RE: H9 Sundowner  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> ARF or RTF >> RE: H9 Sundowner
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/21/2007 1:48:41 AM   
Cyclic_ Hardover



Posts: 75
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: 5200'agl, NM, USA
Status: offline
Unless I am reading this wrong, this plane "must" have the Evo 35gt and nothing else? No other 35cc except this? If this is so, they can keep it. This has all the slick doings of a monopolized setup between Evolution, H9 and the Officials to force buyers of this plane only to use the Evo 35gt.

After reading this, it killed my deal on this plane.

< Message edited by Cyclic_ Hardover -- 6/21/2007 1:55:04 AM >


_____________________________

Retired Army Aviator, F-20/Jett50, UltraSport/Jett 90,WM GS P-51, Modeltech P-47, WM Midget, Dago Red 60, Shoestring, Shrik

(in reply to GR7Racer)
       Post #: 51

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/21/2007 4:54:16 PM   
GR7Racer


 

Posts: 84
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: , CA, USA
Status: offline
The thought process behind only allowing the Evolution 35GT is to make an even playing field for everybody. That's why it's one airplane, one engine, and race supplied prop and fuel. No grand conspiracy here. There are other USRA classes with similar parameters. The Formula 1 GT class and the AT-6 class allow only one engine in stock form. Like it or not, it makes the racing very close and makes it a little easier for a new racer to be competitive right off the bat.

KMac

(in reply to Cyclic_ Hardover)
       Post #: 52

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/21/2007 6:33:18 PM   
P-51B



Posts: 6173
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Status: offline
How about the MVVS 35, same engine different supplier?

Also, the rules say "spec aircraft". It will be tough to race them when they all look alike.

< Message edited by P-51B -- 6/21/2007 7:23:58 PM >


_____________________________

In order to think "outside the box", one must first accept there IS a box.

(in reply to GR7Racer)
       Post #: 53

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/21/2007 8:09:40 PM   
GR7Racer


 

Posts: 84
Joined: 2/6/2006
From: , CA, USA
Status: offline
We are going to stick with the Evolution 35 for now...it's set up for ignition and gas making it easy to operate. The little gas carb has a pump that will also make fuel delivery a non issue and tank placement less critical. Plus we will be supplying the fuel for the racers at the event and we only need to have one type of fuel. We also have a tech process that insures that the engines are stock and that could get complicated with different manufacturers, even when it's the same engine.

As for identification, we will most likely be using a system similar to the Q500 and Q40 folks with one of 2 different brightly colored stickers either on the right wing or left wing. Let's say we use pink and green fluorescent stickers. We would divide the racers into five groups. Group one would put the pink sticker on the top and bottom of the right wing panel (high wing in a turn). Group two would put the pink sticker on the left panel. Groups three and four would repeat that with the green sticker. The fifth group would have no sticker. The next day, we would reassign everybody into five new groups and hand out stickers again so you can race some of the people who were in your original group. Not a perfect system, but workable...

KennyMac


(in reply to P-51B)
       Post #: 54

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/21/2007 11:01:23 PM   
jfetter


 

Posts: 321
Joined: 11/25/2003
From: MIRAMAR, FL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: reincarnate

The speculation is over. I picked mine up tonight at LHS, evidently right off the UPS truck, since it wasn't even in the computer yet.



I got one! I called my LHS today after finding out the one I have on order was not coming in until Monday instead of yesterday afternoon, and they had one in stock. I have to say, awesome fit and finish! The interior has plenty of room for my flight batteries (2 x EVO 6S2P 5000's, though the wing tube will require I insert them into the rear portion of the fuse and then slide forward and under the tube). So far I only unpacked and inspected everything, going to re-shrink a few trouble spots (nothing more than a minor stretch) this evening...

Jack

(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 55

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 1:11:47 AM   
reincarnate



Posts: 782
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline
Hey jfetter... Can you give me an idea of what it's going to cost to run a plane this size with electric? Motor, ESC, Batteries? I'm going gas or glow (jury' still out), but I've always wondered what a big electric would cost to set up. Also what kind of flight times do you get with your set up? Just curious for the future.

