DarZeelon
Posts: 7080
Joined: 4/9/2003 From: Rosh-Ha'Ayin, ISRAEL Status: offline
|
Tom, I do not think the Jett .60L poses as a benchmark... What a .60 size engine can do on a .40 size prop is clearly not benchmark material... The only justification to this appearance is the fact that this specific engine is the size and weight of a .40... But it definitely isn't a .40 engine... Since the generally accepted .60 size prop is a 12x6, if the Jett .60L is to be considered a benchmark .60 engine, it must spin that prop faster than any other engine of the same displacement. But, for the RPM hungry Jett, the 12x6 APC is a .90 size prop... And... The MA prop that you used is a particularly low load prop, that cannot be compared to an APC, for instance, with which Jett stated RPM numbers are quoted. Spinning that prop at 17,510 RPM, according to the PropPower, requires 1.93 HP. Spinning an APC 10x6 prop at 17,510 RPM, according to the PropPower, requires 2.02 HP. The Jett .60LX spins this prop at 18K (2.20 HP)... It also cost $405-... We're not comparing competitive items...
_____________________________
Dar Zeelon - ISRAEL - ddzeelon@gmail.com MVVS - Jett - Nelson - Bolly - Mejzlik
|