CorsairJock
Posts: 1904
Joined: 4/14/2002 From: Parchment,
MI, USA Status: offline
|
OK, I gotta say it: I question the recommended (by Hangar 9) C.G: 3.75" behind the leading edge, where the chord is about 14.375". That's about 26%, which is far less than the other warbirds that I have (usually 30 ~ 33%) . All them have tapered wings, so that is not an issue. Top Flite recommends 5" for their B-25, and if we assume that because it is 10% larger: the root chord would be about 15.8125", the C.G. would be 31%. That sounds much more 'normal' to me, so I intend to throw caution into the wind and balance mine at least 4 1/4" back (with gear up), or about 29.5%. Any other thoughts on this? Anyone else question the CG on this plane? Keeping warbirds light has always worked very well for me. I especially HATE having to add weight to balance a plane, and I will do whatever I can to prevent having to do so. And it appears to me that while some prefer to build the planes to be 'crash proof': adding things such as double battery packs and other redundant items, adding extra strength to areas that they deem as insufficiency so, I prefer to shed weight whenever possible. LIGHTER planes fly better, and are less likely to crash (in my opinion).
_____________________________
Avatar: Electric Powered, Highly Modified Hangar 9 Corsair
|