Engines Comparison  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       


O.S. Engines O.S. BGX-1 3500 w/ BCM #4224 Pitt
Seller:  jmhernan
Details:   $200.00   |  10/2/2008   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> Engines Comparison
Page: [1] 2   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Engines Comparison - 3/20/2008 9:52:13 PM   
alfredbmor



Posts: 1133
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: El Paso, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hi to all:
I have been running a four stroke Magnum 120 size with 15% fuel and a Master Airscrew K series tacking 8,900 rpm.
this engine weights 32 oz.
I'd like to have more punch for my Carl Goldberg Ultimate and I have been thinking on the:
Two stroke
OS 120 AX which weights 31 oz.
But I do not know how it performa and which prop is it capable of turn with enough power.

Thanks for any advise.


_____________________________

Saito Club Member
       Post #: 1

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/20/2008 9:57:41 PM   
w8ye



Posts: 17492
Joined: 12/11/2001
From: Taylortown, OH, USA
Status: offline
If more power is what you want, you need to get a bigger engine like a Saito 180, OS 160 or a Mark 210. That way you will have certain inalienable bragging rights and you yourself will notice the difference.

< Message edited by w8ye -- 3/20/2008 11:18:53 PM >


_____________________________

Attended the CutFinger Institute of DirtNap University for years but never did graduate....

Club Saito Member #7
Original AMA #31261

(in reply to alfredbmor)
       Post #: 2

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/20/2008 10:19:31 PM   
alfredbmor



Posts: 1133
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: El Paso, TX, USA
Status: offline
I also want to maintain the whole airframe light enough, that is why I was thinking on a 32 oz engine top weight. I am sorry I did not mention it before.


_____________________________

Saito Club Member

(in reply to w8ye)
       Post #: 3

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/20/2008 10:55:02 PM   
asmund


 

Posts: 1909
Joined: 11/20/2005
From: Floroe, NORWAY
Status: offline
A 120 twostroke will provide more power than your 120 fourstroke and not weigh much more. I might suggest the ASP/Magnum AR 120 XL. I have this engine and it tachs exactly the same as a friends 120 AX (we have both done some mods on them, but still)
If you want to save a few bucks the Magnum is great and if you have alot of $ the AX will make you just as happy. The AX have a muffler that can be mounted inside the cowling for nice clean looks

(in reply to alfredbmor)
       Post #: 4

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 1:14:25 AM   
rexracer


 

Posts: 254
Joined: 1/23/2006
From: New Milford, CT, USA
Status: offline
Listed weight for my Saito 1.80 is only 31 oz, less muffler. It turns a MA Classic 18x6 at 8800 rpm on 15%.

_____________________________

Club Saito member #173

(in reply to asmund)
       Post #: 5

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 1:55:52 AM   
blw



Posts: 4569
Joined: 3/15/2004
From: Auburn, AL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: asmund

A 120 twostroke will provide more power than your 120 fourstroke and not weigh much more. I might suggest the ASP/Magnum AR 120 XL. I have this engine and it tachs exactly the same as a friends 120 AX (we have both done some mods on them, but still)
If you want to save a few bucks the Magnum is great and if you have alot of $ the AX will make you just as happy. The AX have a muffler that can be mounted inside the cowling for nice clean looks


You may lose out if you need a bigger fuel tank for the AX.

< Message edited by blw -- 3/21/2008 1:57:07 AM >


_____________________________

The ultimate responsibility of pilots is to fulfill the dreams of the countless millions who can only stare skyward...and wish.

(in reply to asmund)
       Post #: 6

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 3:18:24 AM   
Harry Lagman


 

Posts: 1153
Joined: 11/19/2003
From: Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
Status: offline
Alfred, you are going to get lots of recommendations for engines you aren't interested in when you start threads like this. The Saito club will chip in with their recommendations, the Nordic division of the Cheap and Cheerful Model Engines Enthusiasts Club will recommend the latest delights from mainland China and you might even get Motorman come in with a blanket recommendation to go with a YS 1.10 or 1.40.

So, to focus somewhat on the two engines you mention, this is what I know...

The OS AX 1.20 is a strong engine that is easy on fuel. Check out the pattern forum - a lot of guys there use the AX 1.20 in airframes like the Venus II and Excelleron as practice ships. They are very good engines. They are stronger than a YS 1.10, which is in turn stronger than an OS 1.20 Surpass, which is in turn stronger than your Magnum 1.20 FS. The AX would be a good choice for your expoits. It should pull that MA K series prop that your current engine does 8900 rpm with (I'm guessing it's a 15 x 8 or a 16 x 6) at something approaching mid to high nines - that's a big difference.

Good luck and let us know what you decide.

