RE: RE: Top Flite

RE: RE: Top Flite
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: RE: Top Flite

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: RE: Top Flite - 3/5/2004 10:48:05 AM

LDM

Posts: 5265
Joined: 5/29/2003
From: Denver, PA,
Status: online

lOve to see a p40
from a business standpoint consider the following
There are a ton corsairs out there already ,H9, Giant planes, Kondor, Great Planes smaller version , Tons of P51s
But no real options on P40s
The world model is a very poor excuse , all of the others are build kids , the new one that is in the works from Cermark is over $800.

(in reply to jeffhines13)

RE: RE: Top Flite - 3/6/2004 3:01:38 AM

Posts: 290
Joined: 6/19/2002
From: Sandy, UT, USA
Status: offline

My sources tell me that the ARF P-47 giant may make an appearance by the end of summer ...

(in reply to LDM)

RE: RE: Top Flite - 3/14/2004 4:14:40 AM

BigRod

Posts: 26
Joined: 3/4/2004
From: EdmontonAlberta, CANADA
Status: offline

I would like to see something other than the typical American warbird my vote is for the me109 or the mosquito It is just my opinion that the american warbirds are over done thanx

(in reply to Asanders)

RE: Top Flite - 4/15/2004 2:23:43 PM

Posts: 109
Joined: 4/13/2004
From: Mayaguez 00680, PUERTO RICO (USA)
Status: offline

Yeah...

well, let's review a bit here....Not everyone wants a giant scale bird, and the 1/7 scale line seems popular...The low side of it....too heavy for the size! How about a warbird with a thick airfoil, easy retract, fabric covering after the cockpit, about 65" wingspan....could be done with a .61 to 90 2 strokes....The one that carried the burden of the battle of Britain...the Hawker Hurricane!

(in reply to BigRod)

RE: Top Flite - 4/15/2004 3:09:06 PM

Yak18

Posts: 677
Joined: 1/20/2002
From: Southport, FL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: althepal

Yeah...

well, let's review a bit here....Not everyone wants a giant scale bird, and the 1/7 scale line seems popular...The low side of it....too heavy for the size! How about a warbird with a thick airfoil, easy retract, fabric covering after the cockpit, about 65" wingspan....could be done with a .61 to 90 2 strokes....The one that carried the burden of the battle of Britain...the Hawker Hurricane!

I'm with you althepal, amazing there aren't more Hurricanes on the market! It would make a great model for all the features you listed. It's one of the most model-friendly warbirds ever designed.

Yak

_____________________________

The Cub is the safest airplane in the world; it can just barely kill you.

(in reply to althepal)

RE: Top Flite - 4/15/2004 3:15:54 PM

P-51B

Posts: 6173
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: althepal

Yeah...

well, let's review a bit here....Not everyone wants a giant scale bird, and the 1/7 scale line seems popular...The low side of it....too heavy for the size! How about a warbird with a thick airfoil, easy retract, fabric covering after the cockpit, about 65" wingspan....could be done with a .61 to 90 2 strokes....The one that carried the burden of the battle of Britain...the Hawker Hurricane!

Yeah...well, let's review a bit here...the title of the thread is "The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird."

_____________________________

In order to think "outside the box", one must first accept there IS a box.

(in reply to althepal)

RE: Top Flite - 4/15/2004 3:26:48 PM

Posts: 202
Joined: 4/1/2003
From: Alta Loma, CA, USA
Status: offline

I would like to see a Grumman E-2C Hawkeye, or a variant C-2A. These planes are just not seen very often.

Lew

(in reply to P-51B)

RE: Top Flite - 4/15/2004 7:51:04 PM

MSabol

Posts: 33
Joined: 2/23/2004
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Status: offline

I know that they probably won't do a twin, but I would like to see a 60 sized P-38, perhaps with twin 0.60's, at about an 80" wingspan. Cuurently, if you want to build a P-38 it is either huge (like the 110" Ziroli) or park flyer sized.

