RE: Fliton Element 170    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Pattern Universe - RC Pattern Flying >> RC Pattern Flying >> RE: Fliton Element 170
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>  

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/11/2008 2:37 PM   
Jeff Boyd 2



Posts: 730
Score: 100
Joined: 3/18/2005
Last Login: 9/13/2012
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
Tianci . . I built a 2M ARF Pattern plane with CA hinges and flew it for 12 Months. I sold it at the end of the season, and the new owner has just competed with it for another 12 Months . . and they are holding up fine.

I didn't use the CA hinges that came with the plane (ESM/Kondor Arresti III - no longer available and a GREAT flying plane I must add). I felt they were a bit flimsy . . I opted to use Radio South CA Hinges, and they are great http://www.radiosouthrc.com/pro-hinge.htm

The hinge bevels need to fit up tight with little or no gap, otherwise there can be some movement in the joint . . not good when using high quality digitals to get accurate, precise control only to have the surfaces moving around

Cheers, JB

PS. You can also get them from Central Hobbies . . http://www.centralhobbies.com/building_materials/hinges.htm


< Message edited by Jeff Boyd 2 -- 11/11/2008 2:47 PM >


_____________________________

South Australian Pattern Association web = http://sapa-f3a.blogspot.com/

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 201

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/11/2008 6:00 PM   
patternflyer1



Posts: 1986
Score: 100
Joined: 7/3/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Tracy, CA, USA
Status: offline
The rear tube will seem loose until the stab is on. It is the adjustable tube. DON'T REMOVE YOUR COVERING... lol
I used the stock CA hinges as shown earlier somewhere. I love CA hinges. Radio South CA hinges are the best though.

Chris

_____________________________

Team BJ Craft Team F3A Unlimited
Team Airtronics

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 202

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/11/2008 9:33 PM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Okay ... CA hinges are fine. Now about the adjustable stab, how do I keep it in place once its 'adjusted'.What do I adjust for? Best to keep it at ZERO right?

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to patternflyer1)
       Post #: 203

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/12/2008 2:17 AM   
patternflyer1



Posts: 1986
Score: 100
Joined: 7/3/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Tracy, CA, USA
Status: offline
Keep it at zero to start yes. It will stay in place by itself. The adjuster screw is from the bottom by the tailwheel. I'm sure you saw it already.

Chris

_____________________________

Team BJ Craft Team F3A Unlimited
Team Airtronics

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 204

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/12/2008 9:33 AM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Pattern ... did not do a close examination yet, will look at it later this week. Thanks man ... lucky I left the CA in my car ... if not ... oh boy!

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to patternflyer1)
       Post #: 205

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/18/2008 11:15 PM   
vsilva


 

Posts: 20
Score: 100
Joined: 9/21/2006
Last Login: 8/31/2012
From: Barcelos, PORTUGAL
Status: offline
Hi

I have received my element 170, and i was sad because it is much heavier than they say.

1. Main wing : 1070 grams (37.74 oz)

2. Fuselage : 1185 grams (41.80 oz)

3. Stabilizer : left and right side 113 -113 grams (3.99 oz) each
...
=== Total Around Weight : 2,828 grams (99.75 oz) ================


Hide Signatures

(in reply to woo)
       Post #: 206

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 12:13 AM   
Jeff Boyd 2



Posts: 730
Score: 100
Joined: 3/18/2005
Last Login: 9/13/2012
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
WOW . . that IS heavy. What power system are you running? I will be VERY interested what your finished weight will be.

JB

_____________________________

South Australian Pattern Association web = http://sapa-f3a.blogspot.com/

Hide Signatures

(in reply to vsilva)
       Post #: 207

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 12:57 AM   
vsilva


 

Posts: 20
Score: 100
Joined: 9/21/2006
Last Login: 8/31/2012
From: Barcelos, PORTUGAL
Status: offline

This is a empty weight, around 470grams more than announce.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jeff Boyd 2)
       Post #: 208

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 1:50 AM   
BHolsten


 

Posts: 876
Score: 100
Joined: 3/28/2007
Last Login: 5/23/2013
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Status: offline
Holly cow,.....sure your scale is right? That only gives you about 2161.51 grams or 4.765.32 pounds to play with max,...thats mission impossible in my opinion.

