GP combat Spitfire  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Combat >> GP combat Spitfire
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
GP combat Spitfire - 2/16/2008 10:40:56 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
I just picked one of these up and was wondering if anyone has one or has flown one yet? I am planning on using a .25 FX and will just sport fly it. Not really interested in 2610 anymore. I may use this to try and generate some interest in a scale combat demo for our club's big warbird event at the end of the summer.
       Post #: 1

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/18/2008 7:18:56 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
Well, I guess nobody yet has. My initial impression is very good. Everything is included and of high quality. The only thing I will not use are the EZ connectors on the servos. Too likely to fail.
I am still amazed at what we can get sometimes for so little money. IMO

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 2

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/22/2008 4:26:39 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
I almost have her ready to fly. Just need to secure the radio, mount a switch and complete the aileron linkages. I will try to post a pic. If it is nice this weekend I am hoping for a test flight. I figure this thread will show some interest eventually.

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 3

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/23/2008 3:34:00 AM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
Here are a few pics of my new 1\12th scale spitfire. This is a very nice airplane and I am confident it will fly very well. It really looks pretty cool. I should be able to report on the test flight on Sunday.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 4

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/23/2008 6:25:17 PM   
Clean



Posts: 990
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Parkville, MO, USA
Status: offline
That doesn't look anything LIKE an Oscar.

_____________________________

From Somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane (aka Mr Clean) Rever Brother #168 Time Man of the Year

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 5

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/24/2008 12:42:24 AM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
I ran the engine earlier and all seems to be well. At my altitude I always found a 9-5 APC to work well. The flat landers can get away with a 9-6 I think. I will leave this a sport setup as I will not be flying combat with it. Doing the test tomorrow.

(in reply to Clean)
       Post #: 6

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/24/2008 10:45:42 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
Just back from the field. The Spitfire flies great. No trim, everything worked excellent. It is very sensative to the controls, so leave them conservative on the elevator. I was spot on the CG but had to add lead to do so. I think the RX battery needs to be moved back. I also used a heavy aluminum spinner. My all up weight was only 2.5 lbs. so I just lived with adding some lead to the tail.
All the way around this little plane is a pleasure and everyone at the field had great comments about it. I suppose someone will find some use from these posts whether anyone feels the need to chime in or not. I would really like to see an FW190 come out. I would be the first in line for that one.

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 7

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 1:37:45 AM   
Clean



Posts: 990
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Parkville, MO, USA
Status: offline
Sounds good. I think most of the reports on the GP planes has been good with just a weak tail here or there.

congrats on a successful maiden.

_____________________________

From Somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane (aka Mr Clean) Rever Brother #168 Time Man of the Year

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 8

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 2:43:26 AM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
Clean, Thanks for responding! I am beginning to think there is something wrong with this thread! Maybe I should have put it somewhere else.
Regaurdless of what this airplane is used for, (I know it is not a viable modern 2610 machine) it is a great little airplane.

(in reply to Clean)
       Post #: 9

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 8:05:50 AM   
westdr6113


 

Posts: 80
Joined: 8/26/2007
From: kailua, HI, USA
Status: offline
its a good thing you didn't use the easy connectors, wished I hadn't used them on my p-40. The elevator pushrod pulled out on it's 6th flight. The plane went into a vertical dive and hit the ground at WOT. Total loss. I wont make that mistake again

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 10

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 12:19:04 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
Sorry to hear about your P40. I really wish the manufactures would not have builders use those things. You know, it would not be legal at a contest. In many events that type of termination is not allowed on a primary function like aileron and elevator.
It was very easy for me to mark and make a z bend. I was accurate enough to trim out the surface with my sub trim function.

(in reply to westdr6113)
       Post #: 11

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 2:03:13 PM   
westdr6113


 

Posts: 80
Joined: 8/26/2007
From: kailua, HI, USA
Status: offline
it was kinda cool to watch though would a been alot cooler if it wasnt my plane oh well lesson learned

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 12

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/25/2008 10:58:13 PM   
vertical grimmace


 

Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2004
From: ft collins , CO, USA
Status: offline
I think it would have been a lot cooler if it would have been lost T-boning another plane! If you are going to lose them I think it is best when they are seeing action.

(in reply to westdr6113)
       Post #: 13

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/26/2008 1:33:23 AM   
Reverse_Sensing


 

Posts: 45
Joined: 11/14/2005
From: Petaluma, CA, USA
Status: offline
There is nothing wrong with flying balsa in combat, just as long as Im not the one flying it.

(in reply to vertical grimmace)
       Post #: 14

RE: GP combat Spitfire - 2/26/2008 1:50:40 AM   
Clean



Posts: 990
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Parkville, MO, USA
Status: offline
If I'm gonna go down I wanna take somebody out!

Put an Ultra Stick in with one of those darn things which is a shame because I lost my 2nd trainer with one of the stinkin things. Luckily it was a tank and I was able to rebuild. But that plane was heavy for a 40 and I had a Fox 25 pulling it around. Just barely did the job.

Then, I had them on throttles and thought, ehh, they don't get much load there. Well I tell ya, engines going to idle or WOT at odd times really tends to ruin your day.

_____________________________

From Somewhere near Parkville, Mo.
William Crane (aka Mr Clean) Rever Brother #168 Time Man of the Year

(in reply to Reverse_Sensing)