(in reply to jfetter)
       Post #: 56

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 1:36:52 AM   
Mikel-t


 

Posts: 337
Joined: 12/9/2002
From: Ellicott City, MD, USA
Status: offline
Hey Jack , can you take a minute and let us ( me) know what the dimension are from firewall to backplate and how wide is the cowl at the firewall?. I have a G-26 fresh from Ralph's ignitions and hope this is a match?> Thanks much. Mikel-t


_____________________________

Mike L
''The future?...well it ain''t what it used to be!"

(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 57

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 2:37:07 AM   
jfetter


 

Posts: 321
Joined: 11/25/2003
From: MIRAMAR, FL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mikel-t

Hey Jack , can you take a minute and let us ( me) know what the dimension are from firewall to backplate and how wide is the cowl at the firewall?. I have a G-26 fresh from Ralph's ignitions and hope this is a match?> Thanks much. Mikel-t



Mikel-t

The manual calls for 5 7/8" from the firewall to the drive washer, there is no room for anything else because unlike other planes with cowls that can be pulled slightly more or less over the fuse to accomodate, this one is already drilled because it fits tight against the airframe, there is one mounting position. The cowl is cavernous inside, i've included a few pics showing the size of the cowl (huge!), let me know if this isn't sufficient for you to determine fit...

Jack

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to Mikel-t)
       Post #: 58

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 2:41:07 AM   
jasonred007


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 4/29/2006
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Status: offline
Got mine today!!!!!!!!! now for the hard part POWER!!!! does anyone know about the fuji imvac motors??? I dont really want the evolutions on my plane and zenoahs seem to be heavy!!!! any body have any ideas????

(in reply to Mikel-t)
       Post #: 59

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 3:17:53 AM   
jfetter


 

Posts: 321
Joined: 11/25/2003
From: MIRAMAR, FL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: reincarnate

Hey jfetter... Can you give me an idea of what it's going to cost to run a plane this size with electric? Motor, ESC, Batteries? I'm going gas or glow (jury' still out), but I've always wondered what a big electric would cost to set up. Also what kind of flight times do you get with your set up? Just curious for the future.



OK, my answer is by no means gospel, I have my own system and I beleive in only A-grade components plus I am a monster with batteries. People at the field clutch their heart when I open my field battery case with 10 FlightPower EVO 6S2P 5000 MAh packs ($395 a pop) because they just see the initial expense. When I started out, I would fly 2 packs and field charge them in between flights, it can be done but there is some down time. Every battery pack should take an hour to charge (LiPo's) because you always charge them at 1C, or 1 times the capacity. So for my 5000 MAh packs, I charge them at 5 amps (really 5000 MAh, their exact capacity in an hour). People have a hard time with this (I don't know why, it's quite simple) but if you always remember that, you'll see that flying for 15 minutes and then dropping in pack 2 and flying for another 15 minutes means you'll land and pack 1 will still have 45 minutes to charge.

Now the logical thought would be to add 2 more LiPo packs, even if the nearly $800 doesn't bother you, you can calculate that flying all 4 packs for 15 minutes, you would land and pack 1 would still have 15 minutes to charge. Also, you now have more than 1 pack charging at a time, so you have to bump up the number of chargers you have (not too bad, the AstroFlight 109 is still one of the best chargers and only $129). But that comes at a cost as well because charging 2 x 5000 packs at 1C requires a 12-volt draw of nearly 11.5 amps, too much for your small lead acid starter batteries (I had 3 in parallel and I'd drain them before 2 packs were charged, not actually drained but too low to keep the sustained 13.8 volts the chargers need to not error out). This means a heafty car or marine battery or a 12-volt source like a 20 amp DC converter.

If you add in allowing the packs to cool to ambient temperature before charging (always best practice), you quickly come to the conclusion that flying a lot with electric really boils down to how many batteries you bring with you. You can charge at the field sure but if you really, really like to fly and stay in the air as much as possible, it's hard to have a charging system that can keep up with less than 3 chargers running simultaniously and 6 flight packs. This system works, I did it for a long time but finally I decided that I would just buy more packs. The difference was that I would try and buy packs that would be ideal in most planes by themselves or the right size to run in series with the larger 2-meter planes I knew I would end up with. I chose 6S but 5S would have been a great choice as well. Most .60 - .90 sized planes require a 5S to fly well but really a 6S to have a kick. Likewise most 2 meter or larger warbirds require 8S to 10S, so if I use 2 of my 6S packs in series for a 12S pack, I get kick to spare (though this comes at a cost because I have to oversize my motor and speed controller so they don't fry, which really translates to more money).

