Mode One
Posts: 2228
Joined: 5/4/2005 From: Park Rapids, MN, USA Status: offline
|
BobH, Sounds like something to do while watching your favorite TV show. Just spent some more time looking over the plans. I found the port and starboard wing panels to have a length difference of 3/16ths of an inch. Likely due to humidity or some such factor at the time of printing. This certyainly isn't a big deal. However, BUSA shows the incidence angles as 0 degree on the lower and 1.5 degrees positive on the upper. The only way I can get these angles close to those numbers, is if I use the flat bottom of the airfoil as the cord/incidence line. Using the actual cord line will produce angles of incidence about 2 degrees higher, or 2 dgrees positive in the lower and 3.5/4 degrees positive in the upper. I wonder if this is why people have felt the need to increase the stab incidence (I think this would actually be decreasing the stab/main plane decalage). I need to study the plans more, to determine if I should decrease wing incidence, or (more likey and the easier fix) increase stab incidence. I'm quite surprised that the designer(s) doesn't know where the cord line of an airfoil is located! Overall, I've found the plans dimensions to be fairly close to the Windsock Data File's 5 view drawing.
< Message edited by Mode One -- 11/4/2007 6:37:19 PM >
_____________________________
Mode One, AMA 59157
|