Center of Gravity "CG" Computations  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Tips & Techniques >> Center of Gravity "CG" Computations
Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/22/2007 5:27:36 PM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
I have not found a thread that specifically talks about balancing and CG computations

I thought I would start this thread to discuss easy ways to compute changes to a CG without it being a trial and error method. It can easily be done using mathmatics with perfect results.

You can compute exactly the weigh to add to a desired location and the CG will be exactly where it should.

Do you want to move your servos to the tail. You can compute what effect it would have and how to compensate before actually making the change.

Calculate where to place servos batteries, etc. to limit the amount of ballast weight needed.

Let's talk about those CG problems!



_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"
       Post #: 1

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/22/2007 7:37:57 PM   
KitBuilder



Posts: 250
Joined: 2/17/2007
From: Palm Harbor, FL, USA
Status: offline
I was reading an article the other day about just this from an older RCM issue... I will scan it and post it here after the holidays as I'm away from home.. In a nutshell. (if memory serves) it had to do with taking the distance from wheels to CG on the plans, put the nose of the craft on a scale... and correlating the distance calculation to weigth on the scale to be equal... The author said this was very very accurate and was the only way he balanced his planes. He stated the old "fingertip" method was very poor as fingers are wide and will affect balance point greatly.
Mike

_____________________________

Mike -
Kits are made to be bashed

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 2

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/22/2007 7:48:45 PM   
Bad_Daddy



Posts: 527
Joined: 1/27/2007
From: Tracy, CA, USA
Status: offline
Aircraft SuperCalculator = http://www.geistware.com/rcmodeling/cg_super_calc.htm
Conventional AC CG Calculator = http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg_calc.htm
Canard AC Calculator = http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg2_canard.htm
Engine Offset Calculator = http://www.lcrcc.net/offset_calc.htm

_____________________________

Just remember, if it was easy, everyone would be a TopGun pilot.
bad0daddy

(in reply to KitBuilder)
       Post #: 3

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/22/2007 10:06:09 PM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
Bad Daddy,

These references are great but probably a little complex for many modelers. If you work with the basics that most moderlers are used to, the same principles can be applied. As an example, a couple of years ago I bought a GeeBee Y 120. After I had it all together, I took an accurate weight of the aircraft. I then put it on the balancer, finding the balance point on the wing cord. When doing this I use the bubble level and made sure it was level and marked the balance point on the wing. For a warbird, I leave it a half bubble nose heavy.

I used the end of the prop shaft as the datum line. I then measured back to the marked balance point on the wing. Using the weight times the arm gave me the moment. The arm being the current CG. You then take another measurement to the desired arm (CG). You can then pick the best location for the ballast and compute how much weight it will take to move the CG to the desired location.

Once a current CG location is established you could then use the same process for locating servos, batteries, etc.

I look forward to hearing your points KitBuilder and your thoughts Bad Daddy.

Jim

< Message edited by RC Specialties -- 11/23/2007 12:23:54 AM >


_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to Bad_Daddy)
       Post #: 4

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/26/2007 5:44:57 AM   
themadmax


 

Posts: 92
Joined: 10/6/2004
From: Port Isabel, TX, USA
Status: offline
Jeez!...you guys make this sound so scientifically difficult! With the fuel tank empty, measure back from the leading edge 1/3rd the chord...that's your "safe" balance point. 1/4 chord, the safest. Most RC Aircraft are nose heavy, to begin with, and once you add 6-8 oz of fuel. or whatever, 3"- 4" forward of the CG, they just become more nose heavy. I've only seen one a/c in 30 years of flying that had a tail-heavy problem. A Nose-heavy condition only adds to the dynamic stability of the a/c while detracting from the instability that makes an a/c more aerobatic. The further aft you move the balance point, the better for aerobatics...to a point. Too far aft and a stall becomes irreversible

Those of you considering putting your servos at the tail, shouldn't. It increases the pitch stabaility. (Not good for aerobatics) and creates CG problems for what?...now you've got long servo leads, (GLITCH!@#), another connection to go bad...what was the good point, again?

If in doubt as to where stuff should go, build the airplane to a point where you can bolt on the wing and the engine. Then put the servos and battery such that your balance point is between 1/3 - 1/4 chord. The covering, cowl, wheels won't change things much and you can always move the battery out to the end of the engine mount, worst case lol

KISS, (Keep it simple ------!)

< Message edited by themadmax -- 11/26/2007 5:53:04 AM >

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 5

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/26/2007 8:08:12 PM   
scratchonly


 

Posts: 942
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: winnipeg, MB, CANADA
Status: offline

Remember that about 80% of the paint/covering is behind the CG.

