RE: compression comparison and exhaust color  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Everything Diesel >> RE: compression comparison and exhaust color Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/15/2007 6:23:04 AM   
SGC


 

Posts: 1040
Joined: 12/8/2004
From: OAKEYQueensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: online
Andy,
Sorry to hear of your brothers condition, my thoughts will be for an easy time till the end, and I hope your current family isues are quickly and easily resolved.
Stewart

(in reply to AndyW)
       Post #: 51

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/15/2007 3:43:13 PM   
blw



Posts: 4619
Joined: 3/15/2004
From: Auburn, AL, USA
Status: offline
Greg,

Bob did not make any threats of a lawsuit. He was merely stating the possibililty if one markets dangerous fuels. Let's knock off the arguing about this. There is no need to target him.

Andy- sorry to hear about your brother.

_____________________________

The ultimate responsibility of pilots is to fulfill the dreams of the countless millions who can only stare skyward...and wish.

(in reply to SGC)
       Post #: 52

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/15/2007 4:55:06 PM   
gkamysz


 

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/24/2003
From: Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Status: online
I did not say Mr. Davis made threats. Nor should one infer that from my statements. It is my opinion that those statements were made to deter people from experimenting.

_____________________________

Greg

(in reply to blw)
       Post #: 53

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/15/2007 10:51:57 PM   
slope-soarer


 

Posts: 226
Joined: 10/12/2004
From: Barrow in Furness, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
Oh heck !

Unfortunately I know, from past experience, that numerous people can all attend a meeting/conference/training session, whatever. Talking to a number of them after such an event will make you wonder whch meeting they actually attended as it didn't bear much resemblance to what you heard and saw !

I will try and make it as clear as possible for those who seem to be reading some phantom comments as opposed to the real ones.

Davis diesel heads are UNDOUBTEDLY a fine piece of kit. They have done a lot for the world of model diesels and the engineering is ,reportedy, very good.... I haven't been in a position to handle one myself.

Davis, along with other suppliers provide ready made model diesel fuel. It will be of excellent quality and will do the job intended. Some make their fuel ingredients and quantities available, some do not.... although it shouldn't be too hard to work out approximately what they are using and in what quantities. Have a guess.... what would be the most likely ingredient to be increased from fuel for engines with roller bearings to fuel for plain bushed engines ? Go on it doesn't take a genius to work it out ! What is the likely mix for 1/2A engines ? It's not rocket science , or black magic.

Davis fuel used with either Davis conversion heads or Paw engines, or other diesels will probably work just fine. For those who want to buy a head, or a complete engine and also use commercially made fuel then.... there quest is over, they already have what they seek for easy starting and steady running.

The only BIG problem could come if the circumstances are right. Someone uses a Conversion head and commercial fuel. After initially setting the compression and needle he finds that he never needs to alter them again. The engine starts everytime and runs well so what's to alter ? Nothing - usually. The problem arises if the fuel is considerably altered from that normally used. Our modeller will shove it in the tank, start up as per normal and when the engine gets up to temperature then..... there may well be a big problem as in the case of the Canadian quoted.

If he NEVER uses a radically different fuel mix then our modeller will have a happy life and enjoy his engines !

The POINT I was making(not a derogatory comment) was that..... engines with conversion heads seem to have the settings left alone after initial setup. When started the engine brrrppps for a bit until the heat builds up and the compression comes up to normal running levels. This does NOT detract from an engine with conversion head, it's just the way people normally use them.

Other engines NEED an increase in compression in order to get a good start, this is backed off as the engine comes up to normal temperature.

The difference in the way the two engines are started leads to the conversion head engine being more susceptible to damage than the one which is normally altered for every start.... you can see the trap ! If the oil content is markedly increased then the conversion headed engine is the most likely to be caught out.... not because it is inferior.... but because of the way it is normally operated and because the operator hasn't appreciated the possible danger. If the same commercial fuel is always used then the problem will not arise. What happens if there is a delay in getting the normal fuel and our intrepid adventurer decides to make some to tide him over. He knows of a mix that always used to be used and make some up..... after all, he never did know what was in the commercial stuff he was getting.....??? If he is a UK modeller then he can just go to Model Technics website and see there the ingredients and quantities used in their fuels !

