Posts: 273
Joined: 9/28/2004 From: Monroe,
WA, USA Status: offline
Seeing Carver Tripp's great looking Top Flite GS Mustang in this thread Carver Tripp's Mustang with his modified and much improved cowl shows that this area is the least accurate of an otherwise reasonably scale appearing Mustang. There are a couple of other areas that could be improved (the horizontal stab location, the canopy and the thickness of the top of the dorsal fiin), but they are not nearly so obvious as the cowl.
Late last year I started on the mold for a new cowl for the TF GS Mustang. The objectives were to (1) remove the droop and make the top cowl profile closer to scale (2) use a 5-1/2" spinner which is much closer to scale (3) improve the chin scoop appearance and (4) incorporate the cowl bulges over the forward valve covers. The cowl was designed to use the stock firewall although the engine would have to be raised 1/4" over the kit location.
I had originally hoped to have the cowl end just ahead of the windshield and break along the actual cowl lines so that iit could be fitted to all the GS kits - ARF / ARC and kit. The aft part of the cowl layup would be light transitioning to heaver over the engine bay. However I later discovered that the shape of the existing lower fuselage behind the firewall means the cowl will have to extend back past the leading edge of the wing. This unfortunately means it would be more than just a slide on accesssory for the ARF, thus reducing the sales potential.
I estimate this new cowl would add 4-6 ozs wt vs the TF cowl (I've been molding and kitting in fiberglass since the 60's so I think that's a reasonable estimate). The air filter hole locations would be molded into it as well as the major panel lines and the outline for the manifold cut outs.
About the time I found the problem with fairing the cowl into the fuselage I had foot surgery which kept me out of action until just recently. Now I need to decide if I want to go further with the project or not.
So my question is ... how many of you would be interested in a more to scale replacement cowl? If there isn't enough interest there's not much incentive in going ahead. I think the cost (with a custom fitted set of my scale exhaust manifolds) would be around $100 plus shipping. Perhaps a bit more.
If you have an interest, PM me. There's no obligation ... I just want to get a feeling for how much interest there is. At the same time feel free to post any suggestions or comments here
(The picture below shows the current state of the cowl plug which has the foward portion of the cowl plug roughed in - the extensions over the fuselage have yet to be added.)
Tony Pacific Scaled Aircraft
< Message edited by tony-howard -- 7/26/2007 7:10:05 PM >
Posts: 1171
Joined: 10/22/2002 From: Troy,
OH, USA Status: offline
I don't understand the $100.00 price tag. Most comerical cowls of this size run about $35.00-$50.00. I can make my own exhaust stacks a lot cheaper than $50.00 just my thoughts.
Posts: 273
Joined: 9/28/2004 From: Monroe,
WA, USA Status: offline
Gary, I appreciate your comments ...
But have you actually seen one of my exhaust kits up close ? They're more accurate than anything else I know of on the market. It would take someone of at least your skills to replicate them as well.
There's a couple of reasons for the additional cost over and above the exhaust kit. Most of the commerical cowls are quite a bit shorter than this one. And those I've seen from the suppliers have a less sophisticated layup than I would want to use. Carefull layups and bigger pieces take more time. And I don't see this cowl as having a large market.
There's a also significant investment - both time and money - making the plug from scratch and making molds, creating and having laser cut any extra parts (like a support eyebrow at the top of the firewall), writing instructions, billing costs, answering all the e-mails, etc. All of that has to be amortized into the final cost.
On the other hand if it's too expensive so that not enough modelers are interested - well, that's what I need to find out. Sounds like a 'no' from you - right? <grin>
Tony Pacific Scaled Aircraft
< Message edited by tony-howard -- 7/26/2007 10:08:26 PM >
Posts: 4335
Joined: 4/1/2003 From: Springfield, VA, Status: offline
Tony I have a question. When I built my GS TF P-51 I modified the top and sides of the front of the fuse. I had to redraw the plans and make new formers to bring it to a better scale look. Do you do any such thing with your new cowl? Thanks.
Posts: 273
Joined: 9/28/2004 From: Monroe,
WA, USA Status: offline
Bob
Good question ...
The idea was to have an extended cowl create all the contour changes. A small C shaped eyebrow support on the top and bottom of the existing firewall would support the cowl at those locations (the cowl is the same width as the existing fuselage). As I envisioned it, the cowl could either be permanently attached to the fuselage with a hatch cutout for access to the engine or it would be removed as a single piece.
Probably the best looking would be to fasten it down and fair it into the fuselage.
I'll upload a diagram shortly that may make more sense.
Tony Pacific Scaled Aircraft
< Message edited by tony-howard -- 7/27/2007 3:33:26 AM >
Posts: 32
Joined: 2/3/2002 From: Owatonna,
MN, USA Status: offline
Tony,
I would be interested. I did purchase your exhaust kit for My RTC TF GS Stang and am extremely happy and pleased with the way it turned out. Beautiful design! Thanks again for providing such a much needed product.
Posts: 866
Joined: 2/22/2004 From: Warner Robins,
GA, USA Status: offline
I'd be interested. I've been wanting to build a TF GS Mustang RTC, but the cowl has always put me off. $100 isn't too unfair IMO. And if your still looking for opinions, I like your idea to build the cowl into the fuse and have an access hatch fo the engine. I think that's what I understand from one of your earlier posts, anyways.
