Blade 400 vs Trex (Full Version)

All Forums >> [RC Helicopters] >> Electric RC Helis



Message


luv2fly2 -> Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 1:27:27 PM)

I am looking at the two. Which one is better to buy. I know the blade is better for price but what about the rest of the reasons?




redvtr1000 -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 1:48:24 PM)

I'm sure you will get varied responses on this but I would tend to believe that the general consensus will lean toward the trex. I've seen a good bit of complaints when it comes to the blade, usually dealing with weak servos and a crappy gyro.

Trex is better, maybe not cheaper but if you assemble the thing yourself you will be a lot further ahead and the heli will have better components.




helorookie -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 2:25:25 PM)

I would say that it depends on your level of training. If you are fairly new to RC Heli's, then you might want to consider the Blade. If you are rather experienced, then the T-Rex. Also, I believe it would also depend on the amount of money you are prepared or able to spend in the initial set-up. Of course, you can get a RTF Blade 400 for around $500. Then there is the T-Rex. With a full set-up, I believe the price is closer to $1,000. I could be wrong, but that is what I have heard on other threads.

I own both of them. I enjoy them both. However I do know that I will be upgrading the servos and gyro on the Blade 400 soon. [:D]




gboulton -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 2:32:30 PM)

I have flown both quite a bit, and own the Blade 400.

IMO, the answer to your question lies in "What are your skills, and why will you be flying?"

If you are an "new/beginner" pilot, no question at all, the Blade is the way to go. You simply can NOT get a T-Rex flying (and a DX6i to fly it) for the $500 price tag of the Blade. And, to be honest, even a casual "average flyer...one who is able to perform forward flight and limited aerobatics...will simply, ime, not be able to tell the difference between a Blade 400 and an "inexpensively" built T-Rex. Sure as HECK if you're just learning to hover and transition to nose in, you won't.

Now...having said all of that, there's NO QUESTION that, as your skills improve, you'll begin being able to see some differences between a WELL BUILT (and, thus, pricier) T-Rex and a 400. Find yourself an $800+ T-Rex, and you'll note that it's a bit more 'solid' in all types of flight. You, however, will need to be skilled enough to take advantage of that, or the difference will never be notable.

It's absolutely true that SOME components of the stock Blade 400 are of less quality than those typically used by T-Rex builders. You will, however, find that IN A CORRECTLY SET UP HELI, these will make little/no difference to the beginner pilot, and can, of course, be upgraded for what is, essentially, a wash in price. (Figure you'll pay the same cost for Gyro XYZ as a T-Rex owner would)

The inclusion of the DX6i radio is also a factor. Do you own other aircraft on 72mhz? if so, the Blade 400 is an excellent choice, since you can convert a majority (if not all) of your "fleet" to 2.4ghz now (presuming, of course, you wish to move away from 72mhz. If not, the radio is a wash) It's quite a capable system, and I've seen it flying anything from large gas powered aerobats to other blades to a few T-Rex's even. :)

One final thing to consider:

There's almost no doubt that, at SOME point, "hop ups" or upgraded components (CNC parts for the head assembly, more CF stuff, etc) will become available for the Blade 400. My own personal opinion is that, with such equipment, you'll be able to build the 2 helicopters so as to be indistinguishable from one another in the air. Of course, the "negative" here (from the Blade's point of view) is that A) They're not available yet (at least in any real quantities) and there's not much knowing when they will be and B) At that point, your price difference will have shrunk considerably.

================================

So, bottom line. If you'd like a heli IDEAL for growing your fleet and your skills...and one that can do anything you can NOW, and will be able to down the road...buy the Blade.

If, on the other hand, your skills are ready, and you want a high dollar precision heli that can reward a gifted pilot, and has parts/support/community available now, buy a T-Rex.

===============================




Druss -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 5:19:41 PM)

I think a good option may be going for a trex 450sa, aluminum frame so still better than plastic but not as good as carbon fiber, plastic head so no real difference there between the blade and trex... you can probably set one up w/ dx6i for around $600 so a bit more pricey than the blade 400. The big plus is that when you're ready you can upgrade anything or everything on it to a trex 450se v2. It's going to cost more in the long run this way but will have a smaller initial investment but all the electronics can be transfered.




Skarn -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/26/2008 6:16:59 PM)

You've got a lot of great advice/opinions so I won't go into great detail.

But to sum it up:

Both are nice heli's. The Blade 400 isn't in the same class as a TREX 450 SE v2 setup with nice electronics in my opinion, but as the others said, it's a lot more expensive. BUT, with that said, it boils down to a couple of things the largest being money.

So my opinion: IF you can afford to get a very nicely setup TREX 450 SE v2 with excellent electronics like HS-65mg servo's on cyclic, S9650 servo on tail, GY-401 gyro and decent radio like a DX7, that's the best bet. You won't need to be upgrading at all and things don't break as much in crashes since most parts are metal or carbon fiber. BUT if money is an issue, the Blade 400 is a very nice choice. You will eventually be upgrading the servo's and gyro and being that it's plastic, parts will break easier. But for a total price of under $500, you get a great heli and radio!

Good luck bro!
Skarn




redvtr1000 -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/28/2008 4:16:38 PM)

those of you that think you can't get a trex with a quality radio system in the same price range as the blade are wrong. It doesn't have to cost you thousands. You might spend a little more but it's probably worth it in the end, another 50-100 bucks shouldn't kill you.

http://www.helihobby.com/html/trex_helicopter.html

Heli hobby has plenty of different packages for your price ranges in question. I'm not trying to knock the blade but I can't see why you wouldn't go with the rex at that price. It has been proven to work well, parts are everywhere, and you can easily find someone flying it. The blade made some waves before it came out but I haven't seen the impressive following that you would have expected. More often than not, if I find a post about the 400 it is usually someone complaining about the crappy servos or gyro that comes with it. Might as well get good stuff right off the bat, at least that way you won't be wanting to upgrade a month down the road




Druss -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/28/2008 5:00:52 PM)

I think I've already covered this, it really depends on which trex you're talking about. There is no way you're going to set up a trex 450se v2 w/ good electronics for under $600. Even if you got the trex kit ($440) and added the servos from a DX7 ($330), add a good gyro ($100), you're still at $870. If you did it with a Trex 450SA you can take $200 off that. If you use a DX6I you can take another $150 off. So a trex 450sa w/ dx6i & logictech 2100t or gy240, you're talking $500 which is definitely worth it for better servos and gyro.

So if you're looking for something in the same price range the Trex 450SA I priced out above is a good choice at $500 vs $470 for the blade 400. If you're thinking Trex 450SE V2 then it's minimum $700.




Skarn -> RE: Blade 400 vs Trex (3/28/2008 5:53:22 PM)

Excellent points and post Druss. So many people try to generically compare a "TREX" when there is a big difference between the SE v2 and the SA.

Skarn




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.
0.15625