AZheli
Posts: 141
Joined: 1/13/2008 From: ,
AZ, USA Status: offline
|
Comparing the #4-1 to the HBFP, the Honeybee holds the advantage on several counts. Between the 2, many parts are interchangable, but when it comes to rotor hub and head design, the HB hub is supported better & is much sturdier & less prone to flexing, inducing wobble. The rotor head snaps into 2 bearings on the rotor heads. Upon heavy landing, or other minor mishaps, the head unsnaps, absorbing some of the impact & minimizing blade damage. The idea is workable on the Honeybee, as the 2 little bearings are secured into the hub by 2 tiny screws. On the DF#4-1, the head snaps off & centrifugal force causes the bearings zing off into oblivion, as there are no screws to retain them. As an added insult, none of the bearing shops stock 3x6x2mm bearings - you need to go buy a new hub, which comes with 2 new bearings. As for the NiMH batteries - the #4-1 comes with a better than average charger & the flight time isn't significantly less than that of my HBFP with a 2 cell LiPO installed. Both the Honeybee and the Dragonfly #4-1 sell for within $11 of each other the newer HB comes with a LiPO battery, while the DF still has the NiMH. Other than the inferior design of the rotor head on the DF & the LiPO standard issue on the HB, it's a matter of personal preference of brand names - a Ford vs Chebby thing ...
|