Robotech
Posts: 908
Joined: 1/17/2002 From: Pine Bluff, AR, Status: offline
|
quote:
Original: Hossfly Robotech, as a RCer for only 7 years, you possibly may not have seen a lot more that happens here and there. In addition, is it just even remotely possible that you haven't read, "....a single valid, practical, reason why an independent AMA chartered club would refuse PPP'ers as club members at regular dues rates." is simply because you have placed yourself as judge and jury in determining what constitutes, "....a single valid, practical, reason why an independent AMA chartered club would refuse PPP'ers as club members at regular dues rates?" Well of course I've placed myself as judge and jury in what I determine to be a single valid, practical, reason why an independent AMA chartered club would refuse PPP'ers as club members at regular dues rates. Who should I place as judge and jury concerning what I believe? quote:
That being said, I have a reason that for me constitutes "....a single valid, practical, reason why an independent AMA chartered club would refuse PPP'ers as club members at regular dues rates." Whether you accept it or not, my mind is made up and no need to try to change it. See my response above. It applies to you too? Yes? I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm expressing my opinion, just as you have. Your tenure in the hobby does not make dissenting views less valid. Cast your club vote in the negative. One man, one vote. If your club votes the other way then you'll have the choice of abiding by it or starting/buying another club. quote:
That reason is: $2.5 million liability insurance for first class and $500,000 liability insurance for the economy class. If a PF prop catches me in the eye, unless Joe Parkee Flyee has significant assets, that $500,000 is insufficent to compensate me for a condition where I may not be able to function outside being a burden on others. Perhaps you can quote a single instance of Joe Parkie taking out an eyeball with damages in excess of $1/2 mil? Insurance coverage is all about risk. How about a member that has an annual income of $100K that gets hit by a 40 size quickee 500 between the eyes and ends up brain dead. Is $2.5 mil insufficient to "compensate me for a condition where I may not be able to function outside being a burden on others"? How about my family? quote:
Most clubs obtain AMA Charters and require AMA membership for one reason: INSURANCE. If the economy class wants my first class flying facility, then they have to upgrade to first class AMA. That is as simple as I can make it for you. It is valid for me and as far as you are concerned, that is the only validation required. As it stands the AMA Chartered club's liability remains at the high limit regardless of the AMA members "status level". Are you saying it is not? In the context of the club, there is no difference. Does your first class flying facility require members to have home owners insurance in addition to AMA liability? If you or your club get sued for $2.6 mil. wheres the additional $100K going to come from? quote:
Other valid items are: 1.) the constant checking things ref. the PF is an additional burden on an already stressed group known as Charter Club officers, those volunteers that give up their hobby time to keep clubs functioning. 2.) keeping sure PF stays within the limitations, more work for the real AMA members and 3.) the usual crap a club has to endure when there are two different factions within the group. 1 and 2 - you're pretty much saying the same thing. Both being exaggerated. Really, how much additional "work" would be involved? A goober that ignores rules and limitations is just as, if not more, likely to be flying a Avistar with a 46FX on it. 3 - If you have that attitude then you are the one promoting divisiveness and factionalism within your club. It seems that those I have encountered with a similar mindset are the cause of division within clubs and that division will exist with or without the AMA's PPP members. quote:
AMA made this bed with rocks, let AMA sleep in it. I seems they are willing to do so. When and if the "bed with rocks" fails they will change it.
|