_____________________________
When someone loses a plane in the pits, you do a lomcevak duck. Press Alt F4 to see my other witty line.
Posts: 273
Joined: 9/28/2004 From: Monroe,
WA, USA Status: offline
You've got it right. Making the engine hatch the builder's responsibility seems at this point to make more sense since there are so many engine / muffler options to accommodate. At least that's my thinking at this point.
Posts: 208
Joined: 4/10/2002 From: north port, FL, USA Status: offline
HEY TONY I WOULD BE INTERESTED , I HAVE A COUPLE TOP FLITE MUSTANGS ALREADY DONE BUT I WOULD PURCHASE ANOTHER JUST SO I COULD USE YOUR COWL. MAKE IT AND THEY WILL BUY!!!!
Posts: 467
Joined: 1/9/2003 From: Watertown,
WI, USA Status: online
quote:
ORIGINAL: tony-howard About the time I found the problem with fairing the cowl into the fuselage I had foot surgery which kept me out of action until just recently. Now I need to decide if I want to go further with the project or not.
So my question is ... how many of you would be interested in a more to scale replacement cowl? If there isn't enough interest there's not much incentive in going ahead. I think the cost (with a custom fitted set of my scale exhaust manifolds) would be around $100 plus shipping. Perhaps a bit more.
Tony Pacific Scaled Aircraft
Tony,
As is typical with good ideas, people think of them at the same time. I started the exact same project about 2 years ago and then ran into some work related challenges on my day job and didn't get it on the market. It is back to the front of the list and I will likely introduce it this fall. From the pictures you can see that the cowl plug needs just one more primer coat and then a wet sanding before it is ready to make the mold. It is built to the 5.5" spinner and has a much more scale intake and more pronounced bulges at the top for the engine rocker covers. I spent a long time contemplating the scale split line locations and multiple thickness of laminate as you describe. I finally settled on that approach being expensive and not practical for the TF level model. This design will fit-up flush to the existing firewall of both ARF and ARC TF Kits. It will have a knotched back edge with a glassed on plywood perimeter that will be permanently bonded to the firewall. Engine access will be a removable access panel from the bottom that will be stepped in much like the Yellow Spitfire Cowl Conversion Kit I make today. To do this compromises had to be made to mesh-up with the dead flat side walls and the bottom blend moving down toward the wing has a slightly uncomfortable transition to it, but it works. Let's not lose sight of what we are doing here. We are dressing-up a TF Mustang. So it will always be less than perfect. We are not building a $2,700 Aero-Tech. In addition to the cowl I am doing a drop-on "A", "B", "C" style razor back made of fiberglass that works with the stab moved up to scale position. So all in all we are on parallel paths here. I've already made the decision to do it. So if you go for it as well then we will just cut each others volume in half, or you could possibly do the longer extended version you mention to pick-up the scale split lines and more properly shaped lower portion thus our products would be differentiated from each other. It is your choice. I can tell you that I have no plans to do any exhausts, so I should probably scribe the cut-outs to match the exhausts you make. I did talk to Calvin over at KELEO about scale exhausts, but now I have gone a little cold on that because of the complications it presents and the need to cut out part of the firewall near the back to get them installed correctly. I cannot see many TF type modelers doing that. So it will be very interesting to see what you think. The best to you in your pursuits. This certainly is a good idea.
Leo Spychalla Spychalla Aircraft LLC
< Message edited by Spychalla Aircraft -- 8/3/2007 6:02:36 AM >
Posts: 273
Joined: 9/28/2004 From: Monroe,
WA, USA Status: offline
Leo
Shortly after I started thinking about this project I came across your cowl threadl. Very nice – thanks for posting the pictures of your cowl plug.
We are – as you say – on different paths for improving the cowl appearance. I realized early on that projecting the fuselage lines forward of the firewall can only result in a partial scale improvement, particularly in the area of the lower half of the cowl. I ultimately decided after a lot of sketching and mock-ups that making the cowl a slip-on unit extending aft past the firewall is the only way bring the forward cowl profile lines and contours as close to scale as possible. Raising the thrust line in addition to the larger spinner then removed any suggestion of that awful TF 'hooked nose'. (Now if we could only get the spinner makers to make a truly scale Mustang spinner.)
The question of what improvements model builders are willing to pay for is the issue. When I look at the number of online thread postings showing the interest in scale modifications, it appears there is a definite interest by some in improving the scale appearance of the Top Flite GS Mustang. And I've had a number of PM's showing interest in my cowl. The number of exhaust kits I've sold to the TF GS Mustang seems to support that conclusion as well. So I think there is at least a limited market.
I will make my decision next week whether to proceed or not. I have one other advantage and it's that I'm retired. So I have control over my priorities – at least when my wife doesn't provide me with some!
Let's keep in touch. And good luck to you.
Tony Howard Pacific Scaled Aircraft
< Message edited by tony-howard -- 8/3/2007 6:15:56 PM >
Printable Version
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> Improving the TF GS Mustang Cowl 
Improving the TF GS Mustang Cowl - 
