NikolayTT
Posts: 572
Joined: 9/29/2002 From: Tampere, FINLAND Status: offline
|
One should check with the local authorities. For 2.4 GHz in Europe is either 250 mW and might be even down to 50 mW which makes Spektrum well out of the law. I asked them but no answer came. In UK that is higher and in USA could be even higher up to 1500 mW. Still based on practical experiments and also what is used in life-saving systems, as in millitary, the power in those frequencies is up to 10 Watts, and boosting it up might cause coverage distruction; that is due to multiple reflections, which cause subsequent field phase modulations in a random manner. Simply, if you want to see it, then just drop two stones at ones with one hand in calm wather and the pattern of the surface is going to be quite similar to what I am mentioning. And as you guess it already - in the Air - those NASTY(!) things are even 3-dimensional and Invisible, that is why more receivers and antenas are better. The biggest problem is that no one of the current manufacturers adressed (or wanted to address) this classic problem described since couple centuries ago by the early works of Maxwel, Faraday etc. and instead ot that they tell us how to programm the features and mixers, which is too simple compared to that nasty radio-wave propagation. Sure there are many success stories in 2.4GHz but we need to know about the artifacts more anyway. The future is the for sure the Digital Communication approaches 2.4GHz but let see when that technology will get out of its baby-stage of ANTENA development for RC. Of course some people prefer to be excited than to look into the problems, but everybody is free to spend his money as he wants, isn't it. If you want to know more about, check so called MIMO-Antenas for the Mobile Wireless Communications, WLANS and WCDMA phones; there the developments are about maybe 5 years ahead of that we see at Spektrum, no jokes, this is very serious multi-billon-dollar business indeed. Cheers, Nick
|