RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/13/2007 5:24:21 PM   
AirplaneMan04


 

Posts: 183
Joined: 8/2/2004
From: Grain Valley, MO, USA
Status: offline
Andrew, in regard to your upcoming 90-100" line of warbirds, I have a request.
A P-47 Razorback would be great! That's my vote. Keep up the good work!

-airplaneman

(in reply to fockewulf37)
       Post #: 26

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/13/2007 5:57:30 PM   
Craig-RCU



Posts: 446
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: minneapolis, MN, USA
Status: offline
I think I can see the rounded top of the side doors and a door hinge just in front of the stars and bars on both sides of the model. Anyone else see it too? I don't see any indication of even a scribed in window though. A gloss black circle would simulate that nicely.

Part of the need for nose weight in models is that most models are over designed compared with their full scale counterparts. The full scale versions don't have to put up with ham-fisted giants picking them up and moving them around the airport or carrier deck. The only part of full scale planes built to take that kind of rough contact are the landing gear. You can lift and swing a model around by its tail surfaces with no worries that they are going to break off. You couldn't do that with a full scale plane.

Since you don't really need to be able to swing a model around by its tail surfaces, manufacturers of ARFs and kits might be able to ease up a bit on the over design of structures aft of the C.G at least. Case in point. I bought a World Models Zero 60 and checked out the threads here on RCU to find that people were needing to add 11 to 13 oz to the nose to get the plane to balance per instructions. I decided to put the arf on a diet aft of the C.G. The first thing I noticed was that the fiberglass fuse had a lot of ply structure in it aft of the wing. It was conspicuously more structure than the ply structure in my Great Planes G.B. R2, so I removed all of it but the longerons glued to the fiberglass. This amounted to a weight savings of about 4 oz aft of the C.G. and eliminated the need for any nose weight and a net weight savings of about a pound. Zeros are one of those types that typiclly need nose weight because of the short nose on them. Plus, it didn't weakening the tail enough that I can't still swing it around by its tail surfaces to my hearts content.

Andrew, can anything be done during the manufacturing process to lighten up the tail a bit especially on the models that need more noseweight than most?


Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to fockewulf37)
       Post #: 27

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/13/2007 6:01:49 PM   
Ram-bro


 

Posts: 1943
Joined: 1/22/2002
From: Bennington, NE, USA
Status: offline
71" wingspan and 54" length. Will the kit come with ordance?

(in reply to fockewulf37)
       Post #: 28

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/14/2007 12:12:27 AM   
bladerunner1955


 

Posts: 220
Joined: 2/21/2004
From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Status: offline
In regard to upcoming 90-100" line of warbirds? What is this about? More warbirds in the 90" to 100". Someone fill me in on this.

(in reply to AirplaneMan04)
       Post #: 29

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/14/2007 1:54:34 AM   
Peter_OZ



Posts: 4152
Joined: 6/5/2002
From: Brisbane, , AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
from the website

Length: 54"
Wingspan: 70.9"
Wing Area: 877 square inches
Wing Loading: 5.5kg, 12lbs.
Engine: 1.50 4-Cycle or 26CC gas.
Radio: 6 ch&9 servos.

(in reply to bladerunner1955)
       Post #: 30

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/17/2007 3:19:11 AM   
AKondor


 

Posts: 334
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: Thunder Bay, ON,
Status: offline
Thanks Peter... I was just about to copy and paste the specs tonight. Glad you beat me to it.

About other things.
Yes we are planning a 90-100 inch line of birds. Our focus is still to round off the 70 inch 1.20 - 1.50 ish line of WWII birds. We will definately let you know as soon as we have decided which will be the first of out subjects in this range. Please be patient with this upcoming series and keep your suggestions roling in. I assure you the planes will be incredibly detailed.

Lets keep this thread about the Skyraider for the time beeing.

I will be in China and flying the model personaly in January. I will post pics of my adventures as soon as I return. The Video should appear on the website soon after I get back.

_____________________________

Andrew Kondor
KMP Models

(in reply to Peter_OZ)
       Post #: 31

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/17/2007 11:18:49 AM   
Jimmy Bananas


 

Posts: 854
Joined: 12/30/2001
From: Urbandale, IA, USA
Status: offline
Andrew:

Am waiting for your "SBD Dauntless"..

(in reply to AKondor)
       Post #: 32

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/17/2007 4:42:16 PM   
kahloq



Posts: 1422
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Craig-RCU

The only part of full scale planes built to take that kind of rough contact are the landing gear. You can lift and swing a model around by its tail surfaces with no worries that they are going to break off. You couldn't do that with a full scale plane.

Since you don't really need to be able to swing a model around by its tail surfaces, manufacturers of ARFs and kits might be able to ease up a bit on the over design of structures aft of the C.G at least.



This is not true. Sorry Craig, but there are many, many videos showing ground crew man-handling the tails of full size planes to push them around..so yes you could do that.

