ac hauswald
Posts: 146
Joined: 3/13/2004 From: Houston,
TX, USA Status: offline
|
Hi Jimmy, Thanks for the input. What percentage methonol did NHRA cut the VHT with? Is that to aid in application? Does the methonol evaporate out after the VHT is applied to the track? Same mix for shutdown area, or does NHRA apply to racetrack length only? Curious, why did NHRA go with VHT over VP? I'm sure they tried both. SAMDRL has used both VHT and VP. I couldn't tell the difference in tractive grip between the two with my 2.5sec bracket/index rail. My timing slips didn't show any appreciable difference in 6ft times b/w the two either. Koford appears to work equally well with either. VP sponsors IMDRA, so the track gets LC-5 or LC-6 to apply during regional events and the world finals. During the worlds last October, Litespeed Raceway put down a full 55gal drum over the 4day period of the meet. The track was so sticky, I dropped a full two tenths (0.2sec) off my usual E.T. If you let your car set too long in staging, it would stick to the track and tear huge chunks out of the foam tire(s) on launch. I didn't run any Koford to help me launch out to the 6ft beam. Don't know what the Extreme Class cars were using for traction compound on their foams, but they didn't have any problem hooking up full length. Jimmy, maybe you could help with spray patterns and pressures in applying either VHT or VP? Right now, Litespeed Raceway is applying traction compund with a hand-pump spray bottle. Would adapting a spray bar to like a garden tractor still give even coverage over the track surface and provide the same grip? Should, but knowing how the "pro" sanctioning orgs apply the TC will be helpful. Again, Jimmy, thanks for checking in and providing the on-track/on-site info. AC
< Message edited by AHR43 -- 12/18/2007 3:20:07 PM >
_____________________________
Arnie Hauswald Racing 1943 RC Electric Drag Racing
|