outacontrol41
Posts: 1167
Joined: 11/27/2004 From: Girdletree,
MD, USA Status: offline
|
My true scale kits or scratch builds hang from the shop ceiling and are mostly admired...and they do fly for airshows, club funflys and do mall show displays. Much time and money are spent on these. My ARF's, on the other hand, are flown continuously during the flying season and I wouldn't become suicidal if one went down as compared to a stick build. Consider: Baron, you're comparing an expensive full build kit to an assembly line ARF...with vaccum-formed canopy! no less. If you read this entire thread...you'll discover that all of us who have been actively participating in this discussion know what we're getting and no one's bubble will be burst. We never said, after the second version came out, "that's 100% perfect to scale"....building an ARF of this type of plane would be nearly impossible. BUT, I'll have to say that to RC Guy's credit, they listened, reacted, tried to improve, and as a result we have a much more acurate version of the real thing.--And I'll settle for that. Question for Baron: Go to www.rcguys.com and check out their complete lineup including the Cessna 150. Are those more acurate scale renditions, in your opinion, of the real thing? If so, do you think that RC Guys should have spent yet more time designing and producing the Agwagon to be more scale? I know ARFs are hard to produce to look 100% scale and I am a critical guy, but there's a line that I won't cross if the model is built well, flys well, and is recognizable as it's intended target. I think (my opinion as a consumer) that RC Guys have got it right this time. I guess it boils down to who they hired as the designer for this model....would you hire him on your staff?? LOL. Could've been designed by Dan himself.
|