I "had" an Icepoint which is similar in construction and my Icepoint came out 10.4 pounds ready to fly with a OS-140RX and two mini servos in each stab and a 1900mah Duralite battery. I myself would try a different scale just to be sure, because my digital poastal scale was only good to a quarter of a pound + or - and I didn't know that at first,...it's just a thought. I am using a cooking type scale now that goes to 11pounds and its accurate to with in an ounce.

Anyone else have this problem with their Element 170's?

Best Regards,
Bill Holsten
Fliton Team Pilot
www.flitoncompetition.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to vsilva)
       Post #: 209

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 8:53 AM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Let me weigh mine this weekend and see ... hmmmm ... interesting ...

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to BHolsten)
       Post #: 210

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 9:34 AM   
patternflyer1



Posts: 1986
Score: 100
Joined: 7/3/2003
Last Login: 5/20/2013
From: Tracy, CA, USA
Status: offline
I will post my weights on the scale as it was new in my build thread for those interested. Mine was outta the first batch though. Maybe someone will post their pics from the second batch..

Chris

_____________________________

Team BJ Craft Team F3A Unlimited
Team Airtronics

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 211

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/19/2008 3:13 PM   
BHolsten


 

Posts: 876
Score: 100
Joined: 3/28/2007
Last Login: 5/23/2013
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Status: offline
That sounds good guys! I hope there is a good response, so we may develope a weight average perhaps of the first and second batch combined.

Plus: I will add,...it was indicated to me that each part/piece is weighed with each respective kit number and if it is substandard it gets recycled,.including weight.

PS: Composite should be here in a week or two,...I hope. I will be pushed for the Tangerine and will start a thread after.

Best Regards,
Bill Holsten
Team Fliton
www.flitoncompetition.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to patternflyer1)
       Post #: 212

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/21/2008 4:26 PM   
vsilva


 

Posts: 20
Score: 100
Joined: 9/21/2006
Last Login: 8/31/2012
From: Barcelos, PORTUGAL
Status: offline
The plane assembled with the electronic ... leaving missing a power system (speed controller, engine, propeller)
Around Weight : 3275 grams (116 oz)
According to my calculations, in-flight will be in the 5385 grams (200 oz).

< Message edited by vsilva -- 11/24/2008 7:45 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to BHolsten)
       Post #: 213

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 11/21/2008 8:47 PM   
BHolsten


 

Posts: 876
Score: 100
Joined: 3/28/2007
Last Login: 5/23/2013
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Status: offline
Huuummmmmmm,...........if that's the case, I will pass it along to the powers to be. In the mean time you may want to contact patternflyer1 as he is flying one on electric. Perhaps he may be able to help you in some areas of the airframe to cut some weight (rail mounts, etc).

There is a very nice thread on the pattern electric page with patternflyer1 posting his weights as indicated on his scale. I wish I could help you,..but I don't even have mine yet,.so patternflyer1 is perhaps your best source.

vsilva,....keep us posted on the finial outcome with the weight,......as those are the second run of planes, it's something that needs to have a watchful eye on.


Best Regards,
Bill Holsten
Team Fliton
www.flitoncompetition.com

Hide Signatures

(in reply to vsilva)
       Post #: 214

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 3/27/2009 2:24 PM   
hezik


 

Posts: 613
Score: 109
Joined: 8/27/2006
Last Login: 10/28/2012
From: VleutenUtrecht, NETHERLANDS
Status: offline
Yep, the wood version is way to heavy, and way heavier than advertised. A friend of mine got one and AUW is 5.4kg, for an electric version.

For instance: the wing with servo's installed (Futaba S9150): 1.2kg.. so that's at least 300 grams overweight.

Rumours has it the first batch was more heavy than the newer versions.. dunno if it's true.

Still.. for beginner and novice the weight shoulnd't have to pose that big of a problem (in the dutch windy conditions it's even a plus for a beginner) and she does look fine, especially if you take the price into the consideration.

If one really wants, it's possible to reach the 5kg mark on an electric version.

Things that can be improved:
- ALL steering survaces (ailerons/elevetors/rudder) are made from solid wood. Replace that by ribbed construction, for at least the rudder and elevators
- The wing is too heavy, would probably be best to just build a new foam-balsa-sheeted wing
- replacing the gear with a lighter one (though the supplied one isn't that heavy) (my friend used a Bolly carbone landing gear)
- replacing the canopy with a carbone version
- taking out the cockpit floor and backside

After having done this, you should be able to come in below 5kg AUW.