(in reply to lbrande)

RE: Top Flite - 4/16/2004 2:58:26 AM

Posts: 818
Joined: 12/21/2002
From: Saugus, CA, USA
Status: offline

Is this all dreaming? or are all you guys being realistic? Top Flite is in business to make money! sure i would like to see a kit of any of these planes that has been suggested but look at Top Flites history with warbirds-P-51B,P-40E,P-39?,F4U-1,F8F-2,A6M,then the gold edition kits F4U-1,P-51D,P-40E,P-47D,P39?,T-6,Spitfire MkIX,FW-190,Seafury,and any giant scale plane that they come out with will just be a blow up of one of these. they stopped making the T-6 kit! and I,ll bet the P-39 is next to go! If they cant sell thousands of kits of whatever they make then keep on dreaming.hey if we are going to be dreaming, i would like Top Flite to come out with a P-38!

_____________________________

If it's not scale,it's not worth building.

(in reply to MSabol)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/18/2004 9:10:27 PM

Posts: 35
Joined: 5/18/2004
From: , NY, USA
Status: offline

hello guys,
im new at this webcite thing and fairly new to building rc planes, i am building a topflite giant f4u corsiar and i cant deside on a motor. any input would be good ty

AL

(in reply to ramcfarland)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/19/2004 12:01:48 AM

P47 Thunderbolt

Posts: 362
Joined: 2/1/2002
From: Brighton, MI, USA
Status: online

Go with a Zenoah G62. Proven motor with great power and relatively inexpensive condering other gas motors. Plus, you will need the nose weight. Most warbirds and all of Top Flite's kits build tail heavy.

(in reply to calibosss)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/19/2004 1:11:22 AM

Posts: 96
Joined: 9/1/2002
From: So. Lebanon, OH, USA
Status: offline

"all of Top Flight's kits build tail heavy"?

My F4u "red box" came out just right. Gold edition P-51 came out nose heavy,
currently building Giant P-47, can't wait to see how that one comes out.

As to their next kit, my vote was for the F6F, though a B-17 at 90" would be a
close second.

Mike

(in reply to P47 Thunderbolt)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/19/2004 2:22:39 AM

toy264

Posts: 293
Joined: 9/28/2002
From: Magnolia, TX, USA
Status: offline

Got to put in a plug for the J2M3 Raiden ("Jack). Nice moments and a big fuselage. Failing that, a "Tony".

Attachments

Click to see fullsize image.

Click for fullsize

_____________________________

*Sigh*....I've got it.

(in reply to M_Callahan)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/19/2004 11:40:13 PM

Posts: 535
Joined: 4/27/2004
From: meridian, ID, USA
Status: offline

I vote for the Raiden too! 1/5 scale woud get about 88" w/s. Robart p-51 mains would be perfect... But as scale detail pointed out, it would never happen from the good old boys from topfiite. Count on them choosing:
1. a popular subject (One that's already been done to death:Zero--Oh for crying out loud, go buy a world models ARF!; Spit or P-40? Can you say PICA?)
2. Most likely a subject they themselves have done before in a smaller scale (p-40,Spit,Seafury...)
3. Could fly (in theory) on a US41.

Don't get your Mosquito hopes up.
sbm

(in reply to toy264)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/20/2004 3:34:14 AM

Posts: 781
Joined: 4/25/2004
From: Chandler, TX, USA
Status: offline

Bring back the P-51B with the correct wing, not the D model conversion they have currently. Also include an optional Malcom Hood canopy. I still have the decals from the red box P-51B and owuld love to build another one.

(in reply to scalebirdman)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/20/2004 9:49:42 PM

morro

Posts: 213
Joined: 9/20/2003
From: AdelaideNot-applicable, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline

Having built Topflite kits, does someone know if a large scale spit is on the drawing board. with people saying that some spitfire kits dont look scale maybe Topflite can get it right.

Todd

(in reply to Connery)

RE: The next Top Flite Giant Scale Warbird - 5/21/2004 4:45:58 PM