chippedprop
Posts: 730
Joined: 11/9/2004 From: Spartanburg,
SC, USA Status: offline
|
I think I recall your name on some of the older Stryker posts. I'm working on streamlined FJ. On the current one I replaced the stock canopy with a (don't LOL) with one made from a 3 liter soda bottle--cut to fit over the space. Added 6 places to screw it down. Much less drag. I even have enough space to run a 4c 3300ma batt.--drops right in. I have used this on all Strykers for the last 1 1/2 yrs. I guess I'm going to post current photos as I can't find the old ones. The new one, as I'm working the details out on paper, will have exposed motor like the Stryker. I have read many people discuss the shape of the motor mount area on thr FJ, as blocking air for the prop to bite. I agree. So I will try to solve this and hopefully made a faster plane with the same motor. The goal(s) 1- increase speed by reducing drag 2-increase flying time at WOT 3- be able to change motors in under 3 minutes 4-increase the OMG factor by 2 Stay tuned it's going to be a different FJ CH Check my gallery and you will see a very different Stryker
< Message edited by chippedprop -- 2/13/2008 8:18:07 PM >
_____________________________
PERFORMANCE IS EVERYTHING !!!
|