RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Part 2)  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: ditto
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Electric Aircraft Universe >> Foamies! - RC Electric Foam Aircraft >> RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Part 2)
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/11/2008 7:28:13 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline
Here's my input:

First, I didn't "grow frustrated" with the Stryker and decide to build this bird. They are apples and oranges and both have their place. My Bullet Proof Stryker thread is the result of the love for that plane, finding the the best ways to mod it for both strength and ease of use in the field, etc.

Secondly, what attracted me to the So plane wasn't how it might fly, but rather it's looks. I thought it looked like a tough little tank in the air, much along the lines of something like the wart hog. What also sucked me in was this plane seemed obscure to most of the RC community. I don't like following trends or building what everybody else has. Even when I do build somebody else's plane I try to modify it to my likes, building skills, and desired traits. I also have a thing for dual boomers and pushers which sucked me in more. Finally, I'm not a big fan of flat foam profile planes. I prefer EPS and having meat to the plane that I can hide electronics and such in.
The fact that this plane also performs like no other I've flown and handles low speed (as well as high) like a champ and is very stabile was just icing on the cake for me.

Do I think it's a very durable, cheap, and easy plane for a beginner to fly? Sure, I'd say it is. Not just because it will repair easy and is a good learning tool on building scratch built planes, but because it's fairly doscile in the air if you want it to be. The large h-stab and dual v-stabs gives it very good "traction" at slow speeds, etc.

Are there beginner aileron platforms out there? Sure, they may not call them beginner planes but some will fly really easy and are suitable for a newbie IMHO. Is the Stryker a newbie plane? I'd say yes. Not because it's necessarily the easiest plane to learn to fly (in some ways it is and in some not), but because it's durable, simply, and will glue back together numerous times while you earn your wings.

Should a rudder be learned before or after ailerons? I would guess that depends on what path you take. To me it was easier to learn ailerons and then rudder. Having that rudder on the throttle and left "dumb" thumb takes some practice without accidently shutting the motor off at the worst moment in time. I took my first step into RC with an Aerobird Challenger. VERY durable plane if modded right with some easy and quick things, mainly zip ties in the right spots. Maybe it's because I learned on one but I'm pretty fond of V-tails myself. They do handle different then rudder/elevator or elevator/aileron, but if you learn their unique traits you can do some pretty cool stuff with them. I think much of the criticism that V-tails get are from people who learned other controls first and then tried to apply those characteristics to the V-tail. You can't. Each control setup has it's own "feel" and disadvantages as well as advantages.

This reminds me of one guy I remember hearing say that the 27B was dull to fly because it wasn't an over powered brushless plane. I think this is looking at it the wrong way. The challenge isn't always going as fast possible, but pushing the limits of a the plane you are flying at the moment. Sure, the 27B is underpowered and can stall if you don't treat it right, but THAT'S the fun part...Trying to avoid that stall while pushing the limits with a particular stunt, or finding a way out of the stall without the torque of a brushless motor. I used to fly my Challenger and Extreme inverted a lot. Not because they were good at it, but because people said that couldn't be done on a V-tail with dihedral. The fact that it was hard to hold them there and proving somebody wrong was what was fun to me.

All I have to say for now until I read over more of the above messages, but that pretty much sums it up for me.

LlamaFragments, great job on the 3D drawing!




_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to critterhunter)
       Post #: 76

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/12/2008 5:19:19 AM   
LlamaFragments



Posts: 29
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: San Francisco, CA, USA
Status: offline
Well, I set up my motor and reciever, got the propsaver mounted. I tried spinning it up, but I found a few problems...
With the TowerPro BP-21T has anyone have trouble with:
1. The shaft wobbling slightly
2. The mount and the bottom of the motor getting really hot when run for ~45 seconds

I have a 36a speed control (on accident) and a 11.1v 2250mAh 20c li-po. Are those good for this motor or did I go wrong somewhere?

(in reply to critterhunter)
       Post #: 77

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/12/2008 10:01:37 PM   
Fisher



Posts: 601
Joined: 9/21/2004
From: Fort Richardson, AK, USA
Status: offline
I have not been on here in a while. Looks like a bit of spirited discussion has been going on. I too have been looking for that perfect beginner plane. Inexpensive, easy to build and repair, easy to modify, wide flight envelope, good looks etc and relatively easy to fly. The SO fits many of these attributes to a T.

What I do know is that there are some characteristics that hold true for all beginner planes.

1. Speed kills (but it is nice to have when you are ready for it). - use a small bushed motor or go very easy on the throttle.
2. A poorly trimmed plane of any sort is not what a beginner should be starting with. - make sure you trim the plane before a beginner starts flying.
3. Wind is your enemy. -Avoid flying in any wind until you have a feel for true flight behavior.
4. Give yourself plenty of room (vertically and horizontally).
5. If you are not having fun you are doing something wrong.

If I were going to market the SO as an RTF it would take some real thought as to how to break it down for packaging without requiring a lot of assembly. In my mind that is what is stopping folks from marketing this type of design. Though there are some P-38s out there.

I did come across a thread discussing the use of a Stryker body with minimal electronics and motor to provide a very slow flying A/E controlled plane. The results seemed very good. It was as much a powered glider than anything else. With a very light weight Stryker build (the opposite of the Bullet Proof version) you have a slow flying aileron plane that can be used as a trainer. Same goes for the SO. Both air frames have good glide ratios. For a beginner though an $18 air frame may be easier to handle than building a SO from scratch.

Llama,

I just down loaded the Google Sketchup Model. Well done. I think more people should be working with this powerful and free program.

I will shut up now.

Cheers,



< Message edited by Fisher -- 3/12/2008 10:10:06 PM >

(in reply to Swift427)
       Post #: 78

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/13/2008 12:26:45 AM   
layback2


 

Posts: 495
Joined: 2/27/2005
From: burneyville, OK, USA
Status: offline
i am thinking of building one and useing shafts from a BOW for the booms light weight and can run the control rods in them for the elevator and rudder great build ideas thanks

(in reply to critterhunter)
       Post #: 79

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/13/2008 6:57:55 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline
Not enough time to read/reply at the moment, but wanted to remark on something else that I forgot in my prior message. From what I've seen and heard, the Freedom and Swift are not very good planes. Numerous problems with both of them, at least early on when I was keeping tabs on how they compared to the Challenger. Haven't read or researched them lately so that may have changed.

Like I said, I cut my teeth in RC on the Challenger, as did four or five other friends I fly with. One day I showed up at my friend's farm and another friend was flying this incredible looking plane with streamers trailing behind it. I was shocked that RC had come so far, being both cheap and now electric. I did know that electric RC stuff existing in the past, but I didn't know the performance and flight times where that good now...and that was with nimh packs and brushed motors! Luckily I got into RC at just the right time, when not only prices were falling at an incredible rate, but performance as also going through the roof with lipos and brushless motors. I got to see that transition and am happy I did.

The Challenger is one tough little bugger provided you do a few simple mods to it that take a matter of minutes. It'll survive the worst of crashes over and over and still come back for more. I think learning on a V-tail was a blessing because it along with the dehidral limits (somewhat) the amount of over mobbing the controls newbies tend to do when learning. The plane can "auto pilot" and correct it's self by just letting go of the controls (I'm not talking about the "ACT" junk they put in the Freedom, but rather the dihedral...etc). Having the up/down/left/right on the "smart" thumb and one stick, while the throttle was on another slider switch, made the learning curve a lot easier. The mixed flying modes also helped walk me along into RC. The fact that the parts were cheap and on almost any hobby store's shelf for Parkzone/Hobbyzone planes also made it fast and easy to repair the thing and get back into the air.

Later, when I took up flying the Stryker, I also had my share of crashes. This gave me the first taste of aileron's to a large extent and that was a different learning curve. This plane wouldn't self correct but rather acting like it was on rails and went exactly where you put it, staying there until you put it somewhere else. Again, a very tough plane with readily available cheap parts on any store shelf, but it's added bonus was the fact that it glued together so easily crash after crash. For that reason I would consider it a good learner plane, or at least the second step in a learner plane as it was for me.

But, a long way to get to your boiled down question...Aileron/Elevator versus Rudder/Elevator as a trainer? As I said before, I think there is more than one way to skin a cat, or walk down the road of RC, and so depending on what you start out with or want to do the answer to that can change. Knowing what I know now, I'd say that an aileron/elevator plane would be in some respects just as easy or even easier to learn on if it was configured right...IE: dihedral. The So 11 would be a first class choice, not just because of it's cheap and simple build/repair design, but also because the plane gives you a great "feel and feedback" to what it's doing. It's got more "traction" and "acts" more like you think it should act with response to various control inputs, if you know what I'm trying to say. The single aileron configuration also would help to buffer the over mobbing of the sticks that is typical of new pilots as said above.

Having rudder on a plane? I've only recently started adding rudder to my planes (within the past year or so) and am still hardly using it. Not that I don't want to, but I often forget I have it to play with. That's no lie. For instance, with the second maiden of So #4 I flew it without ever thinking about the rudders until I had already landed. Rudders are great but I think they get in the way of learning an aileron/elevator plane. It's better not to even have it on the plane until later when you have the other controls down well.



_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to critterhunter)
       Post #: 80

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/13/2008 9:51:26 PM   
Swift427



Posts: 482
Joined: 3/15/2007
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Status: offline
The two replies by critter and one by fisher are VERY MUCH appreciated.

THANKS AGAIN !

< Message edited by Swift427 -- 3/15/2008 2:11:16 AM >


_____________________________

Never Give Up, Never Slow Down, Never Grow Old, and Never Ever Die Young

(in reply to critterhunter)
       Post #: 81

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/14/2008 6:42:42 AM   
layback2


 

Posts: 495
Joined: 2/27/2005
From: burneyville, OK, USA
Status: offline
I want to see pics on what everyone is doing that will give others a better veiw on there own changes or build ideas for this and other planes made from foam.I like the idea of building a great plane and not costing you a arm and leg i was just wondering about useing different booms that would not cost a lot but round i quess it does not matter i even like the V tail idea for the same plane.I seen a camera plane made something like this but had large foam wings twin booms made from carbon arrows that are hollow and he placed his control rods inside the arrow to the elevator thanks for a great topic everyone

(in reply to Swift427)
       Post #: 82

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/14/2008 7:54:17 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LlamaFragments

Well, I set up my motor and reciever, got the propsaver mounted. I tried spinning it up, but I found a few problems...
With the TowerPro BP-21T has anyone have trouble with:
1. The shaft wobbling slightly
2. The mount and the bottom of the motor getting really hot when run for ~45 seconds

I have a 36a speed control (on accident) and a 11.1v 2250mAh 20c li-po. Are those good for this motor or did I go wrong somewhere?


First, the 36 amp ESC and 2250ma 20 C (It is a 3 cell, right?) lipo are perfect for this motor. More amp ability than you need but it's always better to have more to keep the ESC and lipo cool(er). I normaly run 30 amp ESCs in all my park flyers, even if the motor is only drawing 12 or 14 amps. A 30 amp Tower Pro ESC from Hobby City is so cheap at $14 that it doesn't make any sense to shoot for a 20 or 25 amp ESC, and the weight difference won't really be much of anything. The only time I'd opt for say a 14 or less amp ESC is if I was building a park flyer on the real small end of size, like a plane that is small and light enough to fly in the front yard, indoors, etc. Even then I've seen people run much larger speed controls than they needed at the cost of some weight.

The lipo at 2250 3 cell (series) 20C is what is most comonly bought and used in most park flyers these days. It offers a lot of amp ability if you need it (45 amps, though it's never good to pull more than about 80% of amp ability to keep it easy on the pack). Sure, you could run a smaller pack, say in the 1000 to 1800 amp capacity range roughly, on this plane if you wanted, but the savings in weight would make it harder to balance the plane and would cut your flying time down. 2250 sized packs are the most universal to use in probably 75% of all park flyers. It's big enough to power a big plane (approaching sizes that wouldn't be considered park flyer anymore), yet small enough to use on park flyers that would be considered smaller than average...approaching the front yard sized planes. I'm using these packs to power my first EDF scratch builds real soon. Most EDF people tend to go 4 cell or more, yet I researched and found that the Hobby City 2.5 and 2.68" EDFs on a 3 cell and a 3900 k/v motor will put out some pretty amazing thrust numbers (23 to 25 ounces or so), while still keeping the amps well south of 40. These builds will be posted here when I start on them.

Remember this: A load (motor, light bulb, your TV, whatever) will only draw what it needs. What this means is that it doesn't matter if your battery is the size of a pack of smokes or the size of a garage, it can not cause the load (your motor) to draw more amps than it needs or wants and thus cook it. The only thing you need to remember is that the voltage must be what you want (a 3 cell versus a 4 cell, for instance), and that your motor shouldn't want to draw more amps than the battery can provide. If that pack of smokes sized pack can only deliver 10 amps but the motor wants 20 then you've got issues which aren't going to turn out well, more than likely you'll destroy the battery, but usualy the ESC simple shuts down the motor because the voltage drop caused by the excessive amp draw will go below LVC (low voltage shutoff you have the ESC set for). Same thing applies to the ESC. You want your input voltage (battery) to match what the ESC can handle, and you don't want the ESC being asked to provide more amps by the motor than the ESC is capable of delivering. It'll get hot and do a thermal shut down (if you are lucky). Now, ESCs can be "pushed" a bit beyond their rated amp draw provided you cool them real well, such as adding an extra heat sink and providing plenty of air flow. However, this is never a wise move. I do it on a 30 amp ESC because my 12T motor on the Stryker with an 8x6E prop is pulling close to 30 amps. I want to be sure the ESC stays cool as possible, and heat only causes resistance and wastes energy anyway.

Now, down to the problem with the motor. When you spin it you are seeing the shaft wobble only or is the bell also? If it's just the motor shaft then more than likely it's bent, and can be bent back into shape with some trial and error. Did you cut the shaft down so it is just long enough to allow the adaptor to seat properly? Extra shaft length will cause vibration and also the odds of bending it.

If it's the bell too then there is a fix for this and more than likely the shaft isn't bent as well. Remove the little C-clip on the back of the motor's shaft. There probably is a washer under it too. Now pull on the bell/shaft up front (it will be hard to do) and the bell and shaft should pull out of the motor. You'll notice a nut on top and bottom of the bell that holds the shaft in. Remove the top nut and bottom one and re-center them and the shaft in the bell. Spin it and see if you got it right. There might also be set screws holding the prop shaft inside it. If it turns out that the bell it's self is bent you can tweak it in a vise and strength it out. Spin it on a table or prop balancer or something until you get the thing straightened out. Once whatever you do above is done, stick the bell/shaft back onto the motor and spin it by hand, watching the back of the bell to see if it's magnets are wobbling and/or touching the stator. If so, remove and re-adjust. By the way, when removing/inserting the bell/shaft, make sure the bearings stay in the stator's shaft hole. There is one at front and back that the motor's prop shaft rides in.

If the motor is getting real hot after say 20 to 30 seconds of stationary running (with a prop on) then that's probably not normal. Either it's rubbing inside or you have too big a prop on it. Now, after roughly 30 to 60 seconds the motor can get hot regardless of if everything is OK. Remember that it doesn't have the air flowing by it that it would have in the air, and also that static thrust (on the ground) also doesn't allow the prop to unload (less resistance in the air), and so the amps will average 2 to 4 higher than what it would normaly draw. It's a fine line between when the motor should get hot, but I'd say after 15 to 20 seconds on a static run it shouldn't be hot. Warm, maybe.