_____________________________

Real planes have two wings and round engines

(in reply to themadmax)
       Post #: 6

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/26/2007 8:46:36 PM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
THEMADMAX,

I understand the simplicity aspect of your comments. There are those that want the CG to be exactly where it should. A well balanced plane flies its best. The point here is that once a known CG location is determined, you can determine the effects of any changes without putting the plane on and off the balancer a dozen times. Some models have the servos in the tail. It is easy to determine what changes are required with a calculator. Likewise, you can determine what will happen to your CG if you install a different engine. All without actually modifying the aircraft. Don't you agree it can be beneficial?

Jim

_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to themadmax)
       Post #: 7

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/27/2007 12:54:38 AM   
themadmax


 

Posts: 92
Joined: 10/6/2004
From: Port Isabel, TX, USA
Status: offline
Stick your fingers under the wing @ 1/3-1/4 chord, if it doesn't balance there, you've got to move something! Calculating sounds like math and I've never considered RC as something I want to do math in, except to figure how what my wing/power-loading is. I fly "real" airplanes so I know how to do weights and balances computations but one can't exactly jack a "real" plane up at the desired "finger point" to make sure it's not tail-heavy...with most RC aircraft, you can!

KISS

< Message edited by themadmax -- 11/27/2007 12:56:24 AM >

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 8

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/27/2007 1:32:26 AM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
In a real airplane you make sure you don't exceed your forward and aft CG, don't you? A model is not much different if you want optimum performance. Your method will work, but there is an alternative.

Jim

< Message edited by RC Specialties -- 11/27/2007 1:47:06 AM >


_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to themadmax)
       Post #: 9

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/27/2007 3:22:21 AM   
SoCalSal


 

Posts: 838
Joined: 3/5/2005
From: spring valley , CA, USA
Status: offline
If anybody is interested I have a excell spreed sheet all set up to figure out the correct CG of any aircrafte full scale or otherwise. Just drop me a note and I will forward it to you. You will need Microsoft excell to open it. But once you have the spreed sheet you can change any of the cells from metrics or pounds and ounces and it will work just the same. Simple to use and costs you nothing but about 20 minutes of your time and it can be used over and over. And the most important thing it is very very accurite.

_____________________________

Let''s be open minded.... But not so open that your brain falls out

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 10

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/27/2007 1:12:07 PM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
SoCalSal,

Thank you for the input. I am sure some will find it useful. I will send you a PM. I would like to take a look myself.

Jim

_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to SoCalSal)
       Post #: 11

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/28/2007 5:01:46 PM   
JRFisher


 

Posts: 88
Joined: 6/11/2003
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Status: offline
Are the ailerons included when measuring the wing chord?

_____________________________

I do crash research

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 12

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 11/28/2007 5:10:15 PM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
JR,

Yes, the ailerons are included if you are to measure the chord at their location.

Jim

< Message edited by RC Specialties -- 11/28/2007 5:18:47 PM >


_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to JRFisher)
       Post #: 13

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 12/10/2007 4:55:32 AM   
Mitsu1



Posts: 543
Joined: 11/5/2002
From: Dumas, AR, USA
Status: offline
I used somebody's online CG calculator when I built my most recent Katana, since I didn't have documentation from the designer on the proper CG.. The calculartor I used had blanks to plug in all relevant info, ( root chord, tip chord, span, sweep, etc.) ... and a blank to plug in what percentage point you wanted it balanced. I wanted a very aerobatic aircraft, and knowing the balance range is generally 25 - 33%, I plugged in 34%. I wanted it near tail heavy. I hit the "compute" buton, and it said that point twould be 6, 3/4" from leading edge at root. I proceeded to do a very tedious and tidy installation of batteries , etc that would give me a balance exactly at that 6, 3/4" position, only to find that that calculation was way off .. to the conservative. The plane was way, way nose heavy still. I had to trial and error my way through an additional 2" to get to what I assume was the true 33 -34% position. What's really strange is that I cross checked the numbers by using a second calculator, which didn't give the same point exactly, but within a 1/2" of it.

(in reply to RC Specialties)
       Post #: 14

RE: Center of Gravity "CG" Computations - 12/10/2007 11:36:02 AM   
RC Specialties


 

Posts: 262
Joined: 12/23/2006
From: Zachary, LA, USA
Status: offline
Mitsu1,

I have not used a calculator, so I can't comment. It makes it a tough when you don't know the CG point. The ranges you mentioned should be close depending on wing design. I have not worked with an unknown. Maybe others can comment.

Jim

_____________________________

RC Specialties, LLC "Home of the TurboHeader Muffler"

(in reply to Mitsu1)
       Post #: 15