abel_pranger
Posts: 2371
Joined: 5/7/2003 From: St Augustine, FL, Status: offline
|
quote:
Listen Abel, here is the bottom line, the members say counts when they respect the AMA bylaws. If they don't respect and utilize the channels and procedures granted to them then what's the point of having them in the first place? The AMA membership is in fact a by-product of the corporation. It's written in plain English in the bylaws, just start from the beginning. The point I'm trying to make with LCS is the fact that his rights end with the membership benefits. He and a few others think he's above what the AMA produces and part of the corporation itself, and they are not. The AMA does not issue stock. Jim Cherry DOES NOT have answer to the members. He answers to the EC and if the EC decides it's in the best interest of the membership, they will relay the info to the members directly or in public, their choice. Dion- I'm falling way behind on this discussion - bear with me, I have a life. Do you remember a post by Bill Oberdieck to this forum a few years ago that addressed the subject of AMA member's rights? Tried to find it, but apparently didn't happen on to the key search term(s). Anyway, it was not well received, but he may have had it right in the sense of reality vs. "Its your organization!" sales tripe. What you are saying paraphrases his words, so you may be right as well. Wish I could find that post.........as he is running for AMA prexy and has declined to discuss his positions in the forums, it seems like something those that will vote should take into consideration re where he stands. Abel edited to correct deletion of a formatting operator
< Message edited by abel_pranger -- 8/31/2007 7:50:40 PM >
|