Built tough enough?  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> WildHare R/C Support >> Built tough enough? Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 10:05:41 AM   
MetallicaJunkie



Posts: 912
Joined: 9/17/2006
From: donna, TX, USA
Status: offline 		ive been flying/building rc airplanes on and off since 92' but was introduced to the hobby at a tender age of four (83') thanks to my father.... lately ive been building my skills and my latest/biggest subject was a Maxxair velox......powered by a saito 150, i maidened it this past saturday, and on the third flight i did a level snap roll, and the fuse broke at its weakest joint/point........one of the elder gentleman of the group said that the new lighter arfs are not meant for maneuvers as such.......... my plan is to buy a wildhare v2 50cc edge and fly it with in reason,......should i be concerned about it failing on me like my maxair velox did, doing a basic snap move?

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize 		Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize 		Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize 		Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize 		Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by MetallicaJunkie -- 2/10/2008 10:13:06 AM >

_____________________________

Freestyle Junkie
Revver Bro #217
       Post #: 1

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 1:39:14 PM   
sailing1


 

Posts: 278
Joined: 8/17/2004
From: tulsa, OK, USA
Status: offline 		Looks like some poor quality control to me. I am on my third wild Hare (still have all three) and haven't had a major failure yet but that doesn't mean I don't check my planes for stress problems. The Wild hare instructions recommend you go over new planes with thin CA around high stress joints such as the engine box and servo mounts in order to forstall failures like you had. A good practice for all planes.

The only Wild Hare failure I know about that was like what you experienced was to a 41% plane with around 1000 really hard 3d flights on it. That plane was repaired and is flying again I think.

I am only a sample of one, but the Wild Hare ARFs I have are the best I have run accross and you can't beat their service.

(in reply to MetallicaJunkie)
       Post #: 2

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 1:45:57 PM   
marzo91



Posts: 606
Joined: 2/29/2004
From: Port Edwards, WI, USA
Status: offline 		I'm with you on the strength o f the WH planes. I've been abusing them for years without a stuctural failure.

Most of the damage to your plane looks like a clean break at the glue-joints. It should be an easy fix.

(in reply to sailing1)
       Post #: 3

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 2:20:15 PM   
rctom



Posts: 5121
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline 		Just to clarify for some people who do not read carefully, THAT FAILURE WAS NOT IN A WILD HARE PLANE, it happened with some other brand.

FYI I've never seen an actual in-air structural failure in one of our planes that was not preceeded by either some damage or some kind of modification by the user, or some mistake like leaving out the wing retainer screws.

We have several thousand Wild Hare planes out there, if they were falling out of the sky you would have heard about it.

TF

(in reply to marzo91)
       Post #: 4

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 3:53:06 PM   
Sukhoi4Me


 

Posts: 179
Joined: 5/12/2007
From: Tulsa, OK, USA
Status: offline 		Amen to all of the above positive comments about WH. And let me add a new one, the customer service provided by Tom and Pat is better than just about anyone I can think of at this moment. All of that at a fantastic value for the price.

(in reply to rctom)
       Post #: 5

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 4:58:20 PM   
Grotesquebass



Posts: 634
Joined: 9/25/2004
From: lexington park , MD, USA
Status: offline 		i Second the above statement they are so good at what they do even my wife calls about the airplanes maybe she will get the hint about the sukhoi i want

_____________________________

"I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell"

(in reply to Sukhoi4Me)
       Post #: 6

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 6:23:05 PM   
MetallicaJunkie



Posts: 912
Joined: 9/17/2006
From: donna, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rctom

Just to clarify for some people who do not read carefully, THAT FAILURE WAS NOT IN A WILD HARE PLANE, it happened with some other brand.

FYI I've never seen an actual in-air structural failure in one of our planes that was not preceeded by either some damage or some kind of modification by the user, or some mistake like leaving out the wing retainer screws.

We have several thousand Wild Hare planes out there, if they were falling out of the sky you would have heard about it.

