MikeGreenshields
Posts: 168
Joined: 3/15/2005 From: Fountain Valley,
CA, USA Status: offline
|
Many electronic companies who make electronic accessories do not test their equipment's RF output to see if they meet FCC standards and/or if they create excessive RF in any of the active RC Frequencies world wide. 27, 35, 36, 40, 41, 72, and now 900 and 2.4... So, yes, 2.4GHz is just like any other radio. If overwhelming RF in the same frequency range is being emitted, you'll experience radio problems. It's that simple. In MANY cases, the electronic noise is in the 100MHz and below range, thus 2.4GHz would not be affected much or at all. Anyway, that's why a range test is important. Another thing I kinda' preach is a power-on range test. Engine/Motor RUNNING while the range test is made (so 1 range test power off and then the next power on). This is a GREAT way to ensure there is not a problem. There's another post about turning the model in different directions to ensure the antenna placement doesn't have any "dead" spots. It takes 2 people, but it's a pretty easy test. I re-posted it at my blog. mikegoesflying. wordpress. com (remove spaces). What we see is "most" electronic ignitions are no where near the 2.4GHz band. But there are a few electronic ignition with rf/harmonics that hit it. Anyway, "metalmetal67's" advice is sound! Be CAREFUL and a power-on range test is a GREAT way to ensure everything is ok. But indeed 2.4GHz "generally speaking" is WAY less apt to get interference from typical equipment used in R/C planes/cars/boats... Mike PS. Glad everyone likes the promo and THANKS for all the kind words about us.
_____________________________
Mike Greenshields Product Manager
|