< Message edited by hezik -- 3/27/2009 2:37 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jeff Boyd 2)
       Post #: 215

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 3/27/2009 6:39 PM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Actually, there was some mistake in the manufacturing for the first batch and that caused it to weigh more than as advertised. Fliton has found out why and its been sorted out as they say. I believe not all were over weight but some actually were. Mine was over weight, some got planes that were as advertised. It happens. Fliton was nice enough to resolve mine for me. They were fast to act upon it. That is good ...

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to hezik)
       Post #: 216

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 3/31/2009 2:07 PM   
vsilva


 

Posts: 20
Score: 100
Joined: 9/21/2006
Last Login: 8/31/2012
From: Barcelos, PORTUGAL
Status: offline
Hi to all,

After several contacts with Fliton, since November last year as you know, and with my problem of weight unsolved, I realize that Fliton is not the best choice when you want to compete with the best, so I will do the same that other pilots already have done - given up on Fliton.
As advice do not try com compete with Fliton models, someday you will need their help and no one will be on the other side of the line.
I'm not asking for sponsorship but support to solve conception problems that prevent me to compete at a higher level.
I've canceled my participation on this year F3A Championship, because of excess of weight in ELEMENT 170. This year the World Championship is here in Portugal, and so Fliton could have free advertising during all the event, but Fliton is not good enough to even think of that.
So if you want to be a professional or try to be one, get real and forget Fliton - try to find a full cycle team and not just a supplier.


Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 217

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/8/2009 1:28 PM   
hezik


 

Posts: 613
Score: 109
Joined: 8/27/2006
Last Login: 10/28/2012
From: VleutenUtrecht, NETHERLANDS
Status: offline
Same advice here. My friend has tried to contact fliton to get a light version, but didnt even get a reply.

So if you go ahead and buy a fliton Element 170 F3A, there's a chance you'll get a plane roughly 500 grams heavier than advertised and no way to change it for a lighter version.

Nice if you're not serieously interested in competing and/or need a not-to-expesive training version, but if you do want to fly contests, don't by a fliton, basically that's the conclusion I have to derive from this.

I had the plane over to check a few things and really.. the wing with servo's weighs down to 1350 grams. On the wing alone, that's at least 300 grams to much to be a serieous plane. I didn't have the chance to weigh the thing myself, now I did, so the weights in this posting are accurate.

Also I noticed that the construction for the stab is flawed. I know the aft tube is supposed to sit 'loose' (since it's adjustable) and the front one is fixed in the fuse. This is indeed the case with my friends aircraft, only the front one is simply to large, giving the carbon tube quite some room to move. When properly attachted, one can move the stab like 15 degrees up an down.

Since he doesnt have budget to go out and buy another (besides the question wether the new one WIL be on par with it's weight), he now has to fly with a 5.6kg 2m F3A pattern ship, which basically is nice for a high-wind trainer, but useless in all other area's.

I'm also in the market for a 2m pattern ship, but wont buy the filton. Instead I have decided to buy the slightly smaller Sebart Wind 110s. It's about the same price, and not that much smaller to make it useless.. (1m80 fuselage lengt). Other alternatives that are full size are the 'E-Evolution' (which is even cheaper than the fliton, light, comes with bags to transport it in, but is, in my opinion, buttugly), the 'world models spot-on', same pricerange, and so on. I'm sticking to the Sebart since I know I'll get a quality product which lives up to the advertised specs.

I have to note that the plane I'm talking about is an electric version (10S/ Axi). If he had built it with a fuel engine, say the OS 160FX, he might just have been able to get it down to 5kg, but it would still be either really close or overweight.

Also 'Extremeflight' will release their 2m 'Vanquish' which will probably be in the same pricerange. In short: anything you can afford is better than taking the risk of getting a 500 gram overweight fliton..

It's not even the fact that they are too heavy, but the fact that they are advertised to be lighter and fliton doesn't exchange heavy versions that makes me say don't buy it. The fact that they didn't even answer the email about the weight issue says it all.

It's really a shame, because in all other respects it's a nice plane at a really nice price.. sigh..

quote:

ORIGINAL: tIANci

Actually, there was some mistake in the manufacturing for the first batch and that caused it to weigh more than as advertised. Fliton has found out why and its been sorted out as they say. I believe not all were over weight but some actually were. Mine was over weight, some got planes that were as advertised. It happens. Fliton was nice enough to resolve mine for me. They were fast to act upon it. That is good ...