Simple isn't it. No slanderous remarks, no accusations of lying just an attempt to clarify an event that was supposed to have happened but was being obfuscated by indicating it was caused by a silly choice of fuel ! There was nothing wrong with the fuel mix just that the potential problem wasn't appreciated by the user.

There are those who are trying to find alternative ways of running diesel engines, we are not trying to drag those who are quite happy to use commercial fuel into our camp. Of course it works well and it suits many people to just buy it and use it..... no problem there.

There are also those who are prepared to look at alternatives, isn't that how the human race progresses with the constant search for knowledge ? We don't insult the commercial fuel users yet.... there are some users AND suppliers that seem to see us as a threat to the future of model diesel engines ? Hmmmmmm. To those who are happy with just using commercial products then great, you are home and dry ! Some of us will still persist in trying to find different ways and also develop better understanding. We sometimes need someone to make us think "outside the box" when that happens then some will be overcome with curiosity and start delving further.

Both camps should be happy and should certainly not denigrate each other. If modern diesel engines and fuel are so good then why are the majority of modellers using GLOW and increasingly ELECTRIC ???

Now why is it that those using alternative "homebrew" fuel are told they should buy the
commercial stuff because it works ? MY fuel WORKS, easily and efficiently every time I use it. I don't reckon that everyone should use it, but I am happy to give the ingredients and quantities for those who are possibly interested. I will also relate my experiences of using it... I have no commercial interest or gain in mind just a healthy curiosity and the urge to do things differently.

Just because YOU use (or sell) commercial fuel doesn't mean everyone should. Just because I and others make our own fuel doesn't mean that everyone should.

Just look at the topics on this group. The ones involving fuel mixes and alternative ingredients have a huge number of posts. How many are there discussing commercialy sold fuel ? Which topic seems to generate the most interest ?

Reg



Reg

(in reply to gkamysz)
       Post #: 54

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/15/2007 11:10:46 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10871
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
Those of us who use comercially available fuel have no need to discuss it as I mentioned above, you would get real tired real quick if I did talk about it all the time, when ones says that it works you're done talking, that's it. Talking about flying your Diesel powered plane generates very little interest either except at the field and they always draw a crowd.

_____________________________

"I have gone faster backwards, upside down and on fire than most people have gone at all" Don Garlits

(in reply to slope-soarer)
       Post #: 55

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 2:50:43 AM   
gkamysz


 

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/24/2003
From: Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Status: online
Hobbsy, I agree with you. But what if when you took your unusual diesel out to the field everyone told you that newer better glow engines were invented fifty years ago and they work the best, so you shouldn't be bothering with that stinky, cantankerous diesel. Or maybe even that electric power has evolved to the point that IC is obsolete? Or maybe even worse what if you showed up at your field with a model you actually built from scratch and was told that the people in China who build models everyday can do a better job so there is no point in building models anymore? I could go on and on, but that is not the point. If people like to say that they want to buy fuel that's fine. You and I know it works. If people want to tell us that the fuel mixes we know to be good are "bad" or "dangerous". If they are dangerous, be a gentleman and explain yourself so that nobody gets hurt. If an engine fails because somebody mixed fuel, maybe they should be taught why, instead of being given a referral to a place to buy fuel. You know teach the man to catch fish, rather than buying him a McFish sandwich.

I will always refer a diesel newb to a purchased diesel fuel, if they can actually purchase it. If they can't buy it, but can get components, then you know what happens.

_____________________________

Greg

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 56

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 6:43:13 AM   
AndyW


 

Posts: 1919
Joined: 1/17/2003
From: Timmins, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
BLW,

Thanks for the expression of care.

And a big thanks for the edit. That's not my normal style, emotion got the best of me.

That's how that kind of thing can happen and I apologize.

Thanks as well to everyone for the good wishes.

Health before wealth and wisdom above all.