Most KMP planes are not over designed in the tail areas. In fact, there is very little balsa or ply in the tails at all. Case in point is the ME-109E. The only ply back there was an internal block to mount the tail wheel to. There are no formers. Nothing.
For KMP planes at least, having to add nose weight is exactly scale as these planes are built closer to scale then any World Models or Great Planes(Top Flite is not included in this) arf out there. Real plane engines are heavy...period. In order to keep scale outlines, weight is needed in some form usually up front. Other manufacturers may build their planes to look kinda close to scale, but they cheat and do things to make them either fly easier, or balast without weight by shortening the tail section, or other no scale things.



(in reply to Craig-RCU)
       Post #: 33

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/18/2007 12:11:34 AM   
Jimmy Bananas


 

Posts: 854
Joined: 12/30/2001
From: Urbandale, IA, USA
Status: offline

tail wheel unit,still looks shi&%..just a piece of wire hanging out there..wonder if they can't improve on that aspect of the model...most of there models,it's the same doggone thing...everything on the model looks good,then you look at the tail wheel, and yuk...Of course KMP isn't the only one who does it..others do it also....just my 2 cents worth

(in reply to kahloq)
       Post #: 34

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/18/2007 4:00:54 AM   
AKondor


 

Posts: 334
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: Thunder Bay, ON,
Status: offline
I agree that the tail wheel assembly certainly can be made to reflect scale assemblies. We have some limitations though to what is available where we make the kits.

I can assure you that when we start making 90-100 inch aircraft we can make this area more scale like as well as afford to include better hardware in the assembly.

We will work on sourcing more scale type tail wheel assemblies for our 70 inch range of aircraft. We could put more expensive (also heavier) tail assemblies but it seems that the bulk of our customers are happy to put in their preferred assemblies or even convert to retractable tail assemblies.

Many of the planes need a good amount of nose weight already and we don't want to complicate things by adding too much more weight to the tail by adding more sophisticated tail gear.

Its hard to please everybody but we may be able to offer an option in the near future.

Cheers,

_____________________________

Andrew Kondor
KMP Models

(in reply to Jimmy Bananas)
       Post #: 35

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/18/2007 4:16:59 AM   
Ram-bro


 

Posts: 1943
Joined: 1/22/2002
From: Bennington, NE, USA
Status: offline
Akondor, just keep doing what your doing. Arf guys gotta learn to do somethings themselves....if just to have some pride in ownership. I like what your doing ....making it hard for the builders in the hobby to stay true and focused.

(in reply to AKondor)
       Post #: 36

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/18/2007 4:30:17 AM   
MANFRED



Posts: 731
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: san diego, CA, USA
Status: offline
Yeah, everybody wants a scalemasters true to scale ship on a beer budget. Keep them light and strong and flyable and let us worry about the extra crap we'll throw on them.

_____________________________

Life is too short to fly ugly planes!

(in reply to Ram-bro)
       Post #: 37

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/19/2007 5:41:38 AM   
AKondor


 

Posts: 334
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: Thunder Bay, ON,
Status: offline
You guys rock! Thanks for the positive feedback.



_____________________________

Andrew Kondor
KMP Models

(in reply to MANFRED)
       Post #: 38

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/19/2007 2:36:15 PM   
BBOwen


 

Posts: 847
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Alexander City, AL, USA
Status: offline
AKondor, you guys make beautiful birds. When making scale warbirds you have to stop at some point before it get rediculous. I would rather have a plane that is not at perfect 100% scale but flies well without any bad tendencies. Also some good QC goes a long way! Making sure all the parts are there, that they all fit and the manual is up to date, 3 snags I ran into with my JU-87.


_____________________________

BBOwen
CORSAIR Brotherhood Lucky #13

(in reply to AKondor)
       Post #: 39

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/20/2007 5:28:52 AM   
AKondor


 

Posts: 334
Joined: 10/11/2002
From: Thunder Bay, ON,
Status: offline
HI:

We're working on the manual for sure. We have somebody that does our EAM manuals from Detroit. You can take a look at them on our website and compare them to our warbird manuals. Let me know what you think.

We are constantly working with the factory to makeure the QC is a priority. They are very good at sending us anything we need to replace a product for our customers if something rears its ugly head.

I'll pass on the feedback to our factory once again. I will be there in 2 weeks and I will tell them to read the thread here as well.

_____________________________

Andrew Kondor
KMP Models

(in reply to BBOwen)
       Post #: 40

RE: KMP NEW A1 Skyraider - pics - 12/23/2007 8:31:55 PM   
kochj



Posts: 1352
Joined: 12/5/2005
From: Victoria, MN, USA
Status: offline
I just watched a movie about a month ago that had a sky raider in it..... I was enjoying the cool plane fly around droping bombs on
VC when he got shot down!!! The rest of the movie was about how he became a prisioner of war.... Christian Bale was starring.... can't remember the movies name though... It was a failry recent release........

The highlight of the movie was the begining when they were flying the skyraider! The rest of it sucked!!!

I emediatly thought of Adam and when KMP was going to release this cool, kind of ugly plane!!!
It is funny how a movie can make you have interest in something when you didn't have much interest in before!....
Kind of like when (RIsky business) the movie, came out and those funny reflective glasses that Tom Cruise were sold out every.where!!!

Anyway.... I like the plane now....

Justin


_____________________________

Winning isn''t everything, it''s all there is.

(in reply to AKondor)