Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       


Premier Pilot 1/4 scale full body pilot
Seller:  Ren DiLeo
Details:   $99.00   |  9/21/2008   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> Full Scale planes, cars, helis, boats >> Airplanes - Full Scale >> Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/20/2008 6:22:37 PM   
west6008


 

Posts: 148
Joined: 11/10/2005
From: Morell, PE, CANADA
Status: offline
The deadstick landing a British Airways Boeing 777 pulled off a few days ago,
makes one wonder if they shouldnt put Flight Engineers back in these birds,
and take out 50% of the computers.
An Air Canada Boeing 757 that ran out of gas in 1983, and the Transat Airbus
that deadsticked into the Azores come to mind.
       Post #: 1

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/20/2008 8:19:37 PM   
ual767



Posts: 760
Joined: 12/3/2002
From: Chantilly, VA, USA
Status: online
We do not know the reason for the crash, so a flight engineer may or may not have helped. If it was something that happened abruptly at low altitude, then a flight engineer would be of no help. Plus, the flight you mention was coming from Beijing, so it would have had an augmented crew, so there were probably 3 pilots in the cockpit anyways. I was a DC-10 flight engineer for a while, and there is nothing that an engineer can do with a loss of all engines at low altitude. Today's computers offer a huge benefit of taking the loads off the flying pilots and monitoring the systems and letting them fly the plane. Plus, an engineer is an added expense for the airline, and we all know how likely they are to do that.

_____________________________

Sponsored by my personal bank account

(in reply to west6008)
       Post #: 2

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/20/2008 8:52:03 PM   
normgoyer


 

Posts: 726
Joined: 5/18/2006
From: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Status: offline
The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm

(in reply to ual767)
       Post #: 3

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 12:32:51 AM   
N1EDM



Posts: 1902
Joined: 7/19/2002
From: Brockton, MA, USA
Status: offline
Who was monitoring the fuel totalizer? Or, was it malfunctioning and giving them false readings?

From my military flying days, the FE would plan for the fuel load (allowing for winds en route etc.,) then add fuel for 3 missed approaches and then a divert to an alternate field. Was there any fuel in the tanks that just didn't make it to the engines? Or were the tanks bone dry?

Something here is not adding up, and I will admit that I have not been able to follow the story to find out any behind-the-scenes details. Has anyone else come up with any new news since this happened?

Bob

_____________________________

An expert is someone who has been doing it for 15 minutes longer than you.

(in reply to normgoyer)
       Post #: 4

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 12:41:20 AM   
normgoyer


 

Posts: 726
Joined: 5/18/2006
From: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Status: offline
News reports indicate that there was plenty of fuel. The problem appears to be that the computer for some reason would not advance the throttles. The crew tried every trick they knew to advance them manually but all failed. The Captain then made the wise decision to "fly the plane" and he got it on the ground very hard but no one was killed. He did his job very well. Norm

(in reply to N1EDM)
       Post #: 5

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 12:44:21 AM   
Rotorwrench



Posts: 50
Joined: 11/4/2003
From: Abbeville, LA, USA
Status: offline
Following an uneventful flight from Beijing, China, the aircraft was established on an ILS approach to Runway 27L at London Heathrow. Initially the approach progressed normally, with the Autopilot and Autothrottle engaged, until the aircraft was at a height of approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down. The aircraft then descended rapidly and struck the ground, some 1,000 ft short of the paved runway surface, just inside the airfield boundary fence. The aircraft stopped on the very beginning of the paved surface of Runway 27L. During the short ground roll the right main landing gear separated from the wing and the left main landing gear was pushed up through the wing root. A significant amount of fuel leaked from the aircraft but there was no fire. An emergency evacuation via the slides was supervised by the cabin crew and all occupants left the aircraft, some receiving minor injuries.
Initial indications from the interviews and Flight Recorder analyses show the flight and approach to have progressed normally until the aircraft was established on late finals for Runway 27L. At approximately 600 ft and 2 miles from touch down, the Autothrottle demanded an increase in thrust from the two engines but the engines did not respond. Following further demands for increased thrust from the Autothrottle, and subsequently the flight crew moving the throttle levers, the engines similarly failed to respond. The aircraft speed reduced and the aircraft descended onto the grass short of the paved runway surface.



< Message edited by Rotorwrench -- 1/22/2008 12:49:42 AM >

(in reply to N1EDM)
       Post #: 6

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 1:13:43 AM   
FLYBOY



Posts: 8691
Joined: 1/7/2002
From: Missoula, MT, USA
Status: offline
Looks to me like the pilot did an incredible job! 3 hurt but not bad, no fatalities and no fire. Nice job.

_____________________________

Fly it till the wings come off.

