slope-soarer
Posts: 226
Joined: 10/12/2004 From: Barrow in Furness, UNITED KINGDOM Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pe reivers That might indeed be a good idea. Still, it supports our first disagreement, on the use of so little ether. It has all the makings of a more critical setup. I found this too in my recent experiments, and almost a straight line (correlationwise) can be drawn from full ether setups, to the low ether contents that you experiment with. Below a certain point, which I believe to be 25% ether, Ignition improvers are needed to get a decently throttling engine. I am designing a double venturi setup this moment, alas without throttling capabilities, to find out the virtues of better fuel draw and better atomisations. My hopes are high, so let's hope my hope matches experience. Thanks for the comments Pe, I agree there should be a straight line correlation between high to low ether content. I do use ignition improver 2-ethylhexyl at 2% in the fuel mix. I think what caught me out was the fact that I have run this mix on a very cold day, but in a test stand. The prop wash in the test stand is obviously not cooling the engine off anywhere near as much as when the engine is operating on the plane. The engine started much as usual and throttles perfectly before launching, the engine was given time to heat up - a good minute or so as settings were finalised. Only after the initial full throttle run to gain altitude and then a minute or two after throttling back did the engine cut out. It was evidently getting too cold for efficient vapourisation of the fuel , or the compression was altering due to the engine cooling. It will be interesting to see how that double venturi works out. Greg, Your comments are spot on. The kerosene is supposed to be a difficult fuel to vapourise effectively. One of the benefits (to my way of thinking) about reducing the ether is increased engine temperature. That increased temperature should be beneficial to the fuel mix. I find with low ether content that the needle must indeed be set a 1/4 to 1/2 turn rich until the engine starts and generates some heat. The compression usually needs backing off quite quickly after starting and later the needle can be leaned out to normal running position. I think (and I may well be wrong) that the crankcase temperature is important with 2 strokes. If the crankcase cools because of the cold air flowing past it then the paraffin is not going to vapourise as well as if the crankcase is hotter. I will enclose the engine and fuel tank and see if restricting the airflow during cold weather restores the good running of the 10% ether mix. If I still get problems then I can revert to the 15% ether mix which has always run well, starts easily and I had no problems with it when I had to use it the other day. Andy, Your comments are also spot on. I don't want to revert to high ether content if at all possible. I reckon that I can use 15% without much problem. I reckon that if I prevent too much cold air flowing past the engine then I should be able to use the 10% ether mix. Possibly I need a cowl for cold weather and just remove it for summer flying. As I mentioned in the other post the whole engine, fuel tank and servo are completely unshrouded and hanging out in the full airflow.... Brrrrrrrr ! Reg
|