_____________________________

Andy Woitowicz

(in reply to blw)
       Post #: 57

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 3:47:29 PM   
slope-soarer


 

Posts: 226
Joined: 10/12/2004
From: Barrow in Furness, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: blw

Greg,

Bob did not make any threats of a lawsuit. He was merely stating the possibililty if one markets dangerous fuels. Let's knock off the arguing about this. There is no need to target him.



Sorry blw, but I will question this.

What was written was along the lines of (and I am not going to look it up word for word)....
anyone writing about fuel mixes online would be regarded as the "teacher" and as such would be laying themselves open to lawsuits. This implies that I and others who discuss and give details of our own fuel mixes are at risk of legal proceedings.

No-one is looking to knock a guy who has done sterling service for model diesels. However, missleading or even patently wrong statements need addressing before they become accepted as fact by others. There did not seem to be either a genuine motive or even genuine factual content in some of the statements that were made, all I saw was an attempt to dissuade, or ridicule attempts at alternative approaches.

It would appear that a number of others also saw the posts as something that needed challenging.

Reg


(in reply to blw)
       Post #: 58

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 4:10:45 PM   
slope-soarer


 

Posts: 226
Joined: 10/12/2004
From: Barrow in Furness, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hobbsy

Those of us who use comercially available fuel have no need to discuss it as I mentioned above, you would get real tired real quick if I did talk about it all the time, when ones says that it works you're done talking, that's it. Talking about flying your Diesel powered plane generates very little interest either except at the field and they always draw a crowd.


Hobbsy,
Correct you have no need to discuss your commercial fuel as it is a stable and known quantity, especially for those manufacturers who publish the ingredients of their fuel mixes.

Any discussion would very quickly have to revert to the colour and graphics of the containers it is supplied in.

You inform us that you have used such fuel for 17 years without problem and some have advised that we all do the same and buy commercial fuel and just go fly.

Fortunately, we are NOT all cast in the same standard mould. Some like to be more creative and look for alternative ways. This does in fact ADD to the interest of the hobby. What would be said to those masters of engineering who MAKE model engines..... you should just buy a mainstream brand and go fly ? I suppose we should all just buy ARTF and not attempt to build from kits, or even more unforgivable..... scratch build our own designs ?

Those making fuel mixes are sharing ideas and discussing how/why/if/how well the fuel does indeed work. Those not interested in the subject can ignore these posts.... just as I would ignore your dissertations on your commercial fuel. If it doesn't interest you then you are not forced to read it.

If you want to compare engines O.K... there are even reviews. If you want to know what size prop then ask, or even quicker try a few, you can even check the revs at the same time. But how many have ever considered the actual fuel they use and what the ingredients do and just how they do it ?
They spend hours trawling through magazines and reviews and comparing with others which engine to buy next. Then they go and just buy some fuel.... just because that fuel is available doesn't mean it is the ONLY way of going about it.

That is one of the really wonderfull things about our hobby... the potential for diversification.
Free flight, control line, vintage, seaplanes, scale, 1/2A all attract their followers. Diesel engines attract people who like to make their own fuel as well as enjoying running these engines. The idea is to select the things that interest YOU and then expand your knowledge where possible.

Reg


(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 59

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 6:35:29 PM   
AMB


 

Posts: 3964
Joined: 6/10/2003
From: winter park, FL, USA
Status: offline
Slope Soarer/we may need the addition of a sub-forum on diesel fuels , there is of course a fuel forum but you have to go thru a lot of stuff

Thus would leave us here with the running and flying of diesels tech help , recomending engines, which ones work the best in what type of plane prop recs etc

An other point is with the growth of electric there is a fair amount of reverse engineering with the guys converting built up arfs to either glow or diesel again this gets sort of buried on
the half A site

Just my thought but there seems to be a greater selection of 1/2A in diesel than glow PAW of course comes to mind with their 033 06 and 09 the Sharma 09 plus tons of other classics laying around also if you want to "stretch" 1/2A to 10 you of course have the OS with an off the shelf head from Davis along with the Cox conversions martin
Buying factory fuel or using formulas ( Davis supplied formulas for non USA users) and those supplied by the engine makers is the easiest way out for most of us, This certainly reduces the risk of damaging or destroying an engine martin