Could you PM me the email address you used to contact them?

< Message edited by hezik -- 4/8/2009 1:42 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to vsilva)
       Post #: 218

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/8/2009 3:19 PM   
BHolsten


 

Posts: 876
Score: 100
Joined: 3/28/2007
Last Login: 5/23/2013
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Status: offline
That is not completely true!

vsilva contacted me many times via my email and through RC-U and I forwarded the emails and even had several conversations about the emails to specific factory people. As a Fliton Rep & Team pilot vsilva did get help from me as much as I could do for him.

So,.. to say no one from Fliton did not respond is not completely accurate,...perhaps not the right people responded. Let's not smack all the fliton people in the face by saying "no one responded" it's an unfair statement.


vsilva,...many apologies it not getting your problem taken care of. I will speak with a fliton dealer to see if you can get any help.



Regards,
Bill Holsten

Advantage Hobby & Fliton Field Rep/Duralite Batteries/Custom Airframes of America/Dragon Fire Customs and Guardian America.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to hezik)
       Post #: 219

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/9/2009 10:31 AM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Okay let's clear somethings out here. Fliton has FAILED to reply emails. Fact. Fliton Element is overweight, NOT a 100% fact as only SOME are overweight.

I have contacted Fliton and was told its their server that has an issue, I sent emails with a delivery report bit none came back. I remember 2 years back when their server kept forwarding their emails to us. I believe Fliton has sorted it out and I am getting my replacement Element soon. That I appreciate very much.

As stated earlier, only a few Elements were overweight and they got into the market. There was a slight issue in the factory that caused this. Its been sorted out so I was told if not don't tell me I am going to accept a replacement that is also overweight. That would be wasting time and money for Fliton.

Hezik ... let's not assume it will be probably 500g overweight. I can talk about EF too, somehow let's be frank, people will tolerate the misgivings from EF, I have seen many on the net and experienced it myself with the EF Extra 300 and Yak54 EP versions. Same with the H9 Funtana 90 with its wing failures and the H9 Extra 260 with its delaminating UC. Both were super hot items but had that tendency to go bad.

I own a Sebart too and let's be frank, they are built about as well as a Fliton and fly about as well too. However, the Sebarts are not cheap despite coming out from China. You will be surprised how much it costs to manufacture an EF or Sebart or any other branded ARF. So let's not start this I BELIEVE so and so is better. Heard it all and its the same thing. Sebarts and EF planes are not cheap, you pay a premium for them but then what are you really getting.

I got friends who have flown or seen Oxai planes, they are not that great for the price. That too is a fact. I believe the Element is not in full production yet. If it is and it does not live up to what they advertise, send it back to the LHS. Well, you have a contractual relationship with the LHS and not the manufacturer only. Let's see where Fliton goes with the Element and not jump up and down then only a couple of so called pre-sale planes have weight issues.

Let's be more passionate about the hobby and not the brand.

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to BHolsten)
       Post #: 220

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/10/2009 12:25 PM   
hezik


 

Posts: 613
Score: 109
Joined: 8/27/2006
Last Login: 10/28/2012
From: VleutenUtrecht, NETHERLANDS
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BHolsten

That is not completely true!


Say What? I don't know if you were responding to my message, but what I posted is entirely true. Fliton did not respon in any way.

quote:


vsilva contacted me many times via my email and through RC-U and I forwarded the emails and even had several conversations about the emails to specific factory people. As a Fliton Rep & Team pilot vsilva did get help from me as much as I could do for him.


who's vsilva? I'm talking about a dutch friend of mine who also got stuck with a lead fliton element 170, and he mailed fliton about it and got NO response at all.

quote:


So,.. to say no one from Fliton did not respond is not completely accurate,...perhaps not the right people responded. Let's not smack all the fliton people in the face by saying "no one responded" it's an unfair statement.


It is 100% accurate, no-one at fliton bothered to reply, not even a 'we got your email' message.

quote:


vsilva,...many apologies it not getting your problem taken care of. I will speak with a fliton dealer to see if you can get any help.


Would you be willing to do the same for another poor slob who got a heavy version?

Wether or not ALL elements are to heavy is besides the point. The way the situation is now, is that if you buy one, you risk the chance of getting a heavy version without any way to exchange it. I hope Fliton will realise this is a really bad situation and will try to make a little bit more effort to get happy customers. Right now I don't think anyone in the dutch F3A scene will buy a Fliton, based upon the current experience. I know I won't and i am in the market for a ship like this..

quote:


Hezik ... let's not assume it will be probably 500g overweight.