Edit: Prop size

< Message edited by Harry Lagman -- 3/21/2008 3:23:36 AM >

(in reply to alfredbmor)
       Post #: 7

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 1:49:33 PM   
jaka


 

Posts: 4536
Joined: 12/11/2001
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Status: offline
Hi!
The cheapest way of getting good performance is getting rid of that Master A prop and instead invest in a APC prop.
You should be using a 15x8 or 16x6 prop for your Ultimate.

_____________________________

Jan Karlsson Airracing products
MVVS, Motul "Micro" all synthetic oil

(in reply to alfredbmor)
       Post #: 8

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 6:03:00 PM   
Ed Cregger



Posts: 7745
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Ringgold, GA, USA
Status: offline
And then replace the engine with a Super Tigre G2300 (1.40 CID).

But resign yourself to running a couple of gallons of 5% nitro fuel through it before it becomes civilized.


Ed Cregger


_____________________________

Artisan

"Flying models since the Fifties - I'll get the hang of this yet!!!"

(in reply to jaka)
       Post #: 9

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/21/2008 10:46:57 PM   
MOTORMAN37



Posts: 2091
Joined: 10/26/2002
From: CLINTONVILLE, WI, USA
Status: offline
Alfred,
I would recommend a YS 1.40 Sport, if you want awesome performance.

< Message edited by blw -- 3/22/2008 2:45:28 AM >

(in reply to Ed Cregger)
       Post #: 10

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/22/2008 2:35:41 AM   
Ed Cregger



Posts: 7745
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Ringgold, GA, USA
Status: offline
After due consideration and experience over the decades, I've decided that YS engines, as good as they might be, are not for me. They are more trouble than they are worth.


Ed Cregger


_____________________________

Artisan

"Flying models since the Fifties - I'll get the hang of this yet!!!"

(in reply to MOTORMAN37)
       Post #: 11

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/24/2008 9:03:25 PM   
alfredbmor



Posts: 1133
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: El Paso, TX, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Harry Lagman

Alfred, you are going to get lots of recommendations for engines you aren't interested in when you start threads like this. The Saito club will chip in with their recommendations, the Nordic division of the Cheap and Cheerful Model Engines Enthusiasts Club will recommend the latest delights from mainland China and you might even get Motorman come in with a blanket recommendation to go with a YS 1.10 or 1.40.

So, to focus somewhat on the two engines you mention, this is what I know...

The OS AX 1.20 is a strong engine that is easy on fuel. Check out the pattern forum - a lot of guys there use the AX 1.20 in airframes like the Venus II and Excelleron as practice ships. They are very good engines. They are stronger than a YS 1.10, which is in turn stronger than an OS 1.20 Surpass, which is in turn stronger than your Magnum 1.20 FS. The AX would be a good choice for your expoits. It should pull that MA K series prop that your current engine does 8900 rpm with (I'm guessing it's a 15 x 8 or a 16 x 6) at something approaching mid to high nines - that's a big difference.

Good luck and let us know what you decide.

Edit: Prop size

I appreciate the help of you all.
I quoted the Harry Lagman post because it clarifies my original post.
But all other posts are creative and interesting as well so I thank you all.
I really do not want to spend a bunch of money trying engines that easily could fly my CG Ultimate.
It fly just ok with my XL 4 stroke Magnum that can swing a 16 x 6 Master airscrew K series at almost 9,000 but if a try a wooden prop I have to use a 15 x 6 because the lack of punch of this engine.
When I say that it fly just ok I mean that it go up and down with enough power but it needs more power to do some acrobatic routines and vertical is very poor.
A friend of mine use to have the same airframe in the ARF version which was overpowered with a YS 140 but it was also a very heavy combo and when he had the first death stick it was also the end of his biplane, I just remember that it feel from about 200 ft like a brick.
I just thought that I could go with an alternative kind of cheap and lighter engine, that is why I thought about the OS AX 1.20 and I wish to know the tach readings and behavior of this particular engine.
Thanks again for your help.


_____________________________

Saito Club Member

(in reply to Harry Lagman)
       Post #: 12

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/25/2008 2:49:25 AM   
proptop



Posts: 4509
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: Rome, NY, USA
Status: offline
The Webra 1.20 2 stroke is also worth considering IMO, and fits your wt. requirement as well.

_____________________________

It's bad luck to be superstitious...
Revver Bro #77

(in reply to alfredbmor)
       Post #: 13

RE: Engines Comparison - 3/25/2008 9:11:03 PM   
alfredbmor



Posts: 1133
Joined: 6/1/2005
From: El Paso, TX, USA
Status: offline
I had a webra engine 15 years ago, I had good luck on that one. Aparently Horizon does not carry this brand anymore. Do you know any distributor in America?

< Message edited by alfredbmor -- 3/25/2008 10:23:58 PM >


_____________________________

Saito Club Member

(in reply to proptop)
       Post #: 14