quote:

Recently 2 Closed Doors activities at Muncie have generated a lot of discussion here, and brought up the topic of having less happen at Muncie that the Members are not priveleged to. The subject of those closed door activities doesnt really matter for this question.

As President, would you do something to reduce the amount of AMA activity that is secreted away from the members?
Such as crating some kind of path for getting info autorized for release, other than just asking our DVP and hitting a Muncie closed door.

(I am asking on behalf of another RCU poster from another thread, but he had a good question for the candidates)




<edit: Memebers?? Maybe a few less E's and I'd get Members >

< Message edited by KidEpoxy -- 9/10/2007 4:31:50 PM >

quote:

If you don't ENJOY your membership benefits, quit, you threatened it, now do it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

quote:

Recently 2 Closed Doors activities at Muncie have generated a lot of discussion here, and brought up the topic of having less happen at Muncie that the Members are not priveleged to. The subject of those closed door activities doesnt really matter for this question.

As President, would you do something to reduce the amount of AMA activity that is secreted away from the members?
Such as crating some kind of path for getting info autorized for release, other than just asking our DVP and hitting a Muncie closed door.

(I am asking on behalf of another RCU poster from another thread, but he had a good question for the candidates)

<edit: Memebers?? Maybe a few less E's and I'd get Members >

< Message edited by KidEpoxy -- 9/10/2007 4:31:50 PM >

STL-
you seem to have entirely missed the point that it was a candidate election Q&A forum,
not a Gripe At Dave's Current Position forum,
that you took that quote from. Notice how I dressed up & put on my church shoes to be polite to the candidate? Notice that it was a question on his future activities should he be elected... the kind of topic appropriate for a Candidate Forum? If I had just spilled this thread over to that forum it would (& I agree with having it) get deleted as inapropriate there.

But since you didnt get the good stuff in your copy&paste, look at the text in whole.
Recently 2 Closed Doors activities at Muncie have generated a lot of discussion here, and brought up the topic of having less happen at Muncie that the Members are not priveleged to. The subject of those closed door activities doesnt really matter for this question.
It is a question about his future activities on closed doors in general, and as such the past particular details of one instance or another dont really matter. "and brought up the topic of having less happen at Muncie that the Members are not priveleged to." Not a gripe that will continue to get the response from Muncie we are getting here, but a candidate question on changing the AMA if elected.

Such as crating some kind of path for getting info autorized for release, other than just asking our DVP and hitting a Muncie closed door.
Lookie there, a future creation for getting blacklined Fredom Information type De-Classified info
The Goverment can do it, why cant we. I dont want SteveK's ssn & telephone number, but if you go back to the first 5 or so pages of the thread I've been asking for a 7-10 word official explanation other than None Of Your Business. Create a path for the clean blacklined info.

That was the question to the CANDIDATE Dave in the CANDIDATE FORUM, If you really want to get Dave's view on this thread, just read his posts here.... uh... oh, he didnt post in this thread, wonder why? We had other DVP in here... whatever- Feel free to ask him specificly about the SK Firing yourself right here, it will put that Basin Thread to shame.


I got a quick & nice reply from DM from my nice question, somewhat supporting my desire for more Daylight activity from AMA (as DM called it). Without griping over a current problem I got him to say we could have more info, even though he CYA with a qualifier over info they cant release... and that qualifier was left open to include anything the AMA didnt feel like saying will be deemed unreleasable.

Go ahead & ask DM a gripe here and we will see how quick it brings DM in.

<edit>

quote:

If you don't ENJOY your membership benefits, quit, you threatened it, now do it.

I did, but I just jumped back in to vote for Hoss (seems some Resume Not Reading Commitee put an end to Hoss winning)
Dont worry, I will not be here long, and your "Happiness Surveys" of members will be right high since they dont count folks so disgusted they quit.

quote:

just answered a question you already knew the answer too, who didn't see that coming

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stickbuilder

50%

I have probably been flying more than anyone else that I know lately. How about you?

Bill

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy

Are you suggesting the AMA cant even get its act together enough to catch up the le level the goverment red tape is at?

quote:

Funny but weren't you the one looking for "general" policies? They both answered the question the exact same way, some information you'll get, some information you will not be getting. Funny but I see Rich as a hair more open then DM.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
It goes back 15 pages or so,
If the AMA sticks to the truth without trying to slam the guy, it aint Libel.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy


CAN, or HAVE TO?

quote:

ORIGINAL: STLPilot

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
It goes back 15 pages or so,
If the AMA sticks to the truth without trying to slam the guy, it aint Libel.

Right, they call it invasion of privacy and defamation of character. So which lawsuit would you prefer the AMA hold themselves out receive for passing you such invaluable information? Either one or both?

quote:

ORIGINAL: 50%plane

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlecrankshaf

quote:

ORIGINAL: STLPilot

quote:

ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
It goes back 15 pages or so,
If the AMA sticks to the truth without trying to slam the guy, it aint Libel.

Right, they call it invasion of privacy and defamation of character. So which lawsuit would you prefer the AMA hold themselves out receive for passing you such invaluable information? Either one or both?

What a bunch of BS. Where do you get this stuff? No need to actually give a twisted answer, ya know...

The AMA apparently made a decision not to elaborate at this time for reasons unknown to us at this time. That is all we know. Your conjecture is absolutely meaningless.


Once again, it seems likely SK was pressed to resign since JC felt he was insubordinate by disobeying a direct order. There may be other extenuating circumstances contributing to the event. What other reasons is not known to the entire membership…just a certain few may know and they may only know what has been told to them.

wow!

First off, do yourself a favor and pull your head out of your anus by googling "lawsuit, invasion of privacy" and "lawsuit, defamation of character"

Secondly, after you've done that, you will find some reasons written in the text that google turns up for you.

Third, what make you feel that you are entitled to knowing all the details of a situation that does not affect you in the slightest.(except give you something to rant and rave about)


Sincerely,
50%