KidEpoxy
Posts: 3604
Joined: 10/14/2004 From: San Antonio,
TX, USA Status: offline
|
"There is a god!" sure, cause it would suck if folks were given choices in ballots. Is this because STL fears people would vote for Horrace? And the last thing STL would want is someone winning an election by Recieving Votes? Is there something wrong about the members voting for the person they want elected, something STL needs to prevent with Divine Ballot Tampering? Or is about not allowing folks to vote for candidates STL doesnt like.... Didnt Russia/China have the One Party System? Anyone that might get votes is not allowed to run. It would be in step with the Uncontested Ballots for so many Districts last ballot: Anyone that might have gotten votes is barred, and we get the swell voter return numbers... just like last year- 'Vote for the only candidate, or not' A. If STL believed Horrace wouldnt win in the election, why would he care if his name was on the ballot: He would not be president by not winning the election. Put Horrace, BasinBum, BillyHell, and JohnCasey on the ballot... heck, put 20 or thirty people on it... why not, if they are not going to win, they wont even take long to count the lack of votes. B. If STL believed Horrace would win the popular vote of the members, STL is more concerned with getting his way than the majority of the Voting AMA Membership getting their way.... Yes, thank god the membership is denied the ability to elect someone STL doesnt want.
_____________________________
Optional MA is part of AMA history, we can go optional AGAIN if we just say so
|