I'm not assuming anything, I have had the plane over here and weighted it, it IS about 500 grams or more overweight.

quote:


I can talk about EF too, somehow let's be frank, people will tolerate the misgivings from EF, I have seen many on the net and experienced it myself with the EF Extra 300 and Yak54 EP versions. Same with the H9 Funtana 90 with its wing failures and the H9 Extra 260 with its delaminating UC. Both were super hot items but had that tendency to go bad.


I have seen several (like 10+) EF planes and they all lived up to the expectations. However they are maybe to light for gas engines or people who fly them full throttle in dives and stuff like that. However, whicheverway you look at it, I have never heard of an EF, Sebart or Oxai plane which comes out of the box 500 grams above specification.

quote:


I own a Sebart too and let's be frank, they are built about as well as a Fliton and fly about as well too.


C'mon, this is simply not true. They're both made out of balsa and plywood, yeah, that's true, but that's about where the similarity stops. On the Element, Fliton has done nothing to reduce the weight, it's all massive wood. Compare:



to the inside of your fliton and then tell me they're constructed the same again

One thing I do agree about with you, that's the fact that EF and Sebart are similar quality. This is not strange, since they come from the same factory.

However, both Sebart and EF use Oracover to cover their planes, a high grade quality covering. I don't know the brand of covering used on the Fliton, but do know it's not Oracover, it's the same crappy covering as Kyosho uses, for instance on their Calmato. If you were to put a fuel angine on your Element 170, you'll have to re-cover it with good covering in less than a year, the stuff that's on there when you buy it, will never stay on longer than that.

quote:


However, the Sebarts are not cheap despite coming out from China. You will be surprised how much it costs to manufacture an EF or Sebart or any other branded ARF. So let's not start this I BELIEVE so and so is better. Heard it all and its the same thing. Sebarts and EF planes are not cheap, you pay a premium for them but then what are you really getting.


I'm not talking about 'heard'. I'm talking about having the actual experience, having handled the planes, and noted the difference in quality. It's there and clear to see for everyone who takes the trouble of looking. I'm not saying you're not paying extra for a brand name, but you're also getting a higher quality plane. There's 0% 'hearsay' in what I'm saying. As far as pricing goes, the picture above is a Sebart plance which comes out at the same price as the Fliton. Only downside is it's marginally smaller, it's 1m80 fuse length.

An even cheaper plane which is about 1kg lighter in total, is the E-Evolution (search for it at lindinger.at), it's not only cheaper, it comes with wingbags for wings and stabs. Ok, I think it's really an ugly plane, but it's affordable, light and flies well (again: no hearsay!).

quote:


I got friends who have flown or seen Oxai planes, they are not that great for the price.


Now let's be Frank, there's no comparison between an Oxai plane and this Element, from any perspective. True, Oxai's are way to expensive and I wouldn't buy an Oxai as well, but let's not go and say the quality of an Oxai is comparable to this Element..

quote:


That too is a fact. I believe the Element is not in full production yet. If it is and it does not live up to what they advertise, send it back to the LHS.


Wether or not it's in full production, doesn't matter. My friend bought one, no-one told him it's a 'not in full production' model and it does NOT live up to the promised weights, as stated, it's at least 500 grams too heavy. The LHS states he delivered the plane as was delivered to him by Fliton, which is totally true. Besides that, I don't know if you realise what the postage and packaging is on a plane this size. As a last remark: he bought it to fly contest with. If he were to send it back right now, he'd lose half the season.

Before we go there: lucky for him in the netherlands the beginner and novice class allow a plane to be heavier than 5kg.

quote:


Let's see where Fliton goes with the Element and not jump up and down then only a couple of so called pre-sale planes have weight issues.


This is NOT a pre-sale plane and i'm NOT jumping because it's too heavy, I'm 'jumping' because Fliton doesn't do anything about it, not even a simple reply to an email.

To be honest, I DO like the Element, if it were on par weightwise. It's a good looking plane, looks good in the air and flies well as well. To me it was a huge dissapointment it was way too heavy and fliton doesn't respond to inquiries about this. I'm not expecting top-notch quality for the price, can live with the fact that it's engineered 'old school' with a lot of formers, thick balsa and nothing done to reduce weight. As you mentioned, it's really reasonable priced so one can't expect a rolls-royce. However, one should be able to expect something that is not at least 500 grams to heavy.

