Club 40+? Someday? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [RC Airplanes] >> [Pylon Universe - RC Pylon Racing] >> Club 40



Message


Jim Duda -> Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 2:37:32 PM)

Dream or Nightmare?

What if World Models (or anyone) would offer a Q500 clone (Viper, Vortex, Predator, Seeker, Hurricane, Mad Dog, etc.) as an ARF similar to their Raider, LA Racer, for less than $100...? OK, maybe less than $115. Price target would be MSRP of the LA Racer.

Same rules as the current Club 40, same engines, 2 pole 400 ft. course, and call the event Club 40+...or something. Both classes on the same day, same course, same setbacks.

Just thinkin'...







stanlattrell -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 5:14:40 PM)

Jim, I like the idea, but how would that class be different than Quickie 500 sport (424) that we have now? Is there another sport plane design that is cleaner and faster than club 40, but not quite what the 424 is, that could use the same TT Pro 40, GMS 40, ST 40, etc. to step the performance partway to 424 levels??




skull1971 -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 5:36:43 PM)

We just need another place to get ARF Q500's from. Lets face it, Vipers are OK at best, it takes quite a bit to make one go fast and run up front. With the fine quality of the LA Racers I've seen, I'd buy one.

Ya know Airborne has a place on their website to contact them about things like this, maybe if enough people emailed them, something might happen.




stanlattrell -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 9:11:29 PM)

The World Models sells an Aircombat series 25 size box fuselage like the SRM II but done up as a Zero or Yak 9D for 79.99 street price. 48 inch wingspan, 41 inches long, 437 Square inches of wing area, and flying weight of 3 lbs. Tail dragger config. and looks a lot like the SRM II except for size and colors. Lighter and smaller is faster, right?? plus, the plane would be a nice sunday flier in a warbird configuration when not racing.
This might be a little more of a handfull for the "big boys", but still tame enough for a beginning racer to transition into. Club 40 Gold Class??




















Jim Duda -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 9:11:32 PM)

Like Eric said...it gives us another choice for a ARF Q500 type. All the other ones I mentioned are great racing platforms but they all require either building and/or painting and/or covering the wing and/or fuselage.

Mass production will be the key to a low price point and this could even be marketed as a "V-Tail Trainer". The lack of a steerable tailwheel might not appeal to the true sport pilots though.

An advantage to using the Raider/LA Racer wing (without dihedral) would be a slower speed which would lend itself to the 2 pole 400 foot course that Club 40 uses.

If they build it would we come...?





tsawyer148 -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 9:57:14 PM)

Count me in, I think that would be a great idea. Kind of a "tweener" between the club 40 and the true quickie airframes...




MetallicaJunkie -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/2/2008 10:14:53 PM)

i would definitely buy a q500 style arf in the price range above, but only if it had a traditional style tail surfaces. I love my La Racer, and am sure to take it with me whenever i fly




gunfighter -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/3/2008 3:12:55 AM)

Jim,
Are you talking about a q-500 type fuse with an LA Racer wing? I bet we could get Chuck Esh to cut us some in short order to try out the idea.
We can talk to him tomorrow.




Big Jim63265 -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/3/2008 11:19:53 AM)

What if we got Chuck Esh to cut the parts and club members got togeather to assemble and cover them, and sold them throug the club as a money maker for the club. I have been experminting with cutting foam wings and covering them with very thin hardwood veneer.
Jim McGuinn




cwesh -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/5/2008 12:32:20 AM)

Hi all!

The idea of a Club 40 + is interesting, I envision a plane that uses a Q500 style fuse, standard tail / steerable tail wheel, non-racing wheels and with the 'Raider/LA Racer wing. Top speed goal should be about 100 to 110 mph.

I plan on trying such a design myself!


(And yes, it would be a wood kit, I don't do barfs! [:D] )

Here is what I tinkered up today so far....