I just had a BP21 that a friend re-winded (the one for So #4, in fact) run when I installed it back into the bell/shaft. You should feel a "cog" caused by magnet force as you hand spin the bell, but you shouldn't feel uneven "cog" or grab. That would be caused by something rubbing. Well, I hand turned the bell while looking in the back and couldn't see any magnets rubbing the stator. Removed the bell/shaft and didn't see any spots inside that might rub. So I decided to run the motor (without a prop) for about fifteen seconds and then checked if it was hot. It wasn't, so I did another run for about 30 to 40 seconds. Motor still wasn't even warm and when I hand spun it this time the grab was gone, so whatever was rubbing rubbed it's self away. Problem solved. Remember to pull the battery from the ESC completely before putting your hand anywhere near the motor because that's the only safe way, and this will also avoid any confusion if you have the ESC set to brake "ON".

Didn't mean to get so long in the message but it's a good overview for newbies to RC electronics anyway.


_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to LlamaFragments)
       Post #: 83

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/14/2008 7:56:30 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fisher

I have not been on here in a while. Looks like a bit of spirited discussion has been going on. I too have been looking for that perfect beginner plane. Inexpensive, easy to build and repair, easy to modify, wide flight envelope, good looks etc and relatively easy to fly. The SO fits many of these attributes to a T.




Couldn't have said it any better, and the rest of your message was right on as well. Nice to see you are still popping in.


_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to Fisher)
       Post #: 84

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/14/2008 7:59:31 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: layback2

i am thinking of building one and useing shafts from a BOW for the booms light weight and can run the control rods in them for the elevator and rudder great build ideas thanks


That's a great method to keep the tail end really light on a dual boom platform. I thought about doing it for the So but one of the reasons why I like the So is it's "tank-like" blocky/strong looks. If you want to get even lighter going that route then think about doing a V-tail across the booms, either upright or inverted. That would really kill some weight and add to looks of the thin booms. I may do a build like this in the near future.


_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to layback2)
       Post #: 85

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Par... - 3/14/2008 8:01:00 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Swift427

The two replies by critter and one by fisher are VERY MUCH appreciated. They beg for more relevant questions. Questions not so much related to this thread's build/mod emphasis, but questions that every beginner to intermediate newbie wants to know whether they know it or not or whether they even know how to phrase the intent of their question without causing too spirited a response, clutter or confusion.

If it's OK I'm going to copy and paste your three replies on your other (Part I) thread for a continuation of this very insightful parkflyer beginner newbie to intermediate quest for knowledge.

THANKS AGAIN !


Fine with me. It'll help to avoid clutter (or more of it, I should say) in this thread which was created to condense and explain the building of this and similar planes.


_____________________________

If you believe in Global Warming then shut your mouth. All that hot air is warming up the planet, remember?

(in reply to Swift427)
       Post #: 86

RE: Here's A Simple & FREE First Foam Build Plan! (Pa... - 3/14/2008 8:05:17 PM   
critterhunter



Posts: 2531
Joined: 9/24/2004
From: Brook Park, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: layback2

I want to see pics on what everyone is doing that will give others a better veiw on there own changes or build ideas for this and other planes made from foam.I like the idea of building a great plane and not costing you a arm and leg i was just wondering about useing different booms that would not cost a lot but round i quess it does not matter i even like the V tail idea for the same plane.I seen a camera plane made something like this but had large foam wings twin booms made from carbon arrows that are hollow and he placed his control rods inside the arrow to the elevator thanks for a great topic everyone


You'll be getting pictures of my completed build #4 along with the build steps from where I left off on the first few pages. It's completely done now and ready for it's weekend maiden #3 (this time in com