Reasons why this plane is too heavy:
1) too thick balsa was used to cover the wing and fuse. Also there's a lot of reasonably dark balsa in the fuse, which means it's not only thick, but heavy as well
2) there's simply too much wood in the construction: all steering surfaces are solid wood, everything on the inside is solid wood, there's way too many formers in the aft-section
3) the covering is cheap quality, thick and heavy. After a while the colorlayer will seperate from the top layer
4) too much glue was used to glue it together

My apologies if i come accross a little blunt, to me it was really dissapointing, since I had high hopes for this plane. Was originally planning to get one myself. Also I'm not English, Dutch is my native language.


< Message edited by hezik -- 4/10/2009 1:07 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to BHolsten)
       Post #: 221

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/10/2009 3:26 PM   
tIANci



Posts: 10489
Score: 116
Joined: 1/15/2004
Last Login: 9/16/2011
From: Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
Status: offline
Hezik ... you are not blunt, you only want to read what you want in what we write. I do not wish to start something but I say this with much 'love', perhaps you need to learn to read things OBJECTIVELY. Example, I said do not assume, I mean all the Elements, I already said what happened with a few that got out. But your remarks seem to be sweeping based on that 1 plane. I am not paid by Fliton or am a brand rep, I did get a heavy one and my new one is on the way. Actually, I am ordering a few more for some friends too now that Fliton has informed me what happened.

As for when I say I heard, it comes from those who fly at that level and have touched/owned or checked an Oxai out in detail. I am not comparing an Oxai with the Element, I have to be nuts, so again, I ask you to be objective in how you read what we write. Its a mere hobby.

Regarding the EF comment, it is bunched along with other planes with examples. They have their own problems but what I am saying it not that its LOUSY but people will work around it and they just accept it, unless the wings are warped etc.

I owned a few Flitons and have flown them along with many planes and having flown my Sebart Angel, I dare to say that the Fliton Extra 330 Freestyle flies as nice as the Angel. I know it. Perhaps you need to try both to say where the similarity stops. Of course they still are different sort of planes but if we talk about how well it handles, both handle as well.

I shall leave it for now. Let's keep it as a happy hobby and learn to read things objectively. No point shoving our point down someone's throat with so much fervor.

_____________________________

Its nice to be important, but its more important to be nice ...
Revver Brotherhood No. 232

Hide Signatures

(in reply to hezik)
       Post #: 222

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/10/2009 5:59 PM   
wattsup


 

Posts: 588
Score: 100
Joined: 1/4/2009
Last Login: 12/18/2012
From: Franklin, TN, USA
Status: offline
tianci, Oh my goodness! You are truly in rare form. I understand hezik's disappointment. For some, participation in pattern flight has it's share. It seems to me, Fliton has their
own unique set of problems related to building "lead sleds"! This might even be a trend.You have to give hezik credit because not only was he specific in his approach but at times he was clear, concise & objective in his findings. These overseas manufacturers need to realize that they cannot ignore problems with their products halfway around the world & expect to survive in this global economic situation we all find ourselves in at this time. Let's face facts, simply put, if you elect to build junk it WILL catch up with you & you will find yourself on the losing end! It is just a matter of time because there will always be someone out here that will not put up with these second rate products & will take them to task in forums like this somewhere on the internet. I don't know about you, but hezik's command of the English language was clear enough for me! Now, who else would like to step up this week & get straightened out!____Regards, TNWalker

Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 223

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/10/2009 9:26 PM   
hezik


 

Posts: 613
Score: 109
Joined: 8/27/2006
Last Login: 10/28/2012
From: VleutenUtrecht, NETHERLANDS
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tIANci

Hezik ... you are not blunt, you only want to read what you want in what we write.


Offcouse I'll disagree .. and go further by saying it's the other way around. I'll explain what I mean:
quote:


Example, I said do not assume, I mean all the Elements, I already said what happened with a few that got out.


That is exactly the problem I'm having with it. I'm not saying all Elements are too heavy, I trust that if Fliton recognised some came out too heavy and they say they corrected the problem, that they actually did that.