OK, what's it all mean? It's just different than glo/gas, no harder, just new things to learn. Once you get in to electric it all starts to make sense, you'll go from smaller foamies, perhaps indoor helis to .40/.60 planes, perhaps even more to the larger stuff, I guess it depends on your ability to rationalize spending money up front for batteries that are really comparable to buying your glo fuel a few years in advance. I crash and destroy 2 of my 6S 5000 packs and I am out the plane, electronics plus $800 in "fuel". I wont get the chance to get my moneys worth from those 2 packs, that can be hard to accept for some. Truth is if the LiPo gets 300 charge cycles (about what the manufacturers say it should), I will be flying for a fuel cost of $1.25 per flight (1 pack) or $2.50 (when I use 2 in series), not really out of line with glo though more than gas. But if you factor in my plane balances the same before and after the flight, my motor needs no tuning, it runs the same hot, cold, humid, dry and there is no cleanup, you might find that preferable as I do.

Here's the cost of my e-flight components for my Fliton Inspire 60 for an example of startup cost;
Axi 4130/16 outrunner motor - $189
Jeti 75 amp Spin ESC - $199
FlightPower EVO 5000 MAh LiPo - $375 (I get 12 minutes of "strong" flying)

This combination equates to about 145 watts/lb. a retio that says unlimited vertical and the ability to easily hover (150watts/lb is the goal if that is your desired flying style). You don't need a glo engine or a throttle servo so the cost of the electric motor is a wash, if you buy 2 batteries, then the difference is $950 over glo (ESC (speed controller) plus 2 battery packs). This $1,000 does not cover LiPo chargers, 12-volt converters for field charging, WhattMeter and Spin controllers for tuning, etc. Bottom line is you will need to spend more than $1,500 if you have no components over the cost of the regular glo version. If you are talking about the Sundowner which will use 2 of these LiPo packs in series and require a 100 amp speed controller and larger motor, the numbers are even higher. For me it's not an issue because I have been flying larger electrics for close to 4 years, I have a substantial invenstment in LiPo's so that is not a charge I see (I do recognise the investment though and the time to keep them all balanced and charged properly). I guess in the end it comes down to what you like, it's a hobby after all, it's supposed to make you happy while you have fun...

(sorry for the essay!)

Jack


(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 60

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 1:51:36 PM   
reincarnate



Posts: 782
Joined: 10/1/2006
From: Columbia City, IN, USA
Status: offline
Wow. Thats all. Wow. I'd have to start over. You sound like you have it all down though. Thanks for the information. I think I'll stick with the fuel power for now, but you gave enough information to get someone started spending money. Good report.

(in reply to jfetter)
       Post #: 61

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 9:29:03 PM   
McCoy


 

Posts: 39
Joined: 4/26/2002
From: parlin, NJ, USA
Status: offline
HI fellows I really don't understand what all the fuss is about with what powerplant to install in this plane.There is only two engines that should go in this plane. That is the MOKEI 1.80 & 2.10 period ! If you want to race with speed and excitement these are the true powerplants. Afteral these motors are already being used in the Dominator class. The Mokei 2.10 with a 17x14 apc prop will be unstopable. That why I can't understand why the racing rules where limited to the 35cc gas. The Mokei will run circles around this engine.
Now considering electric to have real speed and be competitive you will problely need $1500-1800 in esc, batteries,and motor.
The average person with this plane will never spend $1500-$1800 on fuel.
Now that I think about it the people that distribute the kit is the same ones that distribute the engine. Maybe they have a in the rules committee. I think it should be open up to any 30-35cc engine gas,glow. 2stroke,4stroke. electric. Thanks just my two cents.

(in reply to reincarnate)
       Post #: 62

RE: H9 Sundowner - 6/22/2007 9:48:57 PM   
Cyclic_ Hardover



Posts: 75
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: 5200'agl, NM, USA
Status: offline