RysiuM
Posts: 1400
Joined: 4/22/2003 From: Elk Grove, CA, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: canwhitewolf quote from an article at http://nitroplanes.blogspot.com/ ... makes one wonder if we are all talking about the same airplane doesnt it with such a glowing report the above report doesnt sound right to me for some reason, Let me say a few words from so called "Internet Expert" It looks like the author (no name, just 'rcpilot') is on NitroModels payroll or sponsorship. The sentence in his "blog" (the one I highlighted): quote:
The plane flies fine on the stock NIMH pack and brushed motors, in spite of all the internet "Experts" saying it would not. It will loop and roll, no problem, but it's modestly powered with the stock setup, and flight times are maybe five minutes, tops. is simple lie (or if you don't like this word I can say "misleading" . Especially in the context of his response about "stock battery" quote:
I did fly it with the stock 8.4v NIMH. I hand launched it, did not try a takeoff. It did indeed fly, but it was no powerhouse, that's for sure. But fly it did. A hand-launched paper plane does fly to, and it is not a powerhouse too. If you toss it really hard it will even do loops or rolls. That is how stock A-10 flies. Somehow I did not see any loop or any rolls on the Youtube Guanli's commercial videos presented on this tread. I did a loop on my upgraded A-10 and it is more like a "flip" at the top instead of round circle. With brushed motors it will not even climb 45 degrees before it stalls. Saying short this article has exactly the same form and template as any "paid review" you can find in any printed magazine (just because of that I stopped my subscriptions to all of them).
_____________________________
Mather Aerospace Modelers, Inc. AMA Gold Leader Club, Charter #1243, Sacramento, CA
|