RE: The AMA Magazine ?????????????  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       


BVM Bobcat - RTF
Seller:  Gordito Volador
Details:   $4,750.00   |  10/2/2008   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: The AMA Magazine ?????????????
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

[Poll]

The AMA Magazine ?????????????


You enjoy recieveing the mag every month?
  85% (126)
You don't enjoy it?
  14% (21)


Total Votes : 147


(last vote on : 3/3/2008 1:05:18 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 2:30:39 AM   
KidEpoxy



Posts: 3382
Joined: 10/14/2004
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
Rubber-
Check this thread for a few different accountings of the cost of MA
Question: Model Aviation / Dues
it has some number crunching by a few folks (including me), and is not that long a read,
gets pretty direct around post #43 or so

< Message edited by KidEpoxy -- 1/8/2008 2:39:54 AM >


_____________________________

Optional MA is part of AMA history, we can go optional AGAIN if we just say so

(in reply to Rubbernecker)
       Post #: 26

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 2:02:31 PM   
STLPilot


 

Posts: 9179
Joined: 3/12/2003
From: Manhattan, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

Rubbernecker
I don't have the facts to back what I am saying, but I find it hard to believe that they could print and ship to my door MA for $.75 an issue. That is why I said, if they reduced the price a reasonable amount, many people wouldn't get it. Years ago, membership use to be offered without the magazine but it only reduced your dues by $5 - $10. To answer your question, no I wouldn't get it if it only cost me $.75 an issue. I thumb through it and chuck it in the recycle can. I do occasionally give them to the local kids that want them. I think the members ought to get a reasonable choice and A.M.A could reduce some of it's costs by not making so many copies. Again, just my $.02.


quote:

Kidepoxy
it has some number crunching by a few folks (including me), and is not that long a read,
Don't forget DM who did some number crunching as well and came up with less then .75 per copy shipped.

The reason that MA is no longer optional is the reason Dave Mathewson explained it, it took many years for the AMA to get MA at the price point to where it is now, thanks to growth. He specifically stated that it's no longer viable to make the magazine optional due to the low price. If they made the magazine optional, it would only increase it's per copy costs, like it did before.

So you're right, for less then .75 per copy there aren't a lot, especially most members that are going to opt out of the magazine, but there would be some. But like you said, give it to a kid and it will make that copy worth a whole lot more then .75. In the old days, that would be less then a cup of coffee, but now it's about 1/3 of a cup of coffee.

_____________________________

Here At The Wall

(in reply to KidEpoxy)
       Post #: 27

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 5:28:42 PM   
KidEpoxy



Posts: 3382
Joined: 10/14/2004
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
See what happens when I try to start a new year,
I take STL off ignore and right away its off to the races.

Lets see, what does STL say it costs.... well, lets review:

quote:

STL 11/25/07:
Like I said, MA costs each member between $6-7 per year, that's 12 issues shipped to the door. These are the hard numbers, balance sheets don't lie, however RCU forum members dilute the truth. I take no credit other then reading the 2006 financial report for my comments.

quote:

STL 12/1/07:
Hey Kid check out post #24 and see where I got $6.66 a copy. Dave Mathewson is a bright guy as demonstrated in this thread. He also handles himself very professionally

quote:

STL 12/1/07:
Once again, Dave Mathewson is correct in his math and most especially, his logic. MA's net cost is divisible by the entire MEMBERSHIP, not magazines shipped. But at the very least you've discovered each member is not paying $18, that's a relief. You should take a few books out on them pizza deliveries. (I know what you really do, do.)


wow, he sure puts stock in the numbers DM gave... I really like the way he cites the 2006Financial report... appears very credible... but what did DM say and what are the Financial Report numbers? I'll blue up the numbers DaveM has in his post

quote:

Kid Epoxy: 12/2/07 to Hoss
As to you quoting STL about DM calculating the 'subscription cost'
did you do that to show where DM used ball park numbers to get a ballpark answer? Nothing wrong with that, DM made it clear the figures were his estimates so I'm not gonna pick on him for that. Or did you put that reference to DM Post#24 to show the method/formula DM used to get that number? How DM clearly stated he was using 155k as the member number because he was deducting the Youth & Family ( the No-Magazine Folks), just as I used the 2005 No-Magazine number.

quote:

DM (The Cheif) Post#24:
Assuming the audit report paints an accurate picture of the magazine operation, in round numbers, it appears as an expense of roughly $1,000.000. Divide the million by, say 155,000 (figuring that not all youth memberships or 2nd family members receive the magazine) and that works out to about $6.45. So the question becomes could we create a black & white "newsletter" including paper, ink, printing, postage and the labor to put it all together for .54 per copy? I don't know.


so, If Hoss doesnt mind me getting a quick review in for the masses playing along at home,
DM used $1mil loss / 155k ( excluded the no-mag folks) = $6.45 estimate
KE used 2005 1.132mil loss / 132k (2005 MA avg subs sent : like DM excluding no-mag folks) = $8.57
...... If folks would like to complain about DMs formula for calculating the averaged cost to member, then they should complain to DM about it & not me for using DMs formula with 2005 non-estimate numbers.


Uh-oh, Holy Cited Sources Batman!! Look at the real numbers under the VERBATIM estimate from DM.
But wait, lest see how I could be wrong, Spin it maestro-

quote:

STL 12/2/07
However Dave's math was off, but so was yours. He ballparked 1.0MM against 1.132MM. 1.132MM against 155k MEMBERS, works out to $7.30 per MEMBER cost, which is what he used in his analysis, which you are obviously comparing your analysis too. If the AMA moved to a independent for profit entity for MA, say BYE BYE to that number, even at $8


So, what does STL say the magazine costs now? 75cents a issue ($9.00)?
Seems that is neither his 11/25 guess of $6-7 from him reading AMA financial reposts,
nor is that the STL 12/1 $6.66 citation of DM post24 (DM estimated 6.45 in post),
despite STL declaring 12/1 how accurate DM was in math & in formula (like stl & the financial reports?),
Nor is STL's current 75cents accurate to my posting of the real numbers that give $8.57 (71cents)
nor is it is it STL's $7.30 (61cent) admission that DM was way off in $ and formula.

Yet each time he will assure you he is right.
Kinda like now.
Lets ask how he went from December $7.30 to $9 (75cent)
Any guesses as to what new cost STL will declare as fact in March?


How much does it cost? Using the numbers from Aug & Nov 2006 MA
2005 MA Direct Cost $2186k
2005 Average MA subs copies sent: 131.6k

but it had revenue to offset some ot the cost
2005 MA Advertizing $992k
2005 MA Subscribtions $62k
How MA did in 2005 : $1132k LOSS for 131.6k avg magazines made

and no matter what folks tell you,
AMA is not collecting $8 to subsidize MA from the kids that pay only $1 a year. You cant make an $8 deposit from a $1 check.

<edit>
Know what, life is just better with folks on the ignore list.
I'm gonna go get a 79cent 20oz coffe & give STL the Lil Red Hand again.
I'll give him another shot in 2009


< Message edited by KidEpoxy -- 1/8/2008 5:31:40 PM >


_____________________________

Optional MA is part of AMA history, we can go optional AGAIN if we just say so

(in reply to Rubbernecker)
       Post #: 28

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 6:11:45 PM   
STLPilot


 

Posts: 9179
Joined: 3/12/2003
From: Manhattan, NY, USA
Status: offline
I'm sorry to make you have to do all that work KE, but I put it at "below .75" for simple clarification to the person who was wondering.

Fact of the matter, it's still below .75 on everyone's account.

Wish you would keep your red hand turned on! That would be useful.

_____________________________

Here At The Wall

(in reply to KidEpoxy)
       Post #: 29

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 6:13:55 PM   
abel_pranger


 

Posts: 2309
Joined: 5/7/2003
From: St Augustine, FL,
Status: offline
Thanks for pointing that out, KE. It is something I should have taken into account in in deciding my position on whether the Park Pilot is something worthy of my support, or not.
If the cost per issue of MA and the quarterly park pilot pub is similar, the regular AMA members receive 6 bucks more in benefits than the parkies. I used the $.75 per issue figure, may to change after digging more into your in-depth analysis. I hope the following is related closely enough to the topic that it doesn't just get zapped out of hand. If a discussion ensues, I'll start a new thread to move it to.
The average Joe sport flyer AMA member does not participate in AMA sanctioned events (I think less than 10% do, will welcome any correction on that). The average AMA member doesn't use that benefit, and so seems the guy to compare to the PPP member that is not afforded that membership benefit.
Both get the primary benefit offered by AMA, the $2.5 million liability coverage for site owners that is needed by clubs to obtain flying sites. I will presume until a real figure is cited that club charters for parkies will cost the same as for regular members, and be subsidized by individual memberships to the same extent.
So, besides $6 more worth of magazines what do regular sport flyer members get from AMA that parkies don't? We get to fly bigger airplanes, but I don't see any added cost to AMA for providing that 'additional benefit.' If it doesn't cost any more for AMA to have members with 55 lb 200 mph models than for my 5 lb 60 mph models, it doesn't appear that AMA's cost to support my activity would be any less if I were limited to 2 lb models.
The PPP is looking like a lot better deal than regular AMA membership. Seems like it could (should?) be extended to a "sport flyer" membership at essentially no additional cost, but at a significantly more attractive price.

Edit: I read in another forum (HERE if you want to see it) That regular AMA members can get the Park Pilot magazine for $9.95. Perhaps the difference in cost of benefits AMA provides to PPs and regular sport flyer members is even less than I estimated above.

Abel

< Message edited by abel_pranger -- 1/8/2008 8:08:33 PM >

(in reply to KidEpoxy)
       Post #: 30

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 9:08:31 PM   
Jim Thomerson



Posts: 2822
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Austin, TX, USA
Status: offline
I at one time would have agreed with KidEpoxy and supported an optional MA. However, I have become more mature. and I now do not understand how anyone could hold KidEpoxy's position. My AMA dues are $24 a year, less than I pay for Flying Models, or Control Line World, and less than half what membership in PAMPA costs. I should charge for my secrets as to how to go so cheap, but I will tell you for free. (1) become a CD and CD a contest. That cuts your dues in half. (2) Grow old. That gives you, at the moment, a senior rate. I suspect # 2 will go away as we all age together.

(in reply to abel_pranger)
       Post #: 31

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/8/2008 10:25:29 PM   
kid chuckles


 

Posts: 768
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Granbury, TX, USA
Status: offline
Did any of you read the no bickering part of the first post. Who cares what it costs or what it don't cost? The only thing you need to do is vote yes i like it or no i don't. NO BICKERING.
AT LEAST ON THIS ONE POST LOL.

(in reply to Jim Thomerson)
       Post #: 32

RE: The AMA Magazine ????????????? - 1/9/2008 4:37:31 AM   
KidEpoxy



Posts: 3382
Joined: 10/14/2004
From: San Antonio, TX, USA
Status: offline
KC-
ok, yeah, you are right.
I'm gonna step back from my desire to chat to whatever degree with JimT... we have other threads we could take it up in if we really wanted to

_____________________________

Optional MA is part of AMA history, we can go optional AGAIN if we just say so

(in reply to kid chuckles)
       Post #: 33

Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> RE: The AMA Magazine ?????????????
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]





Jump to:


Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Member Video Posts | RCU Video Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up