst somewhere & if you genuinely like your project, you will learn whats required to build it & ultimately succeed! Re wing construction, I think the closest comparable work is being done by the DLG (Discus Launch Glider) crowd. Their wings have airfoils with comparable or thinner max thickness (5-8% MT foils I believe), somewhat similar high aspect planforms, sometimes multi paneled like your project & actually pretty high loads. A popular method they have perfected is hot wire cutting foam cores (either manually or through CNC services who do this), install appropriate spars/reinforcement & vac bag kevlar or similar cloth skin. So many of the issues pertaining to strength, materials, control surface actuating & hinging, dimensional accuracy, surface finish, even painting have been dealt with. You can do a net search on 'DLG' & I think they still have a forum on yahoo groups. Or just hop over to this group & you will have a few nights of useful surfing: http://www.rcgroups.com/hand-launch-96/ particularly if you do a search on keywords like 'bagging' or 'supergee' there are some good build threads with lots of pics & details, ex: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=246671 http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=99866 http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=179297 The old school ribs/spars/sheeting method might be getting taxed pretty severely on this dimensional planform. There just isnt a lot of material to work with & the net result strength weight will probably not be as good as the DLG method. Having said that, your cad files are a direct plug-in to laser cutting services which would be cost effective & remove a lot of scrollsaw grunt work. Laser parts would be dimensionally very acurate (kerfs in the low-thou range) & you can be creative about how parts notch & index together to yield a strong yet light structure. But because its not a WW1 rib & cloth model, its basic manual sheeting & glassing & finishing thereafter... The next option is cadillac, but if you have access to someone with a cnc router/mill, your (presuming 3d surface files) are perfect to develop plugs & molds. Thats a whole ($$) world unto itself, but something to be aware of. Maybe you want to build som espares while you're at it or share some kits with friends? Re airfoil, there probably isnt much wrong with Clark Y for the primary task intended: lifting a fuse load on a popsicle stick wing surface & flying around upright & moderatley (c/w weight adding gangly landing gear gear & maybe some RC spy telemtry hardware) . There are probably better airfoils out there that might assist you though: - something that would give comparable or better lift/drag polars, but possibly be even thicker max%. Your main challenge will be bending stresses so the thicker the spar depth, the stronger the structure... until 'too thick' interfers with aerodynamics. - a foil that may be suited to flap employment. This gives you the best of both worlds, ability to safely takeoff if weight becomes an issue & retract them back when flying around. There are more qualified people than me to help with this, but be aware there are programs like Profili which are useful to simulate (2d) airfoil performance, have hundreds of available airfoils in their database & the ability to tweak/modify/export coodinates to your cad program. http://www.profili2.com/eng/default.htm Good luck!
|