Later!





skull1971 -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/5/2008 1:00:24 AM)

I'm in!![)]




Fxrs_tim -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/5/2008 4:02:03 AM)

I don't really think that using the Club40 wings on a Quickee type plane would be much of a step up. With the size of the wing, you'd have to have a fuselage quite a bit longer than a Q500 in order to get the balance and pitching moments correct. Plus, the speed really won't be much higher than the Club40 planes we're flying now.

What would be really nice would be if somebody would introduce more Q500 planes. If WM would introduce a couple of them (say, one v-tail and 1 conventional), then people could move up to an inexpensive 424 type bird. I think that there would be a market for this, as it could double as a quick sport plane. I wonder if there's enough of a market for WM to offer a foam/carbon wing (ala the Viper) as an option?

For you guys that are wondering about moving up to 424, here's my take, from personal experience. The 424 plane uses the engine that you already have for Club40, so no extra $$ there. The Viper is only $20 (on sale) more than the Raider, so the airframe cost is about the same. Most everybody now owns a radio which can mix for v-tails, so that's not really an issue either. In 424 you can even use standard size servos and not have a problem balancing the plane (I did that on my first Viper and had no ballast). The most amazing thing is that a 424 bird actually flies EASIER than a Club40!! Sure, it's a bit faster, but it actually is easier to fly it smoothly than it is a Club40. Plus, with a 424, you still have a throttle if you get a bit out of shape or intimidated.

There is a HUGE gap for 424/428 ARFs. You have the Viper at $110, then it takes a huge jump to the mid $300's for a good 428 ARF. You can find a few kits (mentioned in Jim's original post) which are more affordable, but there's definitely a market for a decent 428 bird that won't break the bank. If Great Planes sells enough of the Vipers to justify continuing production, certainly somebody like WM could step in and offer a similar bird suitable for 424, and able to be strengthened a bit for 428. Heck, WM could probably steal the Viper market if they put out a comparable bird that doesn't have the well-documented incidence problem that the Viper does!

I think that having more affordable options might provide the spark that encourages others to make the jump from Club40 to 424/428 and save pylon.

Let's hope somebody's listening!!

Tim




DonStegall -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/5/2008 6:26:25 PM)

I think you're right about the need for at least a conventional tail Q-500 ARF. If I had not had personal issues with my job this winter, we would have one soon. But it will probably be the end of the year before a Quickie 25 / AMA 424 ARF comes from The World Models. If anyone has a well engineered and royalty free design ready, we will get it produced.

The ARC Sky Raider Mach II does present a FUN option for those who want to go faster. Adding sheer webs in every bay of the wing and glassing the center section would yield a plane that can hold up to unlimited .40 power. My Quickie JETT powered SRM2 is really fun to fly. With the RED JETT carb, it idles down to 3000, but when it's on the pipe, it really scoots. If flies even better at 120+ than it does at 80-90 mph. And I can still do power on landings. Mid-range is iffy, so it's pretty much full speed or landing speed.

But I think that Club 40, Quickie 25, and AMA 424 are enough for non-scale racing.

For scale racing RCPRO Warbird Racing is the ticket. It is mature and it works. It also costs more. But for those wanting more speed and scale planes, it works very well. The higher speeds, especially of the Gold bracket requires a bigger field and the retracts on many of the planes dictate smooth runways.




gunfighter -> RE: Club 40+? Someday? (5/5/2008 10:04:18 PM)

I just got back from a Q-25 race in Ft. Worth and I can tell you that they are SCREAMING for another ARF to fly! The tail of the Viper is so weak that several were / had broken at the front of the v-tail.

Many pilots would jump on a standard tail quickie.

SOMEBODY BUILD ONE AND GET IT TO WM!!

C Esh - Count me in when you build yours.

BTW - I agree with Tim. The q-500 planes do fly very well with either a 25 or a 40. BUT, SOME pilots seem to get in trouble with them more quickly / often than the club 40 planes. We had some WILD action at the race Sunday!




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.
0.34375