aflipz
Posts: 934
Joined: 7/2/2005 From: Montreal,
QC, CANADA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: altavillan I might have gone with the thrust motor but Chief has gone the extra mile stocking so many fantastic kits and combos and parts for so many modelers, including my self. Hacker doesn't try to snow you with BS saying a motor will run a 13" prop when all evidence suggests that it will not. Don't know about you but I have 7 acres of flight area right outside my back door and most evenings in the summer I'll get in 3 to 5 flights. Pushing a small motor to power a largish plane will cause a failure in too short of a time for me. And I don't really like the flippy floppy stuff, I'm more tuned in to big grand manouvers that end with a torque roll right in front. I plan on staying on the throttle a bit more than just a flip flop to a hovering stuff. Are you implying that saying the PA thrust 30 being able to spin a 13" prop is BS? It's too bad you didn't give it more faith you'd be surprised, this thing LAUGHS in the face of 5 consecutive hard flights, bring it on! I once put 14 flights through it barely stopping at all between flights. This was on a plane 2oz heavier than this one. It was no hotter at the 14th than it was at the first. Have no fear it's not weak either, on a 12x6 it'll hover the 260 at half throttle and have plenty of punch out, unlimited vertical... And, for the thrust junkies it easily handles a 13x6.5 apc. Of course your setup will work, but don't go giving people the impression the thrust 30 is inadequate when it really is not. I wish you could fly your setup then have PA give you a thrust 30 to try and compare so you could see what i mean. I know where you are coming from believe me, i have seen my share of planes have suggested power systems that weren't worth crap but with IPA's it just the opposite; it's all but impossible to get a more balanced setup.
|