can someone recognize this aircraft  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> Full Scale planes, cars, helis, boats >> Airplanes - Full Scale >> can someone recognize this aircraft
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/16/2007 7:41:15 AM   
Ragz



Posts: 1661
Joined: 12/6/2001
From: Nagpur, INDIA
Status: offline
I saw this aircraft this morning at the local airport. Wondering what it is.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

Anurag
       Post #: 1

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/16/2007 7:49:20 AM   
Rotorwrench



Posts: 50
Joined: 11/4/2003
From: Abbeville, LA, USA
Status: offline
Looks like a Long EZ. A composite aircraft developed by Burt Rutan. Also from http://www.velocityaircraft.com/airabout.html

(in reply to Ragz)
       Post #: 2

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/16/2007 9:04:50 AM   
Ragz



Posts: 1661
Joined: 12/6/2001
From: Nagpur, INDIA
Status: offline
if so, wonder whats it doing in central India

_____________________________

Anurag

(in reply to Rotorwrench)
       Post #: 3

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/16/2007 5:36:24 PM   
seemefly_1



Posts: 484
Joined: 9/4/2007
From: Marrietta, GA, USA
Status: offline
i would be wondering where the nose wheel is

_____________________________

soloed november 17, 2007 at 4:50pm eastern time

(in reply to Ragz)
       Post #: 4

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/16/2007 6:49:02 PM   
slick95


 

Posts: 203
Joined: 11/14/2004
From: georgetown, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

i would be wondering where the nose wheel is


You have to retract the nose wheel to get in and out.

SLICK

(in reply to seemefly_1)
       Post #: 5

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/17/2007 5:33:08 AM   
Lowlevlflyer


 

Posts: 895
Joined: 5/29/2004
From: Davis, OK, USA
Status: offline
It's a Vari EZ or a Long EZ, cant tell for certain which one. Also, with the three blade prop, it COULD be a Berkut, which is basically just a modified, higher performance version of the Long EZ. I always loved these aircraft, they are REAL performers if they're built right.

< Message edited by Lowlevlflyer -- 12/17/2007 5:35:23 AM >


_____________________________

AMA# 770153
"Hey ya'll, watch this..."

(in reply to slick95)
       Post #: 6

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/17/2007 5:35:31 AM   
Ragz



Posts: 1661
Joined: 12/6/2001
From: Nagpur, INDIA
Status: offline
Why would they retract the nose wheel like this? Even if its for repair, shouldnt it be supported correctly with something underneath the nose?

_____________________________

Anurag

(in reply to Lowlevlflyer)
       Post #: 7

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/17/2007 2:46:48 PM   
Taildragger726



Posts: 757
Joined: 1/28/2004
From: N Ft Myers, FL, USA
Status: offline
I think the EZ aircraft have a tendency to tip back on the main gear without the pilot/passenger installed as ballast. It is standard operating procedure to rest on their nose and provisions are in order for resting in that state. To enter the aircraft,the pilot firsts lifts the nose and extends the nose gear. Being careful not to let the aircraft tip back onto the rudders or propeller, then hops in.

_____________________________

Also known as N726AC

(in reply to Ragz)
       Post #: 8

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/17/2007 7:40:55 PM   
Chad Veich



Posts: 2736
Joined: 12/13/2001
From: Litchfield Park, AZ, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ragz

Why would they retract the nose wheel like this? Even if its for repair, shouldnt it be supported correctly with something underneath the nose?


Standard operating procedure when nobody is in the cockpit.





(in reply to Ragz)
       Post #: 9

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/18/2007 12:49:32 AM   
seanpcola



Posts: 71
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: Pensacola, FL, USA
Status: offline
I and a friend built a Long-Eze, starting in 1981 and finished around 1989. The nose down parking served several purposes. Mainly, as mentioned is the tendency to fall back without pilot weight. Also it may help while tied down, resisting wind gusts. It is also retracted in the air for drag purposes. Rutan felt that a retractable nose gear was worth the effort as a drag penalty but the mains would add to much complexity and weight to the design and was therefore deemed not worth the additional effort. During building the bottom of the nose at the ground contact point is fitted with a metal and/or rubber shoe as a sort of sacrificial piece to take the scrapes when lowered. As a side note there have been a few cases of pilots either forgetting to lower the nose gear or the gear not locking completlely and as the aircraft slowed on rollout the nose gently dropped onto the shoe acting as a pretty effective brake with no damage to the airframe. Forgetting something. I'll edit later if my old feeble mind remembers.

_____________________________

Sean

(in reply to Chad Veich)
       Post #: 10

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/18/2007 7:05:14 AM   
Ragz



Posts: 1661
Joined: 12/6/2001
From: Nagpur, INDIA
Status: offline
thanks for the explanation.

_____________________________

Anurag

(in reply to seanpcola)
       Post #: 11

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/18/2007 11:34:00 AM   
spider007


 

Posts: 10
Joined: 8/17/2006
From: , ON, CANADA
Status: offline
canard builders forums
http://www.canardzone.com/forum/index.php
http://www.canardcommunity.com/

(in reply to Ragz)
       Post #: 12

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/24/2007 5:01:58 PM   
Tbone4life



Posts: 138
Joined: 2/17/2006
From: pearland, TX, USA
Status: offline
Did John Denver own 1 of these?

_____________________________

Club Saito #540

(in reply to spider007)
       Post #: 13

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/27/2007 5:28:21 PM   
johnm15141



Posts: 12
Joined: 7/21/2007
From: Fairfield, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tbone4life

Did John Denver own 1 of these?


No he was "owned" by one of these!

http://www.airsafe.com/events/celebs/denver.htm

(in reply to Tbone4life)
       Post #: 14

RE: can someone recognize this aircraft - 12/27/2007 5:56:24 PM   
Gravityisnotmyfriend



Posts: 848
Joined: 3/1/2004
From: Greenville, WI, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: seanpcola

I and a friend built a Long-Eze, starting in 1981 and finished around 1989. The nose down parking served several purposes. Mainly, as mentioned is the tendency to fall back without pilot weight. Also it may help while tied down, resisting wind gusts. It is also retracted in the air for drag purposes. Rutan felt that a retractable nose gear was worth the effort as a drag penalty but the mains would add to much complexity and weight to the design and was therefore deemed not worth the additional effort. During building the bottom of the nose at the ground contact point is fitted with a metal and/or rubber shoe as a sort of sacrificial piece to take the scrapes when lowered. As a side note there have been a few cases of pilots either forgetting to lower the nose gear or the gear not locking completlely and as the aircraft slowed on rollout the nose gently dropped onto the shoe acting as a pretty effective brake with no damage to the airframe. Forgetting something. I'll edit later if my old feeble mind remembers.



That exact thing happened a few years ago at my local airport. I witnessed a long eze make a beatufil landing on the mains - but I noticed the nose gear was not down. After the plane skidded to a stop, the pilot got out, extended the nose gear and took off. The plane (apart from some scuffed up paint) was undamaged. Apparently he didn't want to come in and get ridiculed for his mistake - I can't blame him.

_____________________________

The mathematician sees the glass as twice as big as it needs to be. The engineer sees it as full with a Safety Factor of 2.

(in reply to seanpcola)