< Message edited by dieseldan -- 9/16/2007 6:45:44 PM >

(in reply to slope-soarer)
       Post #: 60

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 8:10:49 PM   
Ed Cregger


 

Posts: 8052
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Ringgold, GA, USA
Status: online
The problem is that Mr. Davis can't forget that this was his manufacturer's forum at one time. He apparently feels the need to edit and moderate this forum as though it were his personal property. I posted a solution to this problem a short while ago and then removed it, feeling it was probably most disconcerting to Davis customers because agreeing with me made them fear being "blackballed" when it came to buying new supplies. For many people, Davis Diesel is their sole supplier. He has been, is and most likely will continue to be my major model Diesel supplier too.


Ed Cregger

edited by moderator for unnecessary remarks

< Message edited by blw -- 9/17/2007 2:07:00 AM >


_____________________________

"Flying models since the Fifties"

Saito Club Member #52

(in reply to AMB)
       Post #: 61

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/16/2007 9:26:16 PM   
gkamysz


 

Posts: 1793
Joined: 6/24/2003
From: Crystal Lake, IL, USA
Status: online
We have the diesel forum and other than a handful of posts about engines themselves, 95% of the discussion in the past year has been about alternative fuels. There simply aren't enough users of diesels that need basic help. Some of you may remember the survey I did and it showed that over 90%(?) of diesel users are experienced. So the typical engine talk you see in the glow forum simply doesn't exist because there is no need for it. We've had a few newbies come in and have helped. We've even been able to attempt to help people that don't have access to commercial diesel fuel or even ether in the last case, with the experience we gained trough efforts to find alternative fuels.

I seriously doubt anyone supporting the alternative fuel thread will say that commercial fuel is a waste of time, especially for anyone getting into the hobby.

I'm going to repeat this, I've said it before. By not making all aspects of diesel freely available knowledge, we are limiting the influx of new people. Today, hobbies need to have supporting information to be interesting. We live in an information age. A person new to diesel needs to understand why the engine manufacturer recommends their fuel, and why a homebrew, from a random formula might not work as well or at all. I am one of those people. If I visited Davis site when I was starting the hobby I would have never attempted, because everything would have been a secret. Instead I got catalogs from Carlson which had basic information about fuels and what type of engine and application suits types of blends. That gave me freedom to buy or mix fuel how and where I wanted. To me the question arose "Davis has these nice products, but what would happen if Davis disappeared?" What kind of fuel would I use, since I have no idea what's in it?

There are people who don't mind being locked in to one source, and if that doesn't bother them they have the freedom to choose that. I'm not going to force anyone to try my mixes. If you don't like four strokes that's fine, I won't make you convert yours. I never tried to convert anyone to electric when I was in it and had good performing aircraft 10 years ago. The aircraft spoke for themselves. People asked questions, because they wanted INFORMATION.

_____________________________

Greg

(in reply to merugo)
       Post #: 62

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/17/2007 12:02:49 AM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10871
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
Ed, Mr. Davis can neither Moderate nor Edit posts, he is not a Moderator, w8ye and BLW are the Moderators here.

_____________________________

"I have gone faster backwards, upside down and on fire than most people have gone at all" Don Garlits

(in reply to gkamysz)
       Post #: 63

RE: compression comparison and exhaust color - 9/17/2007 1:39:23 AM   
AMB


 

Posts: 3964
Joined: 6/10/2003
From: winter park, FL, USA
Status: offline
Ed on this one I disagree, First off telephones a very impersonal form of discussions, I am quite sure if this discussion occured face to face with Bob Davis your opinion would be much different, He does have a vast knowledge of model aircraft and engines going back over 50 years and is only trying to share this information, after receiving it you are free
to act on it any way you want. I have met Davis several times here in Florida and you do not have the time restraints of a phone. The same type of phone conversation you describe with Davis I have had also and found it interesting