(in reply to Rotorwrench)
       Post #: 7

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 1:28:15 AM   
N1EDM



Posts: 1902
Joined: 7/19/2002
From: Brockton, MA, USA
Status: offline
Yeah, thank God for no fatalities... that was unreal.

Thanks for updating me. It's going to be very interesting to find out what combination of factors caused this system to fail.

I appreciate the updates, guys.

Bob

_____________________________

An expert is someone who has been doing it for 15 minutes longer than you.

(in reply to FLYBOY)
       Post #: 8

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 1/22/2008 1:35:30 AM   
pilotpete2



Posts: 1475
Joined: 10/31/2002
From: Lyndonville, VT, USA
Status: offline
These are all very different scenarios.
The "Gimly Glider" incident was primarily due to to a refueling mess up, ground crew pumped the requested units of fuel in pounds rather than Kilograms, add in a situation where the fuel gauges also were inoperative.
I watched the TV recreation of the Transat incident with great interest, as a non pilot (well some hours of flight training and 20 years of R/C), my take on it was that the captain handled the situation poorly, it seemed as though he didn't want to believe the computers and as the Airbus was a twin, shutting down an engine would be an immediate in flight emergency situation and a divert to the nearest suitable airport, if I'm not mistaken.
In the case of BA038, it looks as though the pilots had absolutely no choice but to glide her in as best they could. I sincerely hope that nothing they did or didn't do prior to the problem on approach is found to be a factor in the accident.
Pete

_____________________________

"If the woman don''t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy"

(in reply to west6008)
       Post #: 9

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/4/2008 6:56:25 PM   
Wayne22



Posts: 4340
Joined: 4/10/2002
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Status: online
quote:

The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks.


Y'know.....I read that back in 1964. .......I can't remember which magazine though.......





_____________________________

All I ask is for a chance to prove that money can't make me happy......

(in reply to pilotpete2)
       Post #: 10

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/5/2008 10:15:49 PM   
Bax


 

Posts: 12457
Joined: 4/26/2002
From: Champaign, IL, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: normgoyer

The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm



And then the pilot's announcement will be: "Thank you for flying ABC Airways. You are traveling in the finest airliner on the market with the latest in autocontrol software. The triply-redundant computers will insure that nothing can go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong........."



_____________________________

Bill Baxter, Manager Hobby Services/Futaba Service/North America
3002 N. Apollo Dr. Ste. 1 Champaign, IL 61822 USA
Service Phone: 217 398-0007
Email: hobbyservices@hobbico.com

(in reply to normgoyer)
       Post #: 11

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/6/2008 12:49:28 AM   
normgoyer


 

Posts: 726
Joined: 5/18/2006
From: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Status: offline
Whoa Bill, it is your company I understand that is building the 2.4 FASST auto pilot system for the airlines!! Norm

(in reply to Bax)
       Post #: 12

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/7/2008 4:30:15 PM   
Bax


 

Posts: 12457
Joined: 4/26/2002
From: Champaign, IL, USA
Status: offline
Low, Norm, Low.

_____________________________

Bill Baxter, Manager Hobby Services/Futaba Service/North America
3002 N. Apollo Dr. Ste. 1 Champaign, IL 61822 USA
Service Phone: 217 398-0007
Email: hobbyservices@hobbico.com

(in reply to normgoyer)
       Post #: 13

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/7/2008 4:45:46 PM   
normgoyer


 

Posts: 726
Joined: 5/18/2006
From: Apple Valley, CA, USA
Status: offline
Sorry Bill, it gets boting up here in the High Desert in the winter time. I have been using Futaba exclusively for about 30years now, now fly the your new 2.4rigs. Norm

(in reply to Bax)
       Post #: 14

RE: Deadstick Boeing 777, Heathrow - 2/7/2008 5:34:44 PM   
pilotpete2



Posts: 1475
Joined: 10/31/2002
From: Lyndonville, VT, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bax


quote:

ORIGINAL: normgoyer

The eventual goal is to eliminate the whole crew and let computers run the show, and that time is closer than everyone thinks. Norm



And then the pilot's announcement will be: "Thank you for flying ABC Airways. You are traveling in the finest airliner on the market with the latest in autocontrol software. The triply-redundant computers will insure that nothing can go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong...<click>...go wrong........."




Yeah, it's one thing to have unmanned people movers, as some airports have, such as the monorail at EWR and the subway (I think it is unmanned) at DIA
But I'm not going, if that Boeing doesn't have two pilots up front

Bax,
Are you going to be at the WRAM show this month?
Cheers,
Pete

_____________________________

"If the woman don''t find you handsome, they should at least find you handy"

(in reply to Bax)
       Post #: 15