Fact still remains that the first batch contained planes which were heavy and planes which were good. Fact is also that if someone has an Element in their shop right now, it's probably a first batch version. So if you go out and buy one, you're basically gambling. If you're lucky you'll get a 'good' one, if luck is not on your side you'll get a heavy one.

That in itself isn't even the major problemen, misstakes happen, and for a lot of people it won't even matter that much, as stated, even weigting in at about 5500~5600 grams, it still flies fine.. with a fuel engine you might even reach the 5kg mark, though barely and in heavy winds one could even say it's an advantage. However, the FAI rules are clear: 5kg and not an ounce more. So if you plan on competing with this plane, and you're on a limited budget, it's up to you wether or not you want to take the gamble of losing at least one season because you were the unlucky one that got a heavy one.

As I said, I'm not willing to take that gamble, especially since the aftersales support by fliton seems to be lacking.

quote:

Its a mere hobby.


Couldn't you have told me that before I sold my house for airplanes, my wife left me, and so on?

It is a hobby, true, in the end we're all grown men/women who go out on the field to play with their big toys. However, if you invest somewhere in the neighbourhood of 1000~1500 euro in a plane, you can at least expect whatever you get delivered meets the specifications.

quote:


Regarding the EF comment, it is bunched along with other planes with examples. They have their own problems but what I am saying it not that its LOUSY but people will work around it and they just accept it, unless the wings are warped etc.


True, true, but the problem is.. a plane which has a weak spot but is not too heavy is something you can work around. A plane which is 500 grams too heavy is.. well.. useless. The only way to get the 500 grams of of it, would be basically rebuilding half the thing. I''m contemplating removing the entire firewall, the cockpit floor and backside, half the formers and also make cutouts in the wing. The original landing gear was already replaced by a bolly gear.

quote:


I owned a few Flitons and have flown them along with many planes and having flown my Sebart Angel, I dare to say that the Fliton Extra 330 Freestyle flies as nice as the Angel. I know it. Perhaps you need to try both to say where the similarity stops. Of course they still are different sort of planes but if we talk about how well it handles, both handle as well.


Agreed, I'm not stating all fliton airplanes are too heavy or lack in quality. What I was saying is that IF you buy an element it's a gamble AND that, in my opninion, it also has it's quirks besides that, like bad covering.

quote:


I shall leave it for now. Let's keep it as a happy hobby and learn to read things objectively. No point shoving our point down someone's throat with so much fervor.


You'll have to understand that Fliton leaves me no choice on this matter. I'm helping a friend out by trying to get the point accross to Fliton that this is not the way to go. My apologies if I offended you in any way.

< Message edited by hezik -- 4/10/2009 9:47 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to tIANci)
       Post #: 224

RE: Fliton Element 170 - 4/10/2009 9:41 PM   
BHolsten


 

Posts: 876
Score: 100
Joined: 3/28/2007
Last Login: 5/23/2013
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Status: offline
hezik,..............

I am a Field Rep. for Fliton and at the time a Team Pilot for Fliton. I responded to everyone of vsilva's emails and private message and past along the information to the proper people. I went out of my way to help,...to even contact him recently to see if he had been taken care of yet. I am not a factory owner,...but I am a "Rep." with a high regard to customer service,..However, I don't make the decissions as to who gets helped. I very sorry vsilva has not been taken care of yet or has not been responded to yet by a Fliton factory person.

What I was saying is, as a Fliton Field Representative and Team pilot,......somone from the organization did respond,....me!!!!! So,..your statement is not entirely fair and accurate with regards to the comment he recieved no help. If it would satisfy you I would (not going to do as it would be totally un-professional of me) be more than happy to clear the air and forward all of the correspondence to you, as I save all the email and PM's that have customer service related issues that I have been involved in.

It's simply a slap to my face and all the time and effort I have put forward in helping people to get things resolved, technical support, etc.

I'm not mad, upset or pissed off,.....offended yes,..as I hope you would be if the shoe was on the other foot. I think your willingness to help shows your passion for the sport and your willingness to help another flyer. My hats off to you,...but you rarely get any results bashing a company or a product on an open forum. It usually will come back to haunt later on as/if you look for sponsors.

Please,..any negative comments related to this subject just PM me,..thats the proper way to vent,...thanks in advance

Bill Holsten

Hide Signatures

(in reply to wattsup)
       Post #: 225

Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>  
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Pattern Universe - RC Pattern Flying >> RC Pattern Flying >> RE: Fliton Element 170
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.609RCU1