TF

im sorry Tom i had a few too many last night, and over expressed myself , i probably shouldnt even have made this thread,... The flight failure i had was not in a Wild Hare airplane, it was in a Maxair Velox, it broke in an area i took for granted in an arf.


It didnt break at the motor mount, or the firewall....it broke in the front fuselage region between the wings leading edge and the firewall

_____________________________

Freestyle Junkie
Revver Bro #217

(in reply to rctom)
       Post #: 7

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/10/2008 6:30:36 PM   
Sukhoi4Me


 

Posts: 179
Joined: 5/12/2007
From: Tulsa, OK, USA
Status: offline 		Grotesque, don't you have an extra you should be working on??? and your now worrying about a Shukhoi???? Two big planes for me is enough. (WH 50cc Sukhoi, WH 35% Estra) Until one meets its expiration date, no need for another!! hahaha Well until desire exceeds pocketbook restraints.

(in reply to MetallicaJunkie)
       Post #: 8

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/11/2008 12:51:05 AM   
rctom



Posts: 5121
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline 		Not your frault, but I know people who read these forums.

They see a broken plane, it's in the Wild Hare support forum so that instantly jump on it that the plane fell apart and it was one of ours.

Unfortunately many guys don't read anything and just jump to conclusions, and once something like that gets started it can't be stopped.

TF

(in reply to Sukhoi4Me)
       Post #: 9

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/11/2008 1:03:33 AM   
marzo91



Posts: 606
Joined: 2/29/2004
From: Port Edwards, WI, USA
Status: offline 		Tom is right. I think the post should be moved to a different area. Most people do know this is not a WildHare plane, but some may not know. Tom has worked several years to provide the very best performing planes at the very lowest cost to us. I guess I just want to say "Thanks" to Tom and Patty for making some dreams come true.

(in reply to rctom)
       Post #: 10

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/11/2008 2:15:04 AM   
aaxiss



Posts: 151
Joined: 12/18/2006
From: Orange, CA, USA
Status: offline 		As to the flaming of WH planes.... I just don't get it. All ARF planes have their quirks to be sure but I have never read anything nor seen anything that would lead me to believe that Tom is selling an Inferior product, if anything maybe superior when you take into account the price and customer service. I guess the people bashing WH products have to try and make themselves feel better by trying to convince themselves and others that paying top dollar means you got the best product. So following that reasoning they jump all over WH planes because the cost is lower. ~shrug

Anyway great plane at a great price in the WH sukhoi and better CS than any other IMO....

_____________________________

Don
If there is a 40% plane out there drawing 42 amps it's because it has an on-board welder.

(in reply to marzo91)
       Post #: 11

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/11/2008 3:29:52 AM   
dbcaster


 

Posts: 305
Joined: 7/1/2006
From: Petaluma, CA, USA
Status: online 		aaxiss,
I believe you just made Toms point. Nobody is flaming WH Planes here. The original post was about a different plane manufacture not a WH plane.

(in reply to aaxiss)
       Post #: 12

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/11/2008 3:54:02 AM   
MetallicaJunkie



Posts: 912
Joined: 9/17/2006
From: donna, TX, USA
Status: offline 		Moderators, could you please delete or move this post, i dont want to confuse anybody or hurt Wild Hare RC in any way.... i also understand there are people that don't read before making comments, and jump to conclusions like a****s

_____________________________

Freestyle Junkie
Revver Bro #217

(in reply to dbcaster)
       Post #: 13

RE: Built tough enough? - 2/15/2008 3:32:11 AM   
thewrap


 

Posts: 189
Joined: 3/17/2004
From: Highland Village, TX, USA
Status: offline 		I own two right know and saving for a third owned four and love em to death. Can't wait to see what happens for the future.

(in reply to MetallicaJunkie)
       Post #: 14

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> WildHare R/C Support >> Built tough enough?
